克里斯汀·拉夫兰斯达特笔下特里斯坦与伊索尔德的浪漫故事

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE EXPLICATOR Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522
S. Barnes
{"title":"克里斯汀·拉夫兰斯达特笔下特里斯坦与伊索尔德的浪漫故事","authors":"S. Barnes","doi":"10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the ongoing centennial of Kristin Lavransdatter’s publication (The Wreath in 1920; The Wife, 1921; The Cross, 1922), a new generation of readers is discovering Sigrid Undset’s trilogy. Notoriously difficult to interpret, its complexities can tax even a seasoned reader to the breaking point. If, however, good imaginative writing “is ideally as ambiguous and opaque as life itself,” intentionally absent of any “swiftly expressible message,” as John Updike once described it (29), then Kristin Lavransdatter is an exemplary work. For instance, how should readers think about the story’s protagonist? Kristin is self-sacrificing and vengeful, pious and self-pitying, unforgiving and generous. Her childhood at Jørundgaard and her dotage at Rein Convent could be viewed as mere bookends, unsatisfying authorial “gestures,” bracketing what is otherwise a lifetime of struggle, marked more by moral failure than by triumph. Similarly, how should readers understand Erlend Nikulaussøn, Kristin’s husband? At one moment, he is dashing and courageous; in the next, he is reckless, imprudent, and selfish beyond belief, imperiling everyone he loves for the briefest of pleasures. Quick to overlook others’ wrongdoings, he is equally hasty in forgetting his own, exposing a moral shallowness that clouds his vision, hiding from himself the consequences of his folly. Kristin and Erlend are, of course, only the two most obvious challenges readers must face in Undset’s trilogy. Even so, grappling with such difficulties can be revelatory, and not only of the text, for in struggling with the story, readers can be led to unexplored reaches in their own souls. The stakes, then, of taking up such a work are high, for the consequences of misreading can be two-fold: a misinterpretation of the story cannot easily be separated from a misunderstanding of the self. This interpretive interplay between reader and text is relevant to this essay’s purpose, but only as a secondary concern. Its primary objective is to remain within the narrative, examining the ways that two of its characters engage with other imaginative works. In other words, https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522","PeriodicalId":42643,"journal":{"name":"EXPLICATOR","volume":"79 1","pages":"178 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The romance of Tristan and Isolde in Kristin Lavransdatter\",\"authors\":\"S. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the ongoing centennial of Kristin Lavransdatter’s publication (The Wreath in 1920; The Wife, 1921; The Cross, 1922), a new generation of readers is discovering Sigrid Undset’s trilogy. Notoriously difficult to interpret, its complexities can tax even a seasoned reader to the breaking point. If, however, good imaginative writing “is ideally as ambiguous and opaque as life itself,” intentionally absent of any “swiftly expressible message,” as John Updike once described it (29), then Kristin Lavransdatter is an exemplary work. For instance, how should readers think about the story’s protagonist? Kristin is self-sacrificing and vengeful, pious and self-pitying, unforgiving and generous. Her childhood at Jørundgaard and her dotage at Rein Convent could be viewed as mere bookends, unsatisfying authorial “gestures,” bracketing what is otherwise a lifetime of struggle, marked more by moral failure than by triumph. Similarly, how should readers understand Erlend Nikulaussøn, Kristin’s husband? At one moment, he is dashing and courageous; in the next, he is reckless, imprudent, and selfish beyond belief, imperiling everyone he loves for the briefest of pleasures. Quick to overlook others’ wrongdoings, he is equally hasty in forgetting his own, exposing a moral shallowness that clouds his vision, hiding from himself the consequences of his folly. Kristin and Erlend are, of course, only the two most obvious challenges readers must face in Undset’s trilogy. Even so, grappling with such difficulties can be revelatory, and not only of the text, for in struggling with the story, readers can be led to unexplored reaches in their own souls. The stakes, then, of taking up such a work are high, for the consequences of misreading can be two-fold: a misinterpretation of the story cannot easily be separated from a misunderstanding of the self. This interpretive interplay between reader and text is relevant to this essay’s purpose, but only as a secondary concern. Its primary objective is to remain within the narrative, examining the ways that two of its characters engage with other imaginative works. In other words, https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522\",\"PeriodicalId\":42643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXPLICATOR\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"178 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXPLICATOR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXPLICATOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Kristin Lavransdatter出版百年期间(1920年的《摔跤手》;1921年的《妻子》;1922年的《十字架》),新一代读者正在发现Sigrid Undset的三部曲。众所周知,它很难解读,其复杂性甚至会让经验丰富的读者感到崩溃。然而,如果像约翰·厄普代克(John Updike)曾描述的那样,好的富有想象力的写作“理想情况下与生活本身一样模糊和不透明”,故意没有任何“快速表达的信息”(29),那么克里斯汀·拉夫兰斯达特就是一部典范之作。例如,读者应该如何看待故事的主人公?克莉丝汀是自我牺牲和复仇,虔诚和自怜,不可原谅和慷慨。她在Jørundgaard的童年和在Rein Convent的晚年可以被视为仅仅是书尾,令人不满意的作者“姿态”,包括了她一生的斗争,更多的是道德上的失败,而不是胜利。同样,读者应该如何理解Kristin的丈夫Erlend Nikulaussøn?在某个时刻,他是潇洒和勇敢的;其次,他鲁莽、鲁莽、自私得令人难以置信,为了最短暂的快乐而危及他所爱的每一个人。他很快就忽略了别人的错误,也同样草率地忘记了自己的错误,暴露了道德上的浅薄,掩盖了自己愚蠢的后果。当然,Kristin和Erlend只是读者在Undset三部曲中必须面对的两个最明显的挑战。即便如此,与这些困难作斗争也可能具有启示性,而不仅仅是对文本,因为在与故事作斗争的过程中,读者可能会被引导到自己灵魂中未经探索的领域。因此,从事这样一项工作的风险很高,因为误读的后果可能有两方面:对故事的误解很容易与对自我的误解分开。读者和文本之间的这种解释性互动与本文的目的有关,但只是次要的关注点。它的主要目标是保持在叙事中,研究其中两个角色与其他富有想象力的作品的互动方式。换句话说,https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The romance of Tristan and Isolde in Kristin Lavransdatter
During the ongoing centennial of Kristin Lavransdatter’s publication (The Wreath in 1920; The Wife, 1921; The Cross, 1922), a new generation of readers is discovering Sigrid Undset’s trilogy. Notoriously difficult to interpret, its complexities can tax even a seasoned reader to the breaking point. If, however, good imaginative writing “is ideally as ambiguous and opaque as life itself,” intentionally absent of any “swiftly expressible message,” as John Updike once described it (29), then Kristin Lavransdatter is an exemplary work. For instance, how should readers think about the story’s protagonist? Kristin is self-sacrificing and vengeful, pious and self-pitying, unforgiving and generous. Her childhood at Jørundgaard and her dotage at Rein Convent could be viewed as mere bookends, unsatisfying authorial “gestures,” bracketing what is otherwise a lifetime of struggle, marked more by moral failure than by triumph. Similarly, how should readers understand Erlend Nikulaussøn, Kristin’s husband? At one moment, he is dashing and courageous; in the next, he is reckless, imprudent, and selfish beyond belief, imperiling everyone he loves for the briefest of pleasures. Quick to overlook others’ wrongdoings, he is equally hasty in forgetting his own, exposing a moral shallowness that clouds his vision, hiding from himself the consequences of his folly. Kristin and Erlend are, of course, only the two most obvious challenges readers must face in Undset’s trilogy. Even so, grappling with such difficulties can be revelatory, and not only of the text, for in struggling with the story, readers can be led to unexplored reaches in their own souls. The stakes, then, of taking up such a work are high, for the consequences of misreading can be two-fold: a misinterpretation of the story cannot easily be separated from a misunderstanding of the self. This interpretive interplay between reader and text is relevant to this essay’s purpose, but only as a secondary concern. Its primary objective is to remain within the narrative, examining the ways that two of its characters engage with other imaginative works. In other words, https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005522
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXPLICATOR
EXPLICATOR LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Concentrating on works that are frequently anthologized and studied in college classrooms, The Explicator, with its yearly index of titles, is a must for college and university libraries and teachers of literature. Text-based criticism thrives in The Explicator. One of few in its class, the journal publishes concise notes on passages of prose and poetry. Each issue contains between 25 and 30 notes on works of literature, ranging from ancient Greek and Roman times to our own, from throughout the world. Students rely on The Explicator for insight into works they are studying.
期刊最新文献
Thoreau’s philosophy of work in frost’s “mowing” “The Work Wisdom of ‘From Plane to Plane’” The Underthought of John Milton’s Samson Agonistes in Gerard Manley Hopkins’s “My own heart let me more have pity on.” “Hallow’d Mold”: Collins’s “Ode, Written in the Beginning of the Year 1746” (“How Sleep the Brave”) Consent, rape and pollution: the context of Hrosvitha’s Dulcitius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1