{"title":"1967年以色列独立日:战争前夕的混杂信息","authors":"L. Eisenberg","doi":"10.1080/13531042.2021.2045081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Israel’s 19th Independence Day preceded the Six-Day War by three weeks. Amid worsening regional tensions, the Eshkol government supplemented traditional diplomacy and deterrence by modifying Independence Day rituals with the intention of deterring further Arab provocations; reassuring Israelis of their leaders’ competency; leading the West to blame the Arabs, should war erupt; and asserting freedom of action in Jerusalem. A close analysis of this tinkering with the press, a poem, and a parade illuminates Eshkol’s management of the deteriorating security situation and Israel’s assumptions about Arab and global actors during the “waiting period eve” (erev ha-hamtana) preceding the three-week countdown to the war. The modified rituals failed to deter the Arabs, fully reassure Israelis or appease the West, instead exacerbating tensions, but successfully demonstrated Israel’s sovereignty in Jerusalem.","PeriodicalId":43363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Israeli History","volume":"39 1","pages":"177 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Israeli Independence Day, 1967: Mixed Messages on the Eve of War\",\"authors\":\"L. Eisenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13531042.2021.2045081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Israel’s 19th Independence Day preceded the Six-Day War by three weeks. Amid worsening regional tensions, the Eshkol government supplemented traditional diplomacy and deterrence by modifying Independence Day rituals with the intention of deterring further Arab provocations; reassuring Israelis of their leaders’ competency; leading the West to blame the Arabs, should war erupt; and asserting freedom of action in Jerusalem. A close analysis of this tinkering with the press, a poem, and a parade illuminates Eshkol’s management of the deteriorating security situation and Israel’s assumptions about Arab and global actors during the “waiting period eve” (erev ha-hamtana) preceding the three-week countdown to the war. The modified rituals failed to deter the Arabs, fully reassure Israelis or appease the West, instead exacerbating tensions, but successfully demonstrated Israel’s sovereignty in Jerusalem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"177 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2021.2045081\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Israeli History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2021.2045081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要以色列第19个独立日比六日战争提前了三周。在地区紧张局势不断恶化的情况下,埃什科尔政府通过修改独立日仪式来补充传统外交和威慑,以遏制阿拉伯的进一步挑衅;向以色列人保证其领导人的能力;如果战争爆发,导致西方指责阿拉伯人;以及在耶路撒冷维护行动自由。通过对媒体、一首诗和一场游行的仔细分析,可以看出埃什科尔对不断恶化的安全局势的管理,以及以色列在战争倒计时三周前的“等待期前夕”(erev ha hamtana)对阿拉伯和全球行为体的假设。修改后的仪式未能阻止阿拉伯人,也未能完全安抚以色列人或安抚西方,反而加剧了紧张局势,但成功地展示了以色列在耶路撒冷的主权。
Israeli Independence Day, 1967: Mixed Messages on the Eve of War
ABSTRACT Israel’s 19th Independence Day preceded the Six-Day War by three weeks. Amid worsening regional tensions, the Eshkol government supplemented traditional diplomacy and deterrence by modifying Independence Day rituals with the intention of deterring further Arab provocations; reassuring Israelis of their leaders’ competency; leading the West to blame the Arabs, should war erupt; and asserting freedom of action in Jerusalem. A close analysis of this tinkering with the press, a poem, and a parade illuminates Eshkol’s management of the deteriorating security situation and Israel’s assumptions about Arab and global actors during the “waiting period eve” (erev ha-hamtana) preceding the three-week countdown to the war. The modified rituals failed to deter the Arabs, fully reassure Israelis or appease the West, instead exacerbating tensions, but successfully demonstrated Israel’s sovereignty in Jerusalem.