{"title":"特权错觉","authors":"Schnequa N. Diggs","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2021.1984102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using critical race theory (CRT), this article examines the ideology of privilege within White supremacy thought permeating the Administrative State. Through systems of privilege, the experiences of disadvantaged groups are masked by dominant narratives and used to validate status quo perspectives. To this point, privilege fuels the oppressive state of racial dominance, in American society, and is legitimized through the subtle language within the administrative practice.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"44 1","pages":"105 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The delusion of privilege\",\"authors\":\"Schnequa N. Diggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10841806.2021.1984102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Using critical race theory (CRT), this article examines the ideology of privilege within White supremacy thought permeating the Administrative State. Through systems of privilege, the experiences of disadvantaged groups are masked by dominant narratives and used to validate status quo perspectives. To this point, privilege fuels the oppressive state of racial dominance, in American society, and is legitimized through the subtle language within the administrative practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1984102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1984102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Using critical race theory (CRT), this article examines the ideology of privilege within White supremacy thought permeating the Administrative State. Through systems of privilege, the experiences of disadvantaged groups are masked by dominant narratives and used to validate status quo perspectives. To this point, privilege fuels the oppressive state of racial dominance, in American society, and is legitimized through the subtle language within the administrative practice.