“暧昧的亲情之路”:威廉斯、本杰明、科里和豪的诗学史

Karen M. Cardozo
{"title":"“暧昧的亲情之路”:威廉斯、本杰明、科里和豪的诗学史","authors":"Karen M. Cardozo","doi":"10.5325/WILLCARLWILLREVI.38.1.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Expanding on the concept of essaying democracy as evinced in the post/modern intertextual relations between Williams, Maxine Hong Kingston and Richard Rodriguez around In the American Grain, this article deploys a similar intertextual approach to illuminate a related mode of poetic history enacted by Williams, Walter Benjamin, Joshua Corey and Susan Howe. Linking Benjamin’s philosophy of history, the concept of aura in the work of art, theory of translation and related notions of tactility, it argues that the transtemporal kinship of these different writers is forged by a shared understanding of poetic history as a countervailing force to the limits of empiricism and dangers of official history—an aesthetic and ethical mode of translation that, however fleetingly, strives to touch the truth of the past.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":"38 1","pages":"21 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Ambiguous Paths of Kinship”: Poetic History in Williams, Benjamin, Corey, and Howe\",\"authors\":\"Karen M. Cardozo\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/WILLCARLWILLREVI.38.1.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Expanding on the concept of essaying democracy as evinced in the post/modern intertextual relations between Williams, Maxine Hong Kingston and Richard Rodriguez around In the American Grain, this article deploys a similar intertextual approach to illuminate a related mode of poetic history enacted by Williams, Walter Benjamin, Joshua Corey and Susan Howe. Linking Benjamin’s philosophy of history, the concept of aura in the work of art, theory of translation and related notions of tactility, it argues that the transtemporal kinship of these different writers is forged by a shared understanding of poetic history as a countervailing force to the limits of empiricism and dangers of official history—an aesthetic and ethical mode of translation that, however fleetingly, strives to touch the truth of the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/WILLCARLWILLREVI.38.1.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/WILLCARLWILLREVI.38.1.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文从威廉姆斯、洪、金斯顿和理查德·罗德里格斯在《美国的谷物》前后的后现代互文关系中所表现出的“尝试民主”的概念出发,运用类似的互文方法来阐释威廉姆斯、本雅明、乔舒亚·科里和苏珊·豪所制定的一种相关的诗歌史模式。它将本雅明的历史哲学、艺术作品中的光环概念、翻译理论和相关的触觉概念联系起来,认为这些不同作家的跨时空亲缘关系是由对诗歌历史的共同理解所形成的,诗歌历史是对经验主义和官方历史危险的一种制衡力量——一种美学和伦理的翻译模式,无论多么短暂,他都努力触摸过去的真相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Ambiguous Paths of Kinship”: Poetic History in Williams, Benjamin, Corey, and Howe
abstract:Expanding on the concept of essaying democracy as evinced in the post/modern intertextual relations between Williams, Maxine Hong Kingston and Richard Rodriguez around In the American Grain, this article deploys a similar intertextual approach to illuminate a related mode of poetic history enacted by Williams, Walter Benjamin, Joshua Corey and Susan Howe. Linking Benjamin’s philosophy of history, the concept of aura in the work of art, theory of translation and related notions of tactility, it argues that the transtemporal kinship of these different writers is forged by a shared understanding of poetic history as a countervailing force to the limits of empiricism and dangers of official history—an aesthetic and ethical mode of translation that, however fleetingly, strives to touch the truth of the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Invisible Labor in William Carlos Williams A New Language for a New Perception: A Study of the Influence of Chinese Poetry on the Composition of Spring and All William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson Wellcome: The Conflict of the Doctor Persona and the Christian Science Anima William Carlos Williams Bibliography 2022 William Carlos Williams and the Subject of Aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1