再生产与阶级斗争。阿尔都塞对新自由主义的解读

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Valenciana Pub Date : 2021-01-16 DOI:10.15174/RV.V13I27.580
Gisela Catanzaro, Natalia Romé
{"title":"再生产与阶级斗争。阿尔都塞对新自由主义的解读","authors":"Gisela Catanzaro, Natalia Romé","doi":"10.15174/RV.V13I27.580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a brief review of three important perspectives for a critical approach to so-called \"neo-liberalism”, the study identifies a common vacancy in its characterization as a post-hegemonic capitalism; as a specific rationality; or as an hegemonic articulation. Despite their differences, these analyses are based on the detection of a single feature of the neoliberal social formation - the logic of Capital; Power or political articulations – and find extremely difficult to conceptualize Its inscription in the overdetermined complexity of the historical totality. Based on this reading, a revision of the Theory of Social Reproduction formulated by Louis Althusser towards the end of the 1960s is proposed, focusing on the question of the complex of relationships, tendencies and tensions that confer its contradictory consistency and heterogeneous historicity to a social formation. This allows the intellection of long-lasting structural processes, but through the essential detours of the concrete aspects in which these tendencies exist and without which their economic determinations become abstract: on the one hand, the ideological situation, understood as the complex of devices, discursive formations, practices and interpellation forms that give concrete existence and at the same time modulate the duration/transformation of a given order of relations; on the other hand, the processes of political subjectivation of its contradictions, in its overdetermined contingency. This approach allows us to characterize neo-liberalism as a conjunctural process, unstable but determined, and –finally- to sketch out some general conjectures in order to understand in a complex way the concrete circumstances of the Argentinean neoliberal situation in recent years.","PeriodicalId":40683,"journal":{"name":"Valenciana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducción y lucha de clases. Bosquejo de una lectura althusseriana del neoliberalismo\",\"authors\":\"Gisela Catanzaro, Natalia Romé\",\"doi\":\"10.15174/RV.V13I27.580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a brief review of three important perspectives for a critical approach to so-called \\\"neo-liberalism”, the study identifies a common vacancy in its characterization as a post-hegemonic capitalism; as a specific rationality; or as an hegemonic articulation. Despite their differences, these analyses are based on the detection of a single feature of the neoliberal social formation - the logic of Capital; Power or political articulations – and find extremely difficult to conceptualize Its inscription in the overdetermined complexity of the historical totality. Based on this reading, a revision of the Theory of Social Reproduction formulated by Louis Althusser towards the end of the 1960s is proposed, focusing on the question of the complex of relationships, tendencies and tensions that confer its contradictory consistency and heterogeneous historicity to a social formation. This allows the intellection of long-lasting structural processes, but through the essential detours of the concrete aspects in which these tendencies exist and without which their economic determinations become abstract: on the one hand, the ideological situation, understood as the complex of devices, discursive formations, practices and interpellation forms that give concrete existence and at the same time modulate the duration/transformation of a given order of relations; on the other hand, the processes of political subjectivation of its contradictions, in its overdetermined contingency. This approach allows us to characterize neo-liberalism as a conjunctural process, unstable but determined, and –finally- to sketch out some general conjectures in order to understand in a complex way the concrete circumstances of the Argentinean neoliberal situation in recent years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Valenciana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Valenciana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15174/RV.V13I27.580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valenciana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15174/RV.V13I27.580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在简要回顾对所谓“新自由主义”进行批判的三个重要视角的基础上,本研究指出了其作为后霸权资本主义的特征的一个共同空缺;作为一种具体的理性;或者作为一种霸权的表达。尽管存在差异,但这些分析都是基于对新自由主义社会形态的单一特征的发现——《资本论》的逻辑;权力或政治表达——并且发现极其难以概念化它在历史总体的过度决定的复杂性中的铭文。在此基础上,对路易·阿尔都塞在20世纪60年代末提出的社会再生产理论进行了修订,重点关注关系、趋势和紧张的复杂性问题,这些关系、趋势和紧张关系赋予了社会形态的矛盾一致性和异质性历史性。这允许思考持久的结构过程,但通过具体方面的基本弯路,这些趋势存在,没有它们,它们的经济决定变得抽象:一方面,意识形态的情况,被理解为复杂的设备,话语形成,实践和提问形式,赋予具体的存在,同时调节持续时间/转换给定的关系秩序;另一方面,其矛盾的政治主体化过程,在其过度决定的偶然性。这种方法使我们能够将新自由主义描述为一个不稳定但坚定的联合过程,并最终勾勒出一些一般性的猜测,以便以复杂的方式理解近年来阿根廷新自由主义形势的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproducción y lucha de clases. Bosquejo de una lectura althusseriana del neoliberalismo
Based on a brief review of three important perspectives for a critical approach to so-called "neo-liberalism”, the study identifies a common vacancy in its characterization as a post-hegemonic capitalism; as a specific rationality; or as an hegemonic articulation. Despite their differences, these analyses are based on the detection of a single feature of the neoliberal social formation - the logic of Capital; Power or political articulations – and find extremely difficult to conceptualize Its inscription in the overdetermined complexity of the historical totality. Based on this reading, a revision of the Theory of Social Reproduction formulated by Louis Althusser towards the end of the 1960s is proposed, focusing on the question of the complex of relationships, tendencies and tensions that confer its contradictory consistency and heterogeneous historicity to a social formation. This allows the intellection of long-lasting structural processes, but through the essential detours of the concrete aspects in which these tendencies exist and without which their economic determinations become abstract: on the one hand, the ideological situation, understood as the complex of devices, discursive formations, practices and interpellation forms that give concrete existence and at the same time modulate the duration/transformation of a given order of relations; on the other hand, the processes of political subjectivation of its contradictions, in its overdetermined contingency. This approach allows us to characterize neo-liberalism as a conjunctural process, unstable but determined, and –finally- to sketch out some general conjectures in order to understand in a complex way the concrete circumstances of the Argentinean neoliberal situation in recent years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Valenciana
Valenciana LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Humanismo Crítico como investigación social crítica José Vasconcelos. Ideario de acción: Discursos, artículos, cartas, documentos 1920-1924 giro audiovisual? Biopolítica Texto, silencio y performance sonoro. La poética en tránsito de Verónica Gerber Bicecci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1