乳腺癌症前哨淋巴结特征类型的淋巴增强超声临床研究

Lifang Jin, Lingling Zhuang, Zhengrong Xia, Chao Jia, Jun Liu, Yubiao Jin, Qiusheng Shi, L. Du
{"title":"乳腺癌症前哨淋巴结特征类型的淋巴增强超声临床研究","authors":"Lifang Jin, Lingling Zhuang, Zhengrong Xia, Chao Jia, Jun Liu, Yubiao Jin, Qiusheng Shi, L. Du","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the diagnostic efficiency in differential diagnosis for breast sentinel lymph nodes, and to analyze the imaging characteristics of involved breast sentinel lymph node in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. \n \n \nMethods \nSixty-one patients suspected with breast cancer from May 2017 to March 2019 in Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University were included in the study. Ultrasound contrast agent was injected subcutaneously, and axillary lymph nodes were displayed under contrast enhanced ultrasound mode. The longitudinal diameter (anteroposterior diameter), transverse diameter, longitudinal/transverse ratio and the distance from skin surface were measured. Five types were concluded according to the imaging characteristics in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound: typeⅠ, uniform enhancement; type Ⅱ, ring-shape enhancement; type Ⅲ, ununiform enhancement; type Ⅳ, regional filling defect; type Ⅴ, total filling defect. Sentinel lymph nodes were guided by wire guides and verified in pathology after excision in the operation. \n \n \nResults \nThe detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 95.08% (58/61). Seventy-seven lymph nodes, including 21 involved nodes and 56 uninvolved nodes were detected by lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound in 58 patients. The longitudinal diameters and transverse diameters of involved lymph nodes were larger than those of uninvolved ones (P=0.001, 0.003). When type Ⅳ(regional filling defect) and type Ⅴ(total filling defect) were classified as involved, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, accuracy and the area under ROC curve of predicting sentinel lymph node metastases were 85.71%, 96.43%, 90.00%, 94.70%, 93.51% and 0.911, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nLymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound reaches a high diagnostic efficiency in qualitative analysis of breast sentinel lymph nodes. Regional filling defect and total filling defect are the imaging characteristics of involved sentinel lymph nodes in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. \n \n \nKey words: \nContrast-enhanced ultrasound; Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Differential diagnose; Diagnostic efficiency","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical study of character types of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound\",\"authors\":\"Lifang Jin, Lingling Zhuang, Zhengrong Xia, Chao Jia, Jun Liu, Yubiao Jin, Qiusheng Shi, L. Du\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.11.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the diagnostic efficiency in differential diagnosis for breast sentinel lymph nodes, and to analyze the imaging characteristics of involved breast sentinel lymph node in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSixty-one patients suspected with breast cancer from May 2017 to March 2019 in Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University were included in the study. Ultrasound contrast agent was injected subcutaneously, and axillary lymph nodes were displayed under contrast enhanced ultrasound mode. The longitudinal diameter (anteroposterior diameter), transverse diameter, longitudinal/transverse ratio and the distance from skin surface were measured. Five types were concluded according to the imaging characteristics in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound: typeⅠ, uniform enhancement; type Ⅱ, ring-shape enhancement; type Ⅲ, ununiform enhancement; type Ⅳ, regional filling defect; type Ⅴ, total filling defect. Sentinel lymph nodes were guided by wire guides and verified in pathology after excision in the operation. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 95.08% (58/61). Seventy-seven lymph nodes, including 21 involved nodes and 56 uninvolved nodes were detected by lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound in 58 patients. The longitudinal diameters and transverse diameters of involved lymph nodes were larger than those of uninvolved ones (P=0.001, 0.003). When type Ⅳ(regional filling defect) and type Ⅴ(total filling defect) were classified as involved, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, accuracy and the area under ROC curve of predicting sentinel lymph node metastases were 85.71%, 96.43%, 90.00%, 94.70%, 93.51% and 0.911, respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nLymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound reaches a high diagnostic efficiency in qualitative analysis of breast sentinel lymph nodes. Regional filling defect and total filling defect are the imaging characteristics of involved sentinel lymph nodes in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nContrast-enhanced ultrasound; Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Differential diagnose; Diagnostic efficiency\",\"PeriodicalId\":10224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.11.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.11.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价乳腺前哨淋巴结的鉴别诊断效率,分析淋巴管增强超声对受累乳腺前哨淋巴结清扫的影像学特征。方法对上海交通大学上海总医院2017年5月至2019年3月收治的61例癌症疑似患者进行研究。皮下注射超声造影剂,在增强超声模式下显示腋窝淋巴结。测量纵向直径(前后径)、横向直径、纵向/横向比以及与皮肤表面的距离。根据淋巴管造影的影像学特点,归纳出五种类型:Ⅰ型,均匀增强;Ⅱ型,环状强化;Ⅲ型,不均匀强化;Ⅳ型,区域性充填缺陷;Ⅴ型,全充填缺陷。前哨淋巴结由导丝引导,并在手术切除后进行病理学验证。结果前哨淋巴结检出率为95.08%(58/61)。58例患者经淋巴管增强超声检查发现77个淋巴结,其中受累淋巴结21个,未受累淋巴结56个。受累淋巴结的纵径和横径均大于未受累淋巴结(P=0.001,0.003)。将Ⅳ型(局部充盈缺损)和Ⅴ型(全充盈缺损)分为受累淋巴结时,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值,预测前哨淋巴结转移的准确率和ROC曲线下面积分别为85.71%、96.43%、90.00%、94.70%、93.51%和0.911。结论淋巴造影增强超声对乳腺前哨淋巴结的定性分析具有较高的诊断效率。淋巴管造影超声显示前哨淋巴结受累的影像学特征为局部充盈缺损和全充盈缺损。关键词:超声造影;癌症;哨兵淋巴结;鉴别诊断;诊断效率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The clinical study of character types of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency in differential diagnosis for breast sentinel lymph nodes, and to analyze the imaging characteristics of involved breast sentinel lymph node in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. Methods Sixty-one patients suspected with breast cancer from May 2017 to March 2019 in Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University were included in the study. Ultrasound contrast agent was injected subcutaneously, and axillary lymph nodes were displayed under contrast enhanced ultrasound mode. The longitudinal diameter (anteroposterior diameter), transverse diameter, longitudinal/transverse ratio and the distance from skin surface were measured. Five types were concluded according to the imaging characteristics in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound: typeⅠ, uniform enhancement; type Ⅱ, ring-shape enhancement; type Ⅲ, ununiform enhancement; type Ⅳ, regional filling defect; type Ⅴ, total filling defect. Sentinel lymph nodes were guided by wire guides and verified in pathology after excision in the operation. Results The detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 95.08% (58/61). Seventy-seven lymph nodes, including 21 involved nodes and 56 uninvolved nodes were detected by lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound in 58 patients. The longitudinal diameters and transverse diameters of involved lymph nodes were larger than those of uninvolved ones (P=0.001, 0.003). When type Ⅳ(regional filling defect) and type Ⅴ(total filling defect) were classified as involved, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, accuracy and the area under ROC curve of predicting sentinel lymph node metastases were 85.71%, 96.43%, 90.00%, 94.70%, 93.51% and 0.911, respectively. Conclusions Lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound reaches a high diagnostic efficiency in qualitative analysis of breast sentinel lymph nodes. Regional filling defect and total filling defect are the imaging characteristics of involved sentinel lymph nodes in lymphatic contrast enhanced ultrasound. Key words: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Differential diagnose; Diagnostic efficiency
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1