在轻罪之外

Q2 Social Sciences Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263
K. Beckett
{"title":"在轻罪之外","authors":"K. Beckett","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misdemeanorland provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the lower courts’ response to the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City and the flood of arrests this generated in the 1990s and 2000s. Drawing on administrative police and court data, as well as extensive ethnographic observations and interviews with court actors and defendants, Kohler-Hausmann argues that the work of the lower courts, at least in New York City, is best understood as a form of “managerial justice” in which court actors seek to manage people whose governability has been called into question by their arrest. This mode of justice involves requiring and evaluating their interaction with the courts over time – often long periods of time. In developing this conceptual model, and by drawing on rich empirical data to bring its existence and effects to life, Misdemeanorland makes an invaluable contribution to the burgeoning literature on courts and social control more generally. Kohler-Hausmann begins by noting that many more people are arrested for misdemeanor offenses than for felonies, and that many of those entangled in the world of the lower courts are, in the end, neither convicted nor jailed. Still, she emphasises, this entanglement often has a range of destabilising effects and, in the aggregate, reinforce race and class inequality. Insofar as the relevant literature tends to focus on the felony side of the system, it fails to capture the reach of the criminal justice system and misrepresents the typical criminal justice encounter. Understanding how court processes and non-custodial sanctions create a diffuse and consequential mode of social control requires that we attend to the operations and effects of the lower courts. Kohler-Hausmann is particularly interested in how lower-court actors responded to the dramatic uptick in arrests that resulted from the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City. Broken ∗Katherine Beckett is Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Email: kbeckett@wu.edu Criminal Justice Ethics, 2019 Vol. 38, No. 3, 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":"38 1","pages":"221 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In and Beyond Misdemeanorland\",\"authors\":\"K. Beckett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Misdemeanorland provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the lower courts’ response to the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City and the flood of arrests this generated in the 1990s and 2000s. Drawing on administrative police and court data, as well as extensive ethnographic observations and interviews with court actors and defendants, Kohler-Hausmann argues that the work of the lower courts, at least in New York City, is best understood as a form of “managerial justice” in which court actors seek to manage people whose governability has been called into question by their arrest. This mode of justice involves requiring and evaluating their interaction with the courts over time – often long periods of time. In developing this conceptual model, and by drawing on rich empirical data to bring its existence and effects to life, Misdemeanorland makes an invaluable contribution to the burgeoning literature on courts and social control more generally. Kohler-Hausmann begins by noting that many more people are arrested for misdemeanor offenses than for felonies, and that many of those entangled in the world of the lower courts are, in the end, neither convicted nor jailed. Still, she emphasises, this entanglement often has a range of destabilising effects and, in the aggregate, reinforce race and class inequality. Insofar as the relevant literature tends to focus on the felony side of the system, it fails to capture the reach of the criminal justice system and misrepresents the typical criminal justice encounter. Understanding how court processes and non-custodial sanctions create a diffuse and consequential mode of social control requires that we attend to the operations and effects of the lower courts. Kohler-Hausmann is particularly interested in how lower-court actors responded to the dramatic uptick in arrests that resulted from the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City. Broken ∗Katherine Beckett is Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Email: kbeckett@wu.edu Criminal Justice Ethics, 2019 Vol. 38, No. 3, 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263\",\"PeriodicalId\":35931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Ethics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《轻罪之地》一书全面而深刻地分析了下级法院对纽约市实施破窗警务的反应,以及20世纪90年代和21世纪初产生的大量逮捕行动。根据行政警察和法院的数据,以及广泛的人种学观察和对法院行为者和被告的采访,Kohler-Hausmann认为,至少在纽约市,下级法院的工作最好被理解为一种“管理正义”的形式,在这种形式中,法院行为者试图管理那些因被捕而被质疑其治理能力的人。这种司法模式涉及要求和评估他们在一段时间内——通常是很长一段时间——与法院的互动。在发展这一概念模型的过程中,并通过利用丰富的经验数据将其存在和影响带入生活,轻罪地对法庭和社会控制的新兴文献做出了宝贵的贡献。Kohler-Hausmann首先指出,因轻罪被捕的人比因重罪被捕的人多得多,而且许多被卷入低级法院的人最终既没有被定罪,也没有被监禁。不过,她强调,这种纠缠往往会产生一系列破坏稳定的影响,总的来说,会加剧种族和阶级的不平等。只要相关文献倾向于关注该系统的重罪方面,它就无法捕捉到刑事司法系统的范围,并歪曲了典型的刑事司法遭遇。要理解法院程序和非监禁制裁如何创造一种分散的、后果严重的社会控制模式,我们就必须关注下级法院的运作和效果。Kohler-Hausmann特别感兴趣的是,下级法院的演员如何应对纽约市实施“破窗警务”导致的逮捕人数急剧上升。凯瑟琳·贝克特(Katherine Beckett),美国华盛顿州西雅图市华盛顿大学社会学系教授。电子邮件:kbeckett@wu.edu刑事司法伦理,2019年第38卷第3期,221-229,https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In and Beyond Misdemeanorland
Misdemeanorland provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the lower courts’ response to the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City and the flood of arrests this generated in the 1990s and 2000s. Drawing on administrative police and court data, as well as extensive ethnographic observations and interviews with court actors and defendants, Kohler-Hausmann argues that the work of the lower courts, at least in New York City, is best understood as a form of “managerial justice” in which court actors seek to manage people whose governability has been called into question by their arrest. This mode of justice involves requiring and evaluating their interaction with the courts over time – often long periods of time. In developing this conceptual model, and by drawing on rich empirical data to bring its existence and effects to life, Misdemeanorland makes an invaluable contribution to the burgeoning literature on courts and social control more generally. Kohler-Hausmann begins by noting that many more people are arrested for misdemeanor offenses than for felonies, and that many of those entangled in the world of the lower courts are, in the end, neither convicted nor jailed. Still, she emphasises, this entanglement often has a range of destabilising effects and, in the aggregate, reinforce race and class inequality. Insofar as the relevant literature tends to focus on the felony side of the system, it fails to capture the reach of the criminal justice system and misrepresents the typical criminal justice encounter. Understanding how court processes and non-custodial sanctions create a diffuse and consequential mode of social control requires that we attend to the operations and effects of the lower courts. Kohler-Hausmann is particularly interested in how lower-court actors responded to the dramatic uptick in arrests that resulted from the implementation of Broken Windows Policing in New York City. Broken ∗Katherine Beckett is Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Email: kbeckett@wu.edu Criminal Justice Ethics, 2019 Vol. 38, No. 3, 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2019.1682263
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Ethics
Criminal Justice Ethics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Exposing, Reversing, and Inheriting Crimes as Traumas from the Neurosciences to Epigenetics: Why Criminal Law Cannot Yet Afford A(nother) Biology-induced Overhaul Institutional Corruption, Institutional Corrosion and Collective Responsibility Sentencing, Artificial Intelligence, and Condemnation: A Reply to Taylor Double Jeopardy, Autrefois Acquit and the Legal Ethics of the Rule Against Unreasonably Splitting a Case Ethical Resource Allocation in Policing: Why Policing Requires a Different Approach from Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1