“互联网不高兴”:twitter和2017年Equifax数据泄露事件

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595
A. Novak, Olguta Vilceanu
{"title":"“互联网不高兴”:twitter和2017年Equifax数据泄露事件","authors":"A. Novak, Olguta Vilceanu","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 2017 Equifax data breach left 144.5 million users digitally vulnerable to identity theft and future hacks. The organization’s failure to provide ongoing communication and information regarding the attack, motivated users to form crisis communities within the Twitter platform. This study examines the discourses present within the platform as users discussed the data breach. Digital crisis communities provide researchers opportunities to study how public users respond and react to a digital threat, particularly one that impacts online security and privacy. Through a qualitative analysis of tweets from the 3 weeks after the breach was announced, three discourses emerged that represented user frustrations and reactions to the security violation. These include breaking news, anger and outrage, and blame attribution. The findings of this study are relevant for those studying crisis communication, the Twitter platform, and online communities.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"22 1","pages":"196 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The internet is not pleased”: twitter and the 2017 Equifax data breach\",\"authors\":\"A. Novak, Olguta Vilceanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The 2017 Equifax data breach left 144.5 million users digitally vulnerable to identity theft and future hacks. The organization’s failure to provide ongoing communication and information regarding the attack, motivated users to form crisis communities within the Twitter platform. This study examines the discourses present within the platform as users discussed the data breach. Digital crisis communities provide researchers opportunities to study how public users respond and react to a digital threat, particularly one that impacts online security and privacy. Through a qualitative analysis of tweets from the 3 weeks after the breach was announced, three discourses emerged that represented user frustrations and reactions to the security violation. These include breaking news, anger and outrage, and blame attribution. The findings of this study are relevant for those studying crisis communication, the Twitter platform, and online communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2017年Equifax数据泄露使1.445亿用户在数字上容易受到身份盗窃和未来黑客的攻击。该组织未能提供有关攻击的持续沟通和信息,促使用户在Twitter平台上形成危机社区。本研究考察了用户讨论数据泄露时平台内的话语。数字危机社区为研究人员提供了研究公众用户如何应对数字威胁的机会,特别是那些影响在线安全和隐私的威胁。通过对泄露事件宣布后3周内的推文进行定性分析,我们发现有三种言论代表了用户对安全违规行为的不满和反应。这些包括突发新闻,愤怒和愤怒,以及归咎。这项研究的结果与那些研究危机沟通、Twitter平台和在线社区的人有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“The internet is not pleased”: twitter and the 2017 Equifax data breach
ABSTRACT The 2017 Equifax data breach left 144.5 million users digitally vulnerable to identity theft and future hacks. The organization’s failure to provide ongoing communication and information regarding the attack, motivated users to form crisis communities within the Twitter platform. This study examines the discourses present within the platform as users discussed the data breach. Digital crisis communities provide researchers opportunities to study how public users respond and react to a digital threat, particularly one that impacts online security and privacy. Through a qualitative analysis of tweets from the 3 weeks after the breach was announced, three discourses emerged that represented user frustrations and reactions to the security violation. These include breaking news, anger and outrage, and blame attribution. The findings of this study are relevant for those studying crisis communication, the Twitter platform, and online communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1