V. S.奈保尔和乔治·兰明在BBC:重新考虑风刮一代的政治艺术

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE Pub Date : 2020-12-29 DOI:10.1353/ari.2021.0005
A. Fabrizio
{"title":"V. S.奈保尔和乔治·兰明在BBC:重新考虑风刮一代的政治艺术","authors":"A. Fabrizio","doi":"10.1353/ari.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reconsiders V. S. Naipaul's cultural politics by attending to his work with the BBC in the middle decades of the twentieth century, particularly alongside the midcentury political argument of George Lamming. Because of Naipaul's skepticism of Caribbean autonomy in his later life, critics have overlooked his anticolonial and antiracist critique in the midcentury. This elision has led to a simplification of the Windrush generation's cultural politics. Scholars of these writers often paint Naipaul and Lamming as political opposites; this essay instead draws parallels between their emphases on the development of a Caribbean literary tradition. Through extensive archival work, including the examination of a heretofore unexplored Third Programme discussion, this article sheds new light on the multifarious ways that Windrush writers worked out their mutual desire for aesthetic and cultural autonomy for Caribbean writers.","PeriodicalId":51893,"journal":{"name":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","volume":"52 1","pages":"153 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ari.2021.0005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"V. S. Naipaul and George Lamming at the BBC: Reconsidering the Windrush Generation's Political Art\",\"authors\":\"A. Fabrizio\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ari.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article reconsiders V. S. Naipaul's cultural politics by attending to his work with the BBC in the middle decades of the twentieth century, particularly alongside the midcentury political argument of George Lamming. Because of Naipaul's skepticism of Caribbean autonomy in his later life, critics have overlooked his anticolonial and antiracist critique in the midcentury. This elision has led to a simplification of the Windrush generation's cultural politics. Scholars of these writers often paint Naipaul and Lamming as political opposites; this essay instead draws parallels between their emphases on the development of a Caribbean literary tradition. Through extensive archival work, including the examination of a heretofore unexplored Third Programme discussion, this article sheds new light on the multifarious ways that Windrush writers worked out their mutual desire for aesthetic and cultural autonomy for Caribbean writers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"153 - 179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ari.2021.0005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2021.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文通过考察奈保罗在二十世纪中叶与英国广播公司的合作,特别是与乔治·拉明的世纪中期政治争论一起,重新审视了奈保罗的文化政治。由于奈保尔晚年对加勒比自治持怀疑态度,批评者忽视了他在本世纪中叶的反殖民和反种族主义批判。这种省略导致了Windrush一代文化政治的简化。这些作家的学者经常把奈保尔和拉明描绘成政治上的对立;相反,这篇文章将他们对加勒比海文学传统发展的重视进行了比较。通过广泛的档案工作,包括对迄今为止尚未探索的第三计划讨论的审查,本文揭示了Windrush作家为加勒比作家实现审美和文化自主权的共同愿望的多种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
V. S. Naipaul and George Lamming at the BBC: Reconsidering the Windrush Generation's Political Art
Abstract:This article reconsiders V. S. Naipaul's cultural politics by attending to his work with the BBC in the middle decades of the twentieth century, particularly alongside the midcentury political argument of George Lamming. Because of Naipaul's skepticism of Caribbean autonomy in his later life, critics have overlooked his anticolonial and antiracist critique in the midcentury. This elision has led to a simplification of the Windrush generation's cultural politics. Scholars of these writers often paint Naipaul and Lamming as political opposites; this essay instead draws parallels between their emphases on the development of a Caribbean literary tradition. Through extensive archival work, including the examination of a heretofore unexplored Third Programme discussion, this article sheds new light on the multifarious ways that Windrush writers worked out their mutual desire for aesthetic and cultural autonomy for Caribbean writers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Intra-oral Drainage of Submandibular Abscess: A Minimally Invasive Technique. A Prospective Study. Beyond Impasse: Affect and Language Community in Select Contemporary Afrikaans Lyric Poetry The Undiscovered Country by Andre Bagoo (review) How Things Will Go: Genre, Infrastructure, and Hope in Welcome to Lagos Unsettling Nature: Ecology, Phenomenology, and the Settler Colonial Imagination by Taylor Eggan (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1