锁定、库存和魅力:美国白人应对新冠肺炎大流行的来源

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Victims & Offenders Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI:10.1080/15564886.2023.2183917
C. Jonson, Amanda Graham, F. Cullen, Justin T. Pickett, Murat Haner, Melissa M. Sloan
{"title":"锁定、库存和魅力:美国白人应对新冠肺炎大流行的来源","authors":"C. Jonson, Amanda Graham, F. Cullen, Justin T. Pickett, Murat Haner, Melissa M. Sloan","doi":"10.1080/15564886.2023.2183917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented number of people purchasing firearms/ammunition. However, this was not the only way Americans responded to the pandemic: large swaths of the public also stayed at home and stockpiled goods. Twelve months later, as the pandemic raged, these coping mechanisms were still present as Americans continued to buy guns/ammunition, limit social interactions, and hoard supplies. Using two nationwide surveys conducted one year apart, we examine the extent and sources of gun/ammunition purchasing compared to staying home and panic buying during this unique moment in American history. Results from both surveys indicate that the factors that led to these divergent coping mechanisms vary. Both at the beginning of the pandemic and one year later, the likelihood of purchasing a firearm/ammunition was associated low self-control and White nationalism. Conversely, fear of the virus was associated with people staying home and amassing supplies.","PeriodicalId":47085,"journal":{"name":"Victims & Offenders","volume":"18 1","pages":"765 - 798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locked, Stocked, and Charmin: Sources of White Americans’ Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"C. Jonson, Amanda Graham, F. Cullen, Justin T. Pickett, Murat Haner, Melissa M. Sloan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15564886.2023.2183917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented number of people purchasing firearms/ammunition. However, this was not the only way Americans responded to the pandemic: large swaths of the public also stayed at home and stockpiled goods. Twelve months later, as the pandemic raged, these coping mechanisms were still present as Americans continued to buy guns/ammunition, limit social interactions, and hoard supplies. Using two nationwide surveys conducted one year apart, we examine the extent and sources of gun/ammunition purchasing compared to staying home and panic buying during this unique moment in American history. Results from both surveys indicate that the factors that led to these divergent coping mechanisms vary. Both at the beginning of the pandemic and one year later, the likelihood of purchasing a firearm/ammunition was associated low self-control and White nationalism. Conversely, fear of the virus was associated with people staying home and amassing supplies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"765 - 798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2183917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victims & Offenders","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2183917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年3月,COVID-19大流行导致购买枪支/弹药的人数前所未有。然而,这并不是美国人应对大流行的唯一方式:大量公众也呆在家里储存物品。12个月后,随着疫情的肆虐,这些应对机制仍然存在,因为美国人继续购买枪支/弹药,限制社交互动,囤积物资。利用相隔一年的两项全国性调查,我们研究了在美国历史上这一独特时刻,与呆在家里和恐慌性购买相比,枪支/弹药购买的程度和来源。两项调查的结果表明,导致这些不同的应对机制的因素各不相同。无论是在疫情初期还是一年后,购买枪支/弹药的可能性都与低自制力和白人民族主义有关。相反,对病毒的恐惧与人们呆在家里囤积物资有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Locked, Stocked, and Charmin: Sources of White Americans’ Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
ABSTRACT In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented number of people purchasing firearms/ammunition. However, this was not the only way Americans responded to the pandemic: large swaths of the public also stayed at home and stockpiled goods. Twelve months later, as the pandemic raged, these coping mechanisms were still present as Americans continued to buy guns/ammunition, limit social interactions, and hoard supplies. Using two nationwide surveys conducted one year apart, we examine the extent and sources of gun/ammunition purchasing compared to staying home and panic buying during this unique moment in American history. Results from both surveys indicate that the factors that led to these divergent coping mechanisms vary. Both at the beginning of the pandemic and one year later, the likelihood of purchasing a firearm/ammunition was associated low self-control and White nationalism. Conversely, fear of the virus was associated with people staying home and amassing supplies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victims & Offenders
Victims & Offenders CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Victims & Offenders is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the dissemination of new research, policies, and practices related to both victimization and offending throughout the life course. Our aim is to provide an opportunity for researchers -- both in the United States and internationally -- from a wide range of disciplines (criminal justice, psychology, sociology, political science, economics, public health, and social work) to publish articles that examine issues from a variety of perspectives in a unique, interdisciplinary forum. We are interested in both quantitative and qualitative research, systematic, evidence-based reviews, and articles that focus on theory development related to offenders and victims.
期刊最新文献
Veterans Treatment Courts: A Nationwide Review of Enacting and Eligibility State Statutes. The Influence of Offender Motivation on Unwanted Pursuit Perpetration Among College Students Relatives’ Understanding of Perpetrators of Elder Family Financial Exploitation: A Bioecological Approach to Understanding Risk Factors What Separates Offenders Who are Not Victimized from Offenders Who are Victimized? Results from a Nationally Representative Sample of Males and Females Scams, Cons, Frauds, and Deceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1