促进老年人身体活动和认知灵活性的积极干预

Weiyun Chen, Zhanjia Zhang, B. Giordani, J. Larson
{"title":"促进老年人身体活动和认知灵活性的积极干预","authors":"Weiyun Chen, Zhanjia Zhang, B. Giordani, J. Larson","doi":"10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical activity<strong> </strong>is essential to delaying cognitive decline and preventing cognitive impairment in older adults. We designed and implemented two-level 4Active intervention for older adults living in retirement communities. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the 4Active intervention in increasing physical activity and cognitive function in older adults. Fifty-eight eligible older adults with a mean age of 83.83 years (76.3% females) living in two retirement communities voluntarily participated in this study. Forty subjects participated in the two-level 4Active intervention for 12 weeks and 18 subjects were in the control group. Each participant was pre-and posted tested on physical activity (PA) and cognitive flexibility.<strong> </strong>Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, and<strong> </strong>Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures. ANCOVA with repeated measures indicated that the intervention group had overall higher levels of the total PA and the moderate PA than the control group (<em>F</em> = 11.838, <em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.180; <em>F</em> = 11.068, <em>p</em> = 0.002, <em>η<sup>2 </sup></em>= 0.170). For light PA, ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between time and group (<em>F</em> = 8.477, <em>p</em> = 0.005, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.136). The intervention group showed increases in light PA (walking) with a medium effect size (Cohen’s <em>d </em>= 0.538) over time, while the control group decreased light PA from baseline to the post-test. Regarding the results of cognitive flexibility, the ANCOVA with repeated measures revealed that intervention group had overall higher levels of cognitive function compared to the control group (<em>F</em> = 7.88, <em>p</em> = 0.007, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.129). Both groups showed significant increases in cognitive flexibility over time (<em>F</em> = 6.68, <em>p</em> = 0.013, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.112), but the intervention group had a smaller change in cognitive flexibility over time compared to the control group (<em>F</em> = 6.75, <em>p</em> = 0.012, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.113). Engaging in technology-enhanced multicomponent exercises is an effective approach to contributing to physically active and cognitively competent aging.","PeriodicalId":74332,"journal":{"name":"OBM geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4Active Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity and Cognitive Flexibility Among Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Weiyun Chen, Zhanjia Zhang, B. Giordani, J. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical activity<strong> </strong>is essential to delaying cognitive decline and preventing cognitive impairment in older adults. We designed and implemented two-level 4Active intervention for older adults living in retirement communities. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the 4Active intervention in increasing physical activity and cognitive function in older adults. Fifty-eight eligible older adults with a mean age of 83.83 years (76.3% females) living in two retirement communities voluntarily participated in this study. Forty subjects participated in the two-level 4Active intervention for 12 weeks and 18 subjects were in the control group. Each participant was pre-and posted tested on physical activity (PA) and cognitive flexibility.<strong> </strong>Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, and<strong> </strong>Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures. ANCOVA with repeated measures indicated that the intervention group had overall higher levels of the total PA and the moderate PA than the control group (<em>F</em> = 11.838, <em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.180; <em>F</em> = 11.068, <em>p</em> = 0.002, <em>η<sup>2 </sup></em>= 0.170). For light PA, ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between time and group (<em>F</em> = 8.477, <em>p</em> = 0.005, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.136). The intervention group showed increases in light PA (walking) with a medium effect size (Cohen’s <em>d </em>= 0.538) over time, while the control group decreased light PA from baseline to the post-test. Regarding the results of cognitive flexibility, the ANCOVA with repeated measures revealed that intervention group had overall higher levels of cognitive function compared to the control group (<em>F</em> = 7.88, <em>p</em> = 0.007, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.129). Both groups showed significant increases in cognitive flexibility over time (<em>F</em> = 6.68, <em>p</em> = 0.013, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.112), but the intervention group had a smaller change in cognitive flexibility over time compared to the control group (<em>F</em> = 6.75, <em>p</em> = 0.012, <em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.113). Engaging in technology-enhanced multicomponent exercises is an effective approach to contributing to physically active and cognitively competent aging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OBM geriatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OBM geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身体活动对于延缓老年人认知能力下降和预防认知障碍至关重要。我们为生活在退休社区的老年人设计并实施了两级4主动干预。这项研究旨在检验4Active干预在增加老年人身体活动和认知功能方面的有效性。58名平均年龄为83.83岁的老年人自愿参加了本研究,其中76.3%为女性。40名受试者参加为期12周的两级4级积极干预,18名受试者为对照组。每个参与者都接受了身体活动(PA)和认知灵活性的测试。采用描述性统计、独立样本t检验和重复测量的协方差分析(ANCOVA)对数据进行分析。重复测量的ANCOVA结果显示,干预组患者的总PA和中度PA水平均高于对照组(F = 11.838, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.180;F = 11.068, p = 0.002, η = 0.170)。对于轻度PA, ANCOVA显示时间与组间交互作用显著(F = 8.477, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.136)。干预组轻度PA(步行)随时间增加,具有中等效应量(Cohen’s d = 0.538),而对照组从基线到测试后轻度PA下降。关于认知灵活性的结果,重复测量的ANCOVA结果显示,干预组的整体认知功能水平高于对照组(F = 7.88, p = 0.007, η2 = 0.129)。两组患者的认知灵活性随时间的推移均显著增加(F = 6.68, p = 0.013, η2 = 0.112),但干预组患者的认知灵活性随时间的变化小于对照组(F = 6.75, p = 0.012, η2 = 0.113)。参与技术增强的多成分练习是促进身体活跃和认知能力的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4Active Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity and Cognitive Flexibility Among Older Adults
Physical activity is essential to delaying cognitive decline and preventing cognitive impairment in older adults. We designed and implemented two-level 4Active intervention for older adults living in retirement communities. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the 4Active intervention in increasing physical activity and cognitive function in older adults. Fifty-eight eligible older adults with a mean age of 83.83 years (76.3% females) living in two retirement communities voluntarily participated in this study. Forty subjects participated in the two-level 4Active intervention for 12 weeks and 18 subjects were in the control group. Each participant was pre-and posted tested on physical activity (PA) and cognitive flexibility. Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures. ANCOVA with repeated measures indicated that the intervention group had overall higher levels of the total PA and the moderate PA than the control group (F = 11.838, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.180; F = 11.068, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.170). For light PA, ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between time and group (F = 8.477, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.136). The intervention group showed increases in light PA (walking) with a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.538) over time, while the control group decreased light PA from baseline to the post-test. Regarding the results of cognitive flexibility, the ANCOVA with repeated measures revealed that intervention group had overall higher levels of cognitive function compared to the control group (F = 7.88, p = 0.007, η2 = 0.129). Both groups showed significant increases in cognitive flexibility over time (F = 6.68, p = 0.013, η2 = 0.112), but the intervention group had a smaller change in cognitive flexibility over time compared to the control group (F = 6.75, p = 0.012, η2 = 0.113). Engaging in technology-enhanced multicomponent exercises is an effective approach to contributing to physically active and cognitively competent aging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practices Used in Health and Social Services for the Management of Mistreatment Situations towards Adults in a Context of Gender and Sexual Diversity: A Scoping Review Integrating Palliative Medicine into Medical Education: Creating a More Compassionate Generation of Physicians Exploration of Dementia Help Seeking Behaviours Amongst UK South Asian Communities: A Systematic Review Impact of Sex and Gender Differences on Heart Failure, Especially in Elderly Patients Mental Health among the Elderly in Nepal: Special Emphasis on Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1