Q3 Social Sciences Revija za Sociologiju Pub Date : 2019-08-31 DOI:10.5613/rzs.49.2.7
Marina Milković, Marina Štambuk
{"title":"Kako pristupiti mjerenju seksualne orijentacije, spolnog i rodnog identiteta? Preporuke za istraživanja o temama koje se odnose na LGBTIQ osobe","authors":"Marina Milković, Marina Štambuk","doi":"10.5613/rzs.49.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been an increasing interest in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) issues in social science research in Croatia. Additionally, LGBTIQ people can be sampled in almost any research. However, it is usually assumed that all study participants are heterosexual and cisgender. In consequence, a limited number of categories for LGBTIQ individuals are typically included in questionnaires. Such an approach results in biased sample characteristics, which can both affect the interpretation of results and provoke LGBTIQ participants to refrain from providing answers to certain questions or refuse further participation. In addition, it represents a violation of the scientific research ethical principle of avoiding discrimination or privilege based on sex, gender identity, and expression or sexual orientation. In this paper, recommendations are offered for research that acknowledges LGBTIQ people by including different response options for sexual orientation, sex, and gender identity. These recommendations are based on an overview of different theoretical explanations and approaches in the measurement of gender, sex and sexual orientation in Croatian and international research, as well as on the authors’ experience in professional work with LGBTIQ people. As a possible step towards recognising LGBTIQ identities, introducing questions about sexual orientation and gender identity into research is recommended where those variables could be relevant for the studied subject. Also, since sex is a frequent research variable and commonly used response options “male” and “female” do not apply to a part of the population, adding a response option for self-identification or “something else” is recommended. In addition to item construction examples, explanations of the key concepts important for research including LGBTIQ people are provided.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5613/rzs.49.2.7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija za Sociologiju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.49.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在克罗地亚的社会科学研究中,人们对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、双性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ)问题越来越感兴趣。此外,几乎在任何研究中都可以对LGBTIQ人群进行抽样。然而,通常认为所有研究参与者都是异性恋和顺性别者。因此,调查问卷中通常包括数量有限的LGBTIQ个体类别。这种方法会产生有偏见的样本特征,这既会影响对结果的解释,也会促使LGBTIQ参与者避免回答某些问题或拒绝进一步参与。此外,它违反了科学研究伦理原则,即避免基于性别、性别认同、表达或性取向的歧视或特权。在这篇论文中,通过包括性取向、性和性别认同的不同反应选项,为承认LGBTIQ人群的研究提供了建议。这些建议基于对克罗地亚和国际研究中衡量性别、性和性取向的不同理论解释和方法的概述,以及作者与LGBTIQ人群的专业工作经验。作为识别LGBTIQ身份的可能步骤,建议在研究中引入有关性取向和性别认同的问题,因为这些变量可能与研究对象相关。此外,由于性别是一个常见的研究变量,通常使用的回答选项“男性”和“女性”不适用于部分人群,因此建议添加一个自我认同或“其他东西”的回答选项。除了项目结构示例外,还提供了对研究重要的关键概念的解释,包括LGBTIQ人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kako pristupiti mjerenju seksualne orijentacije, spolnog i rodnog identiteta? Preporuke za istraživanja o temama koje se odnose na LGBTIQ osobe
There has been an increasing interest in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) issues in social science research in Croatia. Additionally, LGBTIQ people can be sampled in almost any research. However, it is usually assumed that all study participants are heterosexual and cisgender. In consequence, a limited number of categories for LGBTIQ individuals are typically included in questionnaires. Such an approach results in biased sample characteristics, which can both affect the interpretation of results and provoke LGBTIQ participants to refrain from providing answers to certain questions or refuse further participation. In addition, it represents a violation of the scientific research ethical principle of avoiding discrimination or privilege based on sex, gender identity, and expression or sexual orientation. In this paper, recommendations are offered for research that acknowledges LGBTIQ people by including different response options for sexual orientation, sex, and gender identity. These recommendations are based on an overview of different theoretical explanations and approaches in the measurement of gender, sex and sexual orientation in Croatian and international research, as well as on the authors’ experience in professional work with LGBTIQ people. As a possible step towards recognising LGBTIQ identities, introducing questions about sexual orientation and gender identity into research is recommended where those variables could be relevant for the studied subject. Also, since sex is a frequent research variable and commonly used response options “male” and “female” do not apply to a part of the population, adding a response option for self-identification or “something else” is recommended. In addition to item construction examples, explanations of the key concepts important for research including LGBTIQ people are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revija za Sociologiju
Revija za Sociologiju Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ludwik Fleck Percepcija i iskustvo rodne diskriminacije studenata i studentica na Sveučilištu u Zagrebu Traženje povezanosti medijske pismenosti i političke participacije kod različitih generacija Gledaj (TV) i uči? Važnost (utjelovljenog) kulturnog kapitala u objašnjenju klasične i digitalne medijske pismenosti Biti medijski pismen u Hrvatskoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1