{"title":"手势,工作和分类理论。皮尔斯和布洛赫之间的对话","authors":"G. Borrelli","doi":"10.13130/2240-9599/11111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will try to establish a parallel between Charles S. Peirce’s (1839-1914) and Ernst Bloch’s (1885-1977) theory of categories. Both the authors hypothesise a phenomenological foundation for their theory of categories: categories are elements of Experience (according to Peirce) and products of Praxis (according to Bloch). Nevertheless, Bloch’s phenomenology is characterised by a peculiar aspect: according to Bloch, the gestural dimension plays a fundamental role in the Knowledge Process, positing the category of ‘Possibility’. In line with Maddalena’s analyses on the relation between ‘Complete Gesture’ and ‘Work’, I will try to illustrate that the parallel between Bloch and Peirce can be extended, by including the semiotic dimension of gesture.","PeriodicalId":53793,"journal":{"name":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gesto, lavoro e teoria delle categorie. Per un dialogo tra Peirce e Bloch\",\"authors\":\"G. Borrelli\",\"doi\":\"10.13130/2240-9599/11111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will try to establish a parallel between Charles S. Peirce’s (1839-1914) and Ernst Bloch’s (1885-1977) theory of categories. Both the authors hypothesise a phenomenological foundation for their theory of categories: categories are elements of Experience (according to Peirce) and products of Praxis (according to Bloch). Nevertheless, Bloch’s phenomenology is characterised by a peculiar aspect: according to Bloch, the gestural dimension plays a fundamental role in the Knowledge Process, positing the category of ‘Possibility’. In line with Maddalena’s analyses on the relation between ‘Complete Gesture’ and ‘Work’, I will try to illustrate that the parallel between Bloch and Peirce can be extended, by including the semiotic dimension of gesture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/11111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/11111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中,我将尝试在Charles S. Peirce(1839-1914)和Ernst Bloch(1885-1977)的范畴理论之间建立一种平行关系。两位作者都为他们的范畴理论假设了现象学基础:范畴是经验的要素(根据皮尔斯的说法)和实践的产物(根据布洛赫的说法)。然而,布洛赫的现象学有一个特殊的方面:根据布洛赫的观点,手势维度在知识过程中起着基本的作用,设定了“可能性”的范畴。根据madalena对“完整手势”和“工作”之间关系的分析,我将试图说明布洛赫和皮尔斯之间的平行可以通过包括手势的符号学维度来扩展。
Gesto, lavoro e teoria delle categorie. Per un dialogo tra Peirce e Bloch
In this paper, I will try to establish a parallel between Charles S. Peirce’s (1839-1914) and Ernst Bloch’s (1885-1977) theory of categories. Both the authors hypothesise a phenomenological foundation for their theory of categories: categories are elements of Experience (according to Peirce) and products of Praxis (according to Bloch). Nevertheless, Bloch’s phenomenology is characterised by a peculiar aspect: according to Bloch, the gestural dimension plays a fundamental role in the Knowledge Process, positing the category of ‘Possibility’. In line with Maddalena’s analyses on the relation between ‘Complete Gesture’ and ‘Work’, I will try to illustrate that the parallel between Bloch and Peirce can be extended, by including the semiotic dimension of gesture.