元认知疗法与行为激活对老年2型糖尿病患者执行功能的影响比较

K. Bayegan, N. Sotodehasl, A. Karami, Hasan Asadzadeh Dahraei
{"title":"元认知疗法与行为激活对老年2型糖尿病患者执行功能的影响比较","authors":"K. Bayegan, N. Sotodehasl, A. Karami, Hasan Asadzadeh Dahraei","doi":"10.30483/RIJM.2021.254187.1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in the body whose prevalence is constantly increasing. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and behavioral activation on executive functions of elderly people with type 2 diabetes.Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with pretest, posttest, and control group design, and a three-month follow-up. The statistical population included people with type 2 diabetes who were referred to five endocrine clinics located in area 11 and were at least 60 years old and 75 years old at most. Forty-five women and men participated in this study through a purposeful and voluntary sampling method. Wisconsin card was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics by analysis of covariance and repeated measure ANOVA with SPSS.25 software. Results: The results showed that show that there is no statistically significant difference between metacognitive and behavioral activation groups in the subscales of executive function, and the mean post-test of the groups is almost equal (p 0.05).Conclusion: It can be concluded that meta-cognitive therapy and behavioral activation increased effective executive functions.","PeriodicalId":20994,"journal":{"name":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy and Behavioral Activation on Executive Functions of Elderly People with Type 2 Diabetes\",\"authors\":\"K. Bayegan, N. Sotodehasl, A. Karami, Hasan Asadzadeh Dahraei\",\"doi\":\"10.30483/RIJM.2021.254187.1039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in the body whose prevalence is constantly increasing. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and behavioral activation on executive functions of elderly people with type 2 diabetes.Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with pretest, posttest, and control group design, and a three-month follow-up. The statistical population included people with type 2 diabetes who were referred to five endocrine clinics located in area 11 and were at least 60 years old and 75 years old at most. Forty-five women and men participated in this study through a purposeful and voluntary sampling method. Wisconsin card was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics by analysis of covariance and repeated measure ANOVA with SPSS.25 software. Results: The results showed that show that there is no statistically significant difference between metacognitive and behavioral activation groups in the subscales of executive function, and the mean post-test of the groups is almost equal (p 0.05).Conclusion: It can be concluded that meta-cognitive therapy and behavioral activation increased effective executive functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Razavi International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"18-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Razavi International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30483/RIJM.2021.254187.1039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30483/RIJM.2021.254187.1039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病是一种发病率不断上升的体内代谢性疾病。目的:本研究的目的是比较元认知疗法和行为激活对老年2型糖尿病患者执行功能的影响。方法:本研究为准实验研究,采用前测、后测和对照组设计,随访3个月。统计人群包括在11区5家内分泌诊所就诊的2型糖尿病患者,年龄不小于60岁,不大于75岁。45名女性和男性通过有目的和自愿的抽样方法参与了这项研究。威斯康星卡用于数据收集。数据分析采用均数、标准差等描述性统计,采用SPSS.25软件进行协方差分析和重复测量方差分析进行推理统计。结果:元认知组和行为激活组在执行功能亚量表上差异无统计学意义,两组后验均值基本相等(p < 0.05)。结论:元认知治疗和行为激活可提高有效执行功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy and Behavioral Activation on Executive Functions of Elderly People with Type 2 Diabetes
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in the body whose prevalence is constantly increasing. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and behavioral activation on executive functions of elderly people with type 2 diabetes.Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with pretest, posttest, and control group design, and a three-month follow-up. The statistical population included people with type 2 diabetes who were referred to five endocrine clinics located in area 11 and were at least 60 years old and 75 years old at most. Forty-five women and men participated in this study through a purposeful and voluntary sampling method. Wisconsin card was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics by analysis of covariance and repeated measure ANOVA with SPSS.25 software. Results: The results showed that show that there is no statistically significant difference between metacognitive and behavioral activation groups in the subscales of executive function, and the mean post-test of the groups is almost equal (p 0.05).Conclusion: It can be concluded that meta-cognitive therapy and behavioral activation increased effective executive functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Razavi International Journal of Medicine aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and medical sciences. The Razavi International Journal of Medicine is an international, English language, peer-reviewed, open access, free access journal dealing with general Medicine and medical sciences, clinical and basic studies, public health, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the education and research department, Razavi Hospital and is published quarterly.
期刊最新文献
The evaluation of metabolic syndrome in patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a cross-sectional study of Iranian population Investigation of the Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy in the Relationship of Social Adjustment with Academic Engagement and Achievement Goals Among High School Students Comparison of the Effect of Lazarus Multimodal Approach and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Psychological Distress, Working Memory, and Anxiety in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Based on Psychological Capitals on the Experience Avoidance and Suicidal ideations in Female Victims of Domestic Violence The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Nulliparous Pregnant Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1