{"title":"政治精英对普拉博沃在Kompas.com和Republika.com上题为“印度尼西亚Punah”的演讲的回应话语","authors":"T. Sobari, E. Damayanti","doi":"10.21512/HUMANIORA.V12I1.6563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of research was developed by the responses of political elites to the statements of figures. The research problem was how the discourse of response and aligments from Prabowo speech entitled “Indonesia Punah” published in Kompas.com and Republika.com, which were the material objects of the research. A qualitative approach combined with a descriptive analysis techniques were applied in the research. Analysis was done by using Michael Foucault`s power relation theory. The research indicates that Kompas’ writing style tends to accentuate Jokowi’s government side as a comparison in responding to Prabowo’s speech. As for Republika, it dominates a clear description of the figure who gives the response. Then, the results of the power relations between Moeldoko and Hidayat Nur Wahid show that Moeldoko comments on behalf of the government by linking Jokowi’s performance. Meanwhile, Hidayat Nur Wahid gives a response to save the reputation of the stigma embedded in him, namely the religious figure, deputy chairman of the People`s Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia, and Prabowo’s party bearer cadre.","PeriodicalId":30545,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Elites’ Response Discourse towards Prabowo’s Speech Entitled “Indonesia Punah” on Kompas.com and Republika.com\",\"authors\":\"T. Sobari, E. Damayanti\",\"doi\":\"10.21512/HUMANIORA.V12I1.6563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The background of research was developed by the responses of political elites to the statements of figures. The research problem was how the discourse of response and aligments from Prabowo speech entitled “Indonesia Punah” published in Kompas.com and Republika.com, which were the material objects of the research. A qualitative approach combined with a descriptive analysis techniques were applied in the research. Analysis was done by using Michael Foucault`s power relation theory. The research indicates that Kompas’ writing style tends to accentuate Jokowi’s government side as a comparison in responding to Prabowo’s speech. As for Republika, it dominates a clear description of the figure who gives the response. Then, the results of the power relations between Moeldoko and Hidayat Nur Wahid show that Moeldoko comments on behalf of the government by linking Jokowi’s performance. Meanwhile, Hidayat Nur Wahid gives a response to save the reputation of the stigma embedded in him, namely the religious figure, deputy chairman of the People`s Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia, and Prabowo’s party bearer cadre.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humaniora\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21512/HUMANIORA.V12I1.6563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/HUMANIORA.V12I1.6563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
研究的背景是政治精英对人物陈述的回应。研究的问题是如何对Prabowo在Kompas.com和Republika.com上发表的题为“Indonesia Punah”的演讲的话语进行回应和对齐,这是研究的物质对象。本研究采用定性分析与描述性分析相结合的方法。运用福柯的权力关系理论进行分析。研究表明,在回应普拉博沃的演讲时,孔帕斯的写作风格倾向于强调佐科威政府的一面。至于《共和》,它主导了对给出回应的人物的清晰描述。然后,Moeldoko与Hidayat Nur Wahid之间的权力关系结果表明,Moeldoko通过将佐科的表现联系起来,代表政府发表评论。与此同时,希达亚特·努尔·瓦希德(Hidayat Nur Wahid)给出了一个回应,以挽救嵌入在他身上的耻辱的声誉,即宗教人士,印度尼西亚共和国人民协商会议(MPR)副主席,以及普拉博沃(Prabowo)的政党干部。
The Political Elites’ Response Discourse towards Prabowo’s Speech Entitled “Indonesia Punah” on Kompas.com and Republika.com
The background of research was developed by the responses of political elites to the statements of figures. The research problem was how the discourse of response and aligments from Prabowo speech entitled “Indonesia Punah” published in Kompas.com and Republika.com, which were the material objects of the research. A qualitative approach combined with a descriptive analysis techniques were applied in the research. Analysis was done by using Michael Foucault`s power relation theory. The research indicates that Kompas’ writing style tends to accentuate Jokowi’s government side as a comparison in responding to Prabowo’s speech. As for Republika, it dominates a clear description of the figure who gives the response. Then, the results of the power relations between Moeldoko and Hidayat Nur Wahid show that Moeldoko comments on behalf of the government by linking Jokowi’s performance. Meanwhile, Hidayat Nur Wahid gives a response to save the reputation of the stigma embedded in him, namely the religious figure, deputy chairman of the People`s Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia, and Prabowo’s party bearer cadre.