{"title":"探索物理教育的历史方法","authors":"E. Giannetto","doi":"10.1478/AAPP.99S1A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern physics is a complex multiplicity of practices: theoretical, mathematical, experimental and simulation practices. Experimental and simulation practices are related to the pragmatic dimension of a physical theory. Mathematical practices are related to the syntactic dimension of a physical theory, but theoretical practices involve an often neglected semantic dimension. Physics and consequently teaching physics are usually reduced to the syntactic and pragmatic dimensions. Semantic dimension is linked to the conceptualization of the physical reality, to the conception of Nature. By neglecting the semantic dimension, physics is reduced to a pure mathematical game and to technological manipulations. Thus, the cultural aspect of science is lost and physics education is reduced to a mere technical training. This process of de-culturalization of science had its roots in the Enlightenment’s turn in physics to free it from theology and metaphysics and had its completion in the post-second-world-war era. I believe we have to recover the cultural aspects of physics to understand it more deeply in its whole complexity. We have to recover all its relationships with other disciplines as philosophy, mathematics, psychology, sociology and other sciences, even theology, which are fundamental to constitute its semantic dimension. Historical approach to physics and physics education is the only way to recover this interdisciplinarity at the roots of the various physical conceptions of Nature. In this way, for example, we can understand that beyond mechanics there is a mechanist conception of Nature, beyond thermodynamics there is a thermodynamical conception of Nature, and beyond electromagnetism there is an electromagnetic conception of Nature. These different conceptions of Nature are not compatible and their historical fight has produced the relativistic, quantum and chaos revolutions in XX century physics. These different conceptions of Nature imply different existential self-understanding of the meaning of mankind in the universe and different ethical perspectives.","PeriodicalId":43431,"journal":{"name":"Atti Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a historical approach to physics education\",\"authors\":\"E. Giannetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1478/AAPP.99S1A1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern physics is a complex multiplicity of practices: theoretical, mathematical, experimental and simulation practices. Experimental and simulation practices are related to the pragmatic dimension of a physical theory. Mathematical practices are related to the syntactic dimension of a physical theory, but theoretical practices involve an often neglected semantic dimension. Physics and consequently teaching physics are usually reduced to the syntactic and pragmatic dimensions. Semantic dimension is linked to the conceptualization of the physical reality, to the conception of Nature. By neglecting the semantic dimension, physics is reduced to a pure mathematical game and to technological manipulations. Thus, the cultural aspect of science is lost and physics education is reduced to a mere technical training. This process of de-culturalization of science had its roots in the Enlightenment’s turn in physics to free it from theology and metaphysics and had its completion in the post-second-world-war era. I believe we have to recover the cultural aspects of physics to understand it more deeply in its whole complexity. We have to recover all its relationships with other disciplines as philosophy, mathematics, psychology, sociology and other sciences, even theology, which are fundamental to constitute its semantic dimension. Historical approach to physics and physics education is the only way to recover this interdisciplinarity at the roots of the various physical conceptions of Nature. In this way, for example, we can understand that beyond mechanics there is a mechanist conception of Nature, beyond thermodynamics there is a thermodynamical conception of Nature, and beyond electromagnetism there is an electromagnetic conception of Nature. These different conceptions of Nature are not compatible and their historical fight has produced the relativistic, quantum and chaos revolutions in XX century physics. These different conceptions of Nature imply different existential self-understanding of the meaning of mankind in the universe and different ethical perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atti Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atti Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1478/AAPP.99S1A1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atti Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1478/AAPP.99S1A1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards a historical approach to physics education
Modern physics is a complex multiplicity of practices: theoretical, mathematical, experimental and simulation practices. Experimental and simulation practices are related to the pragmatic dimension of a physical theory. Mathematical practices are related to the syntactic dimension of a physical theory, but theoretical practices involve an often neglected semantic dimension. Physics and consequently teaching physics are usually reduced to the syntactic and pragmatic dimensions. Semantic dimension is linked to the conceptualization of the physical reality, to the conception of Nature. By neglecting the semantic dimension, physics is reduced to a pure mathematical game and to technological manipulations. Thus, the cultural aspect of science is lost and physics education is reduced to a mere technical training. This process of de-culturalization of science had its roots in the Enlightenment’s turn in physics to free it from theology and metaphysics and had its completion in the post-second-world-war era. I believe we have to recover the cultural aspects of physics to understand it more deeply in its whole complexity. We have to recover all its relationships with other disciplines as philosophy, mathematics, psychology, sociology and other sciences, even theology, which are fundamental to constitute its semantic dimension. Historical approach to physics and physics education is the only way to recover this interdisciplinarity at the roots of the various physical conceptions of Nature. In this way, for example, we can understand that beyond mechanics there is a mechanist conception of Nature, beyond thermodynamics there is a thermodynamical conception of Nature, and beyond electromagnetism there is an electromagnetic conception of Nature. These different conceptions of Nature are not compatible and their historical fight has produced the relativistic, quantum and chaos revolutions in XX century physics. These different conceptions of Nature imply different existential self-understanding of the meaning of mankind in the universe and different ethical perspectives.
期刊介绍:
This journal is of a multi- and inter-disciplinary nature and covers a broad range of fields including mathematics, computer science, physics, chemistry, biology, earth sciences, and their intersection. History of science is also included within the topics addressed by the journal. The transactions of the Pelorian Academy started out as periodic news sheets containing the notes presented by the members of the Divisions into which the Academy has been and still is organized, according to subject areas. The publication of these notes for the Division (“Classe”) of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences is the responsibility of the Editorial Committee, which is composed of the Director of the division with the role of Chairman, the Vice-Director, the Secretary and two or more other members. Besides original research articles, the journal also accepts texts from conferences and invited talks held in the Academy. These contributions are published in a different section of the journal. In addition to the regular issues, single monographic supplements are occasionally published which assemble reports and communications presented at congresses, symposia, seminars, study meetings and other scientific events organized by the Academy or under its patronage. Since 2004 these transactions have been published online in the form of an open access electronic journal.