{"title":"把学生理解为成功者和学习者","authors":"Austin S. Jennings","doi":"10.1086/723256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ data literacy and interpretive process are critical to understanding how they make sense of data. However, little is known about how mental representations shape and evolve in response to teachers’ interpretive process. In the present study, I model and explore this recursive relationship between teachers’ cognitive framing and interpretive process. Findings suggest that teachers evoke two frames, understanding students as achievers and learners, with implications for their cognitive focus on and interpretation of interim assessment data. Furthermore, findings suggest teachers’ interpretations feed back into cognitive frames via three mechanisms: elaboration, preservation, and reframing. Implications include cognitive framing as a leverage point for iterative school improvement, interim assessment report design, and new perspectives in the narrative around data use in education.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"123 1","pages":"485 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Students as Achievers and Learners\",\"authors\":\"Austin S. Jennings\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teachers’ data literacy and interpretive process are critical to understanding how they make sense of data. However, little is known about how mental representations shape and evolve in response to teachers’ interpretive process. In the present study, I model and explore this recursive relationship between teachers’ cognitive framing and interpretive process. Findings suggest that teachers evoke two frames, understanding students as achievers and learners, with implications for their cognitive focus on and interpretation of interim assessment data. Furthermore, findings suggest teachers’ interpretations feed back into cognitive frames via three mechanisms: elaboration, preservation, and reframing. Implications include cognitive framing as a leverage point for iterative school improvement, interim assessment report design, and new perspectives in the narrative around data use in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"485 - 512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Teachers’ data literacy and interpretive process are critical to understanding how they make sense of data. However, little is known about how mental representations shape and evolve in response to teachers’ interpretive process. In the present study, I model and explore this recursive relationship between teachers’ cognitive framing and interpretive process. Findings suggest that teachers evoke two frames, understanding students as achievers and learners, with implications for their cognitive focus on and interpretation of interim assessment data. Furthermore, findings suggest teachers’ interpretations feed back into cognitive frames via three mechanisms: elaboration, preservation, and reframing. Implications include cognitive framing as a leverage point for iterative school improvement, interim assessment report design, and new perspectives in the narrative around data use in education.
期刊介绍:
The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.