Dicky Rachmawan, Francisia Saveria Sika Ery Seda, Robert Siburian, Danang Kuncara Sakti
{"title":"两个参考组中的效益、观点和替代性社会林业计划,盖帽","authors":"Dicky Rachmawan, Francisia Saveria Sika Ery Seda, Robert Siburian, Danang Kuncara Sakti","doi":"10.20886/jpsek.2022.19.1.29-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social forestry program expected to give space for people in forest management, improve livelihood, and conserve the environment at once to decrease poverty rate on people who live around the forest. This article aims to describe the benefit of community member which is complemented by deepening of view and alternative of social forestry program in Kelompok Tani Hutan Gunung Gajah Lestari (KTH GGL) and Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan Rawa Sakti (LMDH RS). Qualitative approach in case study form is used which interview 49 informants include managements and members that accompanied by focus group discussion as data triangulation which processed by Nvivo application and Microsoft Excel. The result shows social forestry program has viewed giving benefit although it felt not optimal by the members in both groups. However, rough calculation on utilization of forest areas tends possibly to contribute around Rp.1,5-3 million rupiah/planting period. The utilization of forest areas is revival means or additional income where social-economic context is needed to be understood on identify commodity alternative that can be developed in the further time. The rest is the need for natural science approach which can answer the confusion of community to find alternatives commodity which more give revenue.","PeriodicalId":31807,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manfaat, Pandangan, Dan Alternatif Program Perhutanan Sosial Di Dua Kelompok Rujukan, Kabupaten Pemalang\",\"authors\":\"Dicky Rachmawan, Francisia Saveria Sika Ery Seda, Robert Siburian, Danang Kuncara Sakti\",\"doi\":\"10.20886/jpsek.2022.19.1.29-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social forestry program expected to give space for people in forest management, improve livelihood, and conserve the environment at once to decrease poverty rate on people who live around the forest. This article aims to describe the benefit of community member which is complemented by deepening of view and alternative of social forestry program in Kelompok Tani Hutan Gunung Gajah Lestari (KTH GGL) and Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan Rawa Sakti (LMDH RS). Qualitative approach in case study form is used which interview 49 informants include managements and members that accompanied by focus group discussion as data triangulation which processed by Nvivo application and Microsoft Excel. The result shows social forestry program has viewed giving benefit although it felt not optimal by the members in both groups. However, rough calculation on utilization of forest areas tends possibly to contribute around Rp.1,5-3 million rupiah/planting period. The utilization of forest areas is revival means or additional income where social-economic context is needed to be understood on identify commodity alternative that can be developed in the further time. The rest is the need for natural science approach which can answer the confusion of community to find alternatives commodity which more give revenue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2022.19.1.29-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2022.19.1.29-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
社会林业计划有望为人们提供森林管理空间,改善生计,同时保护环境,以降低森林周围居民的贫困率。本文旨在描述社区成员的利益,并通过深化Kelopok Tani Hutan Gunung Gajah Lestari(KTH GGL)和Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan Rawa Sakti(LMDH RS)的社会林业计划的观点和替代方案来补充。采用案例研究形式的定性方法,对49名知情者进行访谈,其中包括管理层和成员,并通过Nvivo应用程序和Microsoft Excel进行数据三角测量,进行焦点小组讨论。结果表明,尽管两组成员都认为社会林业计划并不是最佳的,但社会林业计划一直在考虑给予利益。然而,对森林面积利用率的粗略计算可能会贡献约150万至300万卢比/种植期。森林地区的利用是复兴手段或额外收入,需要了解社会经济背景,以确定未来可以开发的商品替代品。剩下的是对自然科学方法的需求,这种方法可以解决社区的困惑,找到更能带来收入的替代商品。
Manfaat, Pandangan, Dan Alternatif Program Perhutanan Sosial Di Dua Kelompok Rujukan, Kabupaten Pemalang
Social forestry program expected to give space for people in forest management, improve livelihood, and conserve the environment at once to decrease poverty rate on people who live around the forest. This article aims to describe the benefit of community member which is complemented by deepening of view and alternative of social forestry program in Kelompok Tani Hutan Gunung Gajah Lestari (KTH GGL) and Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan Rawa Sakti (LMDH RS). Qualitative approach in case study form is used which interview 49 informants include managements and members that accompanied by focus group discussion as data triangulation which processed by Nvivo application and Microsoft Excel. The result shows social forestry program has viewed giving benefit although it felt not optimal by the members in both groups. However, rough calculation on utilization of forest areas tends possibly to contribute around Rp.1,5-3 million rupiah/planting period. The utilization of forest areas is revival means or additional income where social-economic context is needed to be understood on identify commodity alternative that can be developed in the further time. The rest is the need for natural science approach which can answer the confusion of community to find alternatives commodity which more give revenue.