健康科学类大学生电子健康信息素养的现状与提高策略

S. Ennaceur, B. Bugis, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef
{"title":"健康科学类大学生电子健康信息素养的现状与提高策略","authors":"S. Ennaceur, B. Bugis, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef","doi":"10.1080/1941126X.2023.2197749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study aimed to measure the e-health information competencies for health science students in finding, evaluating and judging e-health information. Adapted measurement tools were used to assess the e-health information literacy. A total of 151 students accepted to participate. Few students (25) were able to locate the appropriate information using the necessary keywords and commands. Only 33.1% of the participants could distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly sources of information. A very weak correlation was registered between the actual and the self-evaluation skill levels. Students intended to improve many health information search skills such as library database through different methods.","PeriodicalId":39383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"e-Health information literacy of health science university students: actual situation and Improvement strategies\",\"authors\":\"S. Ennaceur, B. Bugis, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1941126X.2023.2197749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The present study aimed to measure the e-health information competencies for health science students in finding, evaluating and judging e-health information. Adapted measurement tools were used to assess the e-health information literacy. A total of 151 students accepted to participate. Few students (25) were able to locate the appropriate information using the necessary keywords and commands. Only 33.1% of the participants could distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly sources of information. A very weak correlation was registered between the actual and the self-evaluation skill levels. Students intended to improve many health information search skills such as library database through different methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2023.2197749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2023.2197749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在衡量健康科学专业学生在发现、评估和判断电子健康信息方面的电子健康信息能力。使用了经过调整的测量工具来评估电子健康信息素养。共有151名学生被录取参加。很少有学生(25名)能够使用必要的关键词和命令找到合适的信息。只有33.1%的参与者能够区分学术和非学术信息来源。实际技能水平与自我评价技能水平之间的相关性非常弱。学生们打算通过不同的方法来提高许多健康信息搜索技能,如图书馆数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
e-Health information literacy of health science university students: actual situation and Improvement strategies
Abstract The present study aimed to measure the e-health information competencies for health science students in finding, evaluating and judging e-health information. Adapted measurement tools were used to assess the e-health information literacy. A total of 151 students accepted to participate. Few students (25) were able to locate the appropriate information using the necessary keywords and commands. Only 33.1% of the participants could distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly sources of information. A very weak correlation was registered between the actual and the self-evaluation skill levels. Students intended to improve many health information search skills such as library database through different methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: A journal for information professionals who work with managing electronic resources in libraries The Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship (renamed from The Acquisitions Librarian to reflect the journal"s broader focus) provides a much-needed scholarly forum for librarians and other information professionals. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal addresses evolving work-related processes and procedure, current research, and the latest news on topics related to electronic resources and the digital environment"s impact on collecting, acquiring, and making accessible library materials. The journal provides opinion pieces, the latest news, book reviews, conference presentations, and e-resources related updates.
期刊最新文献
Are we relying on the wrong data? Analysis of e-journal usage data at seven R1 and R2 research universities E-Resource Round Up Column for the Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship Volume 35, Issue 4 Examination of academic librarian websites in Anglophonic countries to assess the integrity of information related to predatory publishing A platform to meet evolving collections and access needs: a review of Article Galaxy Scholar Neal-Schuman Library Technology Companion: A Basic Guide for Library Staff. 6th ed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1