使国际空间站的创新研究能够解决人类火星任务的挑战:2020-2021年ISS4Mars国际研讨会的结果

Q1 Physics and Astronomy REACH Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reach.2022.100047
Michael Waid , Livio Narici , Michaela Girgenrath , Katrin Stang , Isabelle Marcil , Perry Johnson-Green , Thu Jennifer Ngo-Anh , Oleg Kotov , Keiji Murakami , Robert Dempsey , Jancy McPhee , Kevin Sato , Bette Siegel , Sam Scimemi , Julie Robinson
{"title":"使国际空间站的创新研究能够解决人类火星任务的挑战:2020-2021年ISS4Mars国际研讨会的结果","authors":"Michael Waid ,&nbsp;Livio Narici ,&nbsp;Michaela Girgenrath ,&nbsp;Katrin Stang ,&nbsp;Isabelle Marcil ,&nbsp;Perry Johnson-Green ,&nbsp;Thu Jennifer Ngo-Anh ,&nbsp;Oleg Kotov ,&nbsp;Keiji Murakami ,&nbsp;Robert Dempsey ,&nbsp;Jancy McPhee ,&nbsp;Kevin Sato ,&nbsp;Bette Siegel ,&nbsp;Sam Scimemi ,&nbsp;Julie Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.reach.2022.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>During the ISS4Mars workshops in 2020–2021, personnel from the International Space Station (ISS) partner agencies convened to reflect on scenarios for how the ISS could be used and its operations possibly modified to simulate aspects of a human mission to Mars. Scientific leaders, operations experts, crewmembers, managers, and flight surgeons discussed the five hazards of human spaceflight—gravity transitions, radiation, isolation and confinement<span>, distance from Earth, and hostile closed environments—and considered how an ISS-based analog of Mars transit could benefit assessments and mitigations of these hazards. A focused writing team then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each approach identified by the workshop participants before developing a set of eight use cases to consider the feasibility of implementing on the ISS. The writing team also identified the prerequisites needed, including ground analog studies simulating a mission to Mars required to verify measurements and procedures, before testing could begin on the ISS. Five of the use cases were considered feasible to assess in simulations using an ISS-based analog of Mars transit if some ground rules and assumptions were met. These five use cases were Earth-independent medical operations, Earth-independent integrated operations, life support and food for a one year duration, lower-body negative pressure as a countermeasure against the effects of exposure to microgravity, and fitness levels after landing. In addition, three more extensive interventions—extended </span></span>Mars surface<span><span> operations, a small-volume transit analog, and artificial gravity—were deemed unfeasible for testing on the ISS. Experience gained from the five use cases executed on the ISS may help answer some of the questions in the deferred scenarios, or it may be possible to complete them on another platform (e.g. commercial space station, lunar habitat). Simulating conditions during a Mars mission on the ISS will afford higher fidelity for assessing multiple integrated hazards of human spaceflight, however, ground analogs of Mars missions can be used to ensure effective measures and experimental design before testing begins on the ISS. The strategic concepts refined as part of these workshops were brought to a multilateral forum, Mulitlateral Human Research Planel for Exploration (MHRPE), where ISS partner agencies are now discussing implementation plans to provide new opportunities to use the ISS to prepare for </span>deep space exploration over the coming decade. In this publication we present a summary of the international strategic plans for future research that will enable operations, software, and countermeasures to be developed that will reduce the risk to humans during future crewed missions to Mars.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37501,"journal":{"name":"REACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling innovative research on the International Space Station to solve the challenges of a human mission to Mars: Results of the ISS4Mars international workshops 2020–2021\",\"authors\":\"Michael Waid ,&nbsp;Livio Narici ,&nbsp;Michaela Girgenrath ,&nbsp;Katrin Stang ,&nbsp;Isabelle Marcil ,&nbsp;Perry Johnson-Green ,&nbsp;Thu Jennifer Ngo-Anh ,&nbsp;Oleg Kotov ,&nbsp;Keiji Murakami ,&nbsp;Robert Dempsey ,&nbsp;Jancy McPhee ,&nbsp;Kevin Sato ,&nbsp;Bette Siegel ,&nbsp;Sam Scimemi ,&nbsp;Julie Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reach.2022.100047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>During the ISS4Mars workshops in 2020–2021, personnel from the International Space Station (ISS) partner agencies convened to reflect on scenarios for how the ISS could be used and its operations possibly modified to simulate aspects of a human mission to Mars. Scientific leaders, operations experts, crewmembers, managers, and flight surgeons discussed the five hazards of human spaceflight—gravity transitions, radiation, isolation and confinement<span>, distance from Earth, and hostile closed environments—and considered how an ISS-based analog of Mars transit could benefit assessments and mitigations of these hazards. A focused writing team then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each approach identified by the workshop participants before developing a set of eight use cases to consider the feasibility of implementing on the ISS. The writing team also identified the prerequisites needed, including ground analog studies simulating a mission to Mars required to verify measurements and procedures, before testing could begin on the ISS. Five of the use cases were considered feasible to assess in simulations using an ISS-based analog of Mars transit if some ground rules and assumptions were met. These five use cases were Earth-independent medical operations, Earth-independent integrated operations, life support and food for a one year duration, lower-body negative pressure as a countermeasure against the effects of exposure to microgravity, and fitness levels after landing. In addition, three more extensive interventions—extended </span></span>Mars surface<span><span> operations, a small-volume transit analog, and artificial gravity—were deemed unfeasible for testing on the ISS. Experience gained from the five use cases executed on the ISS may help answer some of the questions in the deferred scenarios, or it may be possible to complete them on another platform (e.g. commercial space station, lunar habitat). Simulating conditions during a Mars mission on the ISS will afford higher fidelity for assessing multiple integrated hazards of human spaceflight, however, ground analogs of Mars missions can be used to ensure effective measures and experimental design before testing begins on the ISS. The strategic concepts refined as part of these workshops were brought to a multilateral forum, Mulitlateral Human Research Planel for Exploration (MHRPE), where ISS partner agencies are now discussing implementation plans to provide new opportunities to use the ISS to prepare for </span>deep space exploration over the coming decade. In this publication we present a summary of the international strategic plans for future research that will enable operations, software, and countermeasures to be developed that will reduce the risk to humans during future crewed missions to Mars.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REACH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REACH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309322000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309322000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2020-2021年的ISS4Mars研讨会期间,来自国际空间站(ISS)合作机构的人员聚集在一起,讨论了如何使用国际空间站及其操作可能进行的修改,以模拟人类火星任务的各个方面。科学领袖、操作专家、机组人员、管理人员和飞行外科医生讨论了人类太空飞行的五大危害——重力转换、辐射、隔离和限制、与地球的距离以及敌对的封闭环境——并考虑了基于国际空间站的火星过境模拟如何有助于评估和减轻这些危害。然后,一个专注的写作小组讨论了研讨会参与者确定的每种方法的优缺点,然后开发了一组八个用例,以考虑在国际空间站上实施的可行性。写作小组还确定了所需的先决条件,包括在国际空间站开始测试之前,模拟火星任务所需的地面模拟研究,以验证测量和程序。如果满足一些基本规则和假设,其中五个用例被认为是可行的,可以使用基于国际空间站的火星凌日模拟进行模拟评估。这五个用例是独立于地球的医疗行动、独立于地球的综合行动、为期一年的生命支持和食物、作为对抗微重力影响的对策的下半身负压,以及着陆后的健康水平。此外,三种更广泛的干预措施——扩展火星表面操作、小体积过境模拟和人工重力——被认为不适合在国际空间站上进行测试。从国际空间站上执行的五个用例中获得的经验可能有助于回答推迟方案中的一些问题,或者有可能在另一个平台上完成它们(例如商业空间站、月球栖息地)。国际空间站火星任务期间的模拟条件将为评估人类航天飞行的多种综合危害提供更高的保真度,然而,火星任务的地面模拟可以用于确保在国际空间站开始测试之前采取有效的措施和实验设计。作为这些研讨会的一部分,提炼的战略概念被带到多边论坛,即多边人类探索研究计划(MHRPE),国际空间站的伙伴机构现在正在讨论实施计划,以提供新的机会,利用国际空间站为未来十年的深空探索做准备。在本出版物中,我们概述了未来研究的国际战略计划,这些计划将使操作、软件和对策得以开发,从而降低未来载人火星任务对人类的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enabling innovative research on the International Space Station to solve the challenges of a human mission to Mars: Results of the ISS4Mars international workshops 2020–2021

During the ISS4Mars workshops in 2020–2021, personnel from the International Space Station (ISS) partner agencies convened to reflect on scenarios for how the ISS could be used and its operations possibly modified to simulate aspects of a human mission to Mars. Scientific leaders, operations experts, crewmembers, managers, and flight surgeons discussed the five hazards of human spaceflight—gravity transitions, radiation, isolation and confinement, distance from Earth, and hostile closed environments—and considered how an ISS-based analog of Mars transit could benefit assessments and mitigations of these hazards. A focused writing team then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each approach identified by the workshop participants before developing a set of eight use cases to consider the feasibility of implementing on the ISS. The writing team also identified the prerequisites needed, including ground analog studies simulating a mission to Mars required to verify measurements and procedures, before testing could begin on the ISS. Five of the use cases were considered feasible to assess in simulations using an ISS-based analog of Mars transit if some ground rules and assumptions were met. These five use cases were Earth-independent medical operations, Earth-independent integrated operations, life support and food for a one year duration, lower-body negative pressure as a countermeasure against the effects of exposure to microgravity, and fitness levels after landing. In addition, three more extensive interventions—extended Mars surface operations, a small-volume transit analog, and artificial gravity—were deemed unfeasible for testing on the ISS. Experience gained from the five use cases executed on the ISS may help answer some of the questions in the deferred scenarios, or it may be possible to complete them on another platform (e.g. commercial space station, lunar habitat). Simulating conditions during a Mars mission on the ISS will afford higher fidelity for assessing multiple integrated hazards of human spaceflight, however, ground analogs of Mars missions can be used to ensure effective measures and experimental design before testing begins on the ISS. The strategic concepts refined as part of these workshops were brought to a multilateral forum, Mulitlateral Human Research Planel for Exploration (MHRPE), where ISS partner agencies are now discussing implementation plans to provide new opportunities to use the ISS to prepare for deep space exploration over the coming decade. In this publication we present a summary of the international strategic plans for future research that will enable operations, software, and countermeasures to be developed that will reduce the risk to humans during future crewed missions to Mars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REACH
REACH Engineering-Aerospace Engineering
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The Official Human Space Exploration Review Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) REACH – Reviews in Human Space Exploration is an international review journal that covers the entire field of human space exploration, including: -Human Space Exploration Mission Scenarios -Robotic Space Exploration Missions (Preparing or Supporting Human Missions) -Commercial Human Spaceflight -Space Habitation and Environmental Health -Space Physiology, Psychology, Medicine and Environmental Health -Space Radiation and Radiation Biology -Exo- and Astrobiology -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) -Spin-off Applications from Human Spaceflight -Benefits from Space-Based Research for Health on Earth -Earth Observation for Agriculture, Climate Monitoring, Disaster Mitigation -Terrestrial Applications of Space Life Sciences Developments -Extreme Environments REACH aims to meet the needs of readers from academia, industry, and government by publishing comprehensive overviews of the science of human and robotic space exploration, life sciences research in space, and beneficial terrestrial applications that are derived from spaceflight. Special emphasis will be put on summarizing the most important recent developments and challenges in each of the covered fields, and on making published articles legible for a non-specialist audience. Authors can also submit non-solicited review articles. Please note that original research articles are not published in REACH. The Journal plans to publish four issues per year containing six to eight review articles each.
期刊最新文献
Mental health implications for aviators from COVID-19 Has Mars become the new space Race? And are we able to justify space Exploration? Enabling innovative research on the International Space Station to solve the challenges of a human mission to Mars: Results of the ISS4Mars international workshops 2020–2021 Commercial space tourism: An integrative review of spaceflight participant psychological assessment and training Menstrual management considerations in the space environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1