{"title":"城市绿化:构建边缘化社区实施绿色基础设施的规划挑战","authors":"D. Rivera, Marccus D. Hendricks","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2022.2147340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green infrastructure (GI) remains a critical tool for addressing and managing environmental risks and hazards, yet its implementation and maintenance remains highly uncertain and inequitable. From the perspectives of climate and environmental justice, GI has repeatedly been shown to entrench inequity through uneven (quality and distribution) implementation (Hendricks et al., 2018; Hendricks & Van Zandt, 2021). Following literature on “municipal underbounding” (Durst, 2014; Mukhija & Mason, 2013), we propose the concept of “undergreening” to express the systematic reluctance of municipalities to incorporate and provide green infrastructure in communities of color. In this commentary, we identify four axes upon which undergreening manifests within planning. These four axes reflect several approaches to examining undergreening such as distributive injustice, but also expand traditional GI approaches to include procedural and relational issues affecting its implementation. From this, we conclude with four sets of questions and provocations to expand planning perspectives on GI and address planners’ roles in undergreening.","PeriodicalId":47693,"journal":{"name":"Planning Theory & Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"807 - 811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Municipal Undergreening: Framing the Planning Challenges of Implementing Green Infrastructure in Marginalized Communities\",\"authors\":\"D. Rivera, Marccus D. Hendricks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649357.2022.2147340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Green infrastructure (GI) remains a critical tool for addressing and managing environmental risks and hazards, yet its implementation and maintenance remains highly uncertain and inequitable. From the perspectives of climate and environmental justice, GI has repeatedly been shown to entrench inequity through uneven (quality and distribution) implementation (Hendricks et al., 2018; Hendricks & Van Zandt, 2021). Following literature on “municipal underbounding” (Durst, 2014; Mukhija & Mason, 2013), we propose the concept of “undergreening” to express the systematic reluctance of municipalities to incorporate and provide green infrastructure in communities of color. In this commentary, we identify four axes upon which undergreening manifests within planning. These four axes reflect several approaches to examining undergreening such as distributive injustice, but also expand traditional GI approaches to include procedural and relational issues affecting its implementation. From this, we conclude with four sets of questions and provocations to expand planning perspectives on GI and address planners’ roles in undergreening.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"807 - 811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2147340\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2147340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
绿色基础设施(GI)仍然是解决和管理环境风险和危害的关键工具,但其实施和维护仍然高度不确定和不公平。从气候和环境正义的角度来看,地理标志一再被证明通过不平衡的(质量和分布)实施来巩固不平等(Hendricks等人,2018;Hendricks & Van Zandt, 2021)。以下是关于“市政底层”的文献(Durst, 2014;Mukhija & Mason, 2013),我们提出了“绿化”的概念,以表达市政当局在有色人种社区中整合和提供绿色基础设施的系统性不情愿。在这篇评论中,我们确定了绿化在规划中体现的四个轴。这四个轴反映了检查绿化不足的几种方法,如分配不公正,但也扩展了传统的地理标志方法,包括影响其实施的程序和关系问题。在此基础上,我们提出了四组问题和建议,以扩展地理标志的规划视角,并解决规划师在绿化中的作用。
Municipal Undergreening: Framing the Planning Challenges of Implementing Green Infrastructure in Marginalized Communities
Green infrastructure (GI) remains a critical tool for addressing and managing environmental risks and hazards, yet its implementation and maintenance remains highly uncertain and inequitable. From the perspectives of climate and environmental justice, GI has repeatedly been shown to entrench inequity through uneven (quality and distribution) implementation (Hendricks et al., 2018; Hendricks & Van Zandt, 2021). Following literature on “municipal underbounding” (Durst, 2014; Mukhija & Mason, 2013), we propose the concept of “undergreening” to express the systematic reluctance of municipalities to incorporate and provide green infrastructure in communities of color. In this commentary, we identify four axes upon which undergreening manifests within planning. These four axes reflect several approaches to examining undergreening such as distributive injustice, but also expand traditional GI approaches to include procedural and relational issues affecting its implementation. From this, we conclude with four sets of questions and provocations to expand planning perspectives on GI and address planners’ roles in undergreening.
期刊介绍:
Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.