宽容、世俗化和后形而上学思想。哈贝马斯与灯光

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN ETUDES GERMANIQUES Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI:10.3917/EGER.299.0425
Maiwenn Roudaut
{"title":"宽容、世俗化和后形而上学思想。哈贝马斯与灯光","authors":"Maiwenn Roudaut","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"425-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolérance, sécularisation et pensée postmétaphysique. Habermas et les Lumières\",\"authors\":\"Maiwenn Roudaut\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/EGER.299.0425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"425-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从宽容问题的角度考察了哈贝马斯哲学的启蒙遗产。哈贝马斯在其关于宗教的最新著作中(特别是Zwischen Naturalimus und religion,2005年和Nachmetaphysiches Denken II,2012年),承认宗教在西方民主国家中的新活力。他讨论了宗教社会学家对世俗化进程的最新思考,以及世俗化与当代社会现代化的联系,迄今为止,这一直被认为是理所当然的。这使他开始质疑启蒙运动及其“文化”的潜力。在这样做的过程中,法兰克福哲学家是否沉溺于一种“理性的失败主义”(让-克洛德·莫诺德)?还是我们应该将哈贝马斯的怀疑视为他对政治前社会团结来源的新兴趣的证明?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tolérance, sécularisation et pensée postmétaphysique. Habermas et les Lumières
This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ETUDES GERMANIQUES
ETUDES GERMANIQUES LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: La revue Études germaniques a pour but d"informer avec un grand souci d"impartialité et d"objectivité scientifique tous ceux qui s"intéressent à la vie du monde germanique (Allemagne, Suisse, pays scandinaves et néerlandais, études yiddish et judéo-allemandes), aussi bien sur des questions qui touchent à la linguistique, à la littérature, à l"histoire, à la philosophie, à l"art, à la religion — en un mot à la civilisation — qu"à celles qui relèvent de l"actualité et qui sont étudiées dans un esprit de savants et non de partisans.
期刊最新文献
Espaces et systèmes des Inscriptiones de Samuel Quiccheberg, point d’ancrage du musée du xxi e siècle ? Le problème de l’éthique et le visage de l’autre. Martin Buber et Emmanuel Levinas en dialogue Canetti als Anti-Nietzsche La volonté de transparence dans la politique muséale des Pays-Bas ou comment apprendre à faire face aux dangers Le plan et le parcours. Guider le visiteur dans la galerie impériale et royale de Vienne à la fin du xviii e siècle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1