澳大利亚长期护理人员对晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗的知识和态度

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-11-10 DOI:10.1177/1471301219886768
T. Luckett, G. Luscombe, J. Phillips, E. Beattie, L. Chenoweth, P. Davidson, S. Goodall, D. Pond, G. Mitchell, M. Agar
{"title":"澳大利亚长期护理人员对晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗的知识和态度","authors":"T. Luckett, G. Luscombe, J. Phillips, E. Beattie, L. Chenoweth, P. Davidson, S. Goodall, D. Pond, G. Mitchell, M. Agar","doi":"10.1177/1471301219886768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to describe Australian long-term care (LTC) personnel’s knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for residents with advanced dementia, and explore relationships with LTC facility/personnel characteristics. An analysis was undertaken of baseline data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of facilitated family case conferencing for improving palliative care of LTC residents with advanced dementia (the ‘IDEAL Study’). Participants included any LTC personnel directly involved in residents’ care. Knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for people with advanced dementia were measured using the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored relationships between personnel knowledge/attitudes and facility/personnel characteristics. Of 307 personnel in the IDEAL Study, 290 (94.5%) from 19/20 LTCFs provided sufficient data for inclusion. Participants included 9 (2.8%) nurse managers, 59 (20.5%) registered nurses, 25 (8.7%) enrolled nurses, 187 (64.9%) assistants in nursing/personal care assistants and 9 (3.1%) care service employees. In multivariate analyses, a facility policy not to rotate personnel through dementia units was the only variable associated with more favourable overall personnel knowledge and attitudes. Other variables associated with favourable knowledge were a designation of nursing manager or registered or enrolled nurse, and having a preferred language of English. Other variables associated with favourable attitudes were tertiary level of education and greater experience in dementia care. Like previous international research, this study found Australian LTC personnel knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia to be associated with both facility and personnel characteristics. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand the relationships between knowledge and attitudes, as well as between these attributes and quality of care.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"427 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219886768","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian long-term care personnel’s knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia\",\"authors\":\"T. Luckett, G. Luscombe, J. Phillips, E. Beattie, L. Chenoweth, P. Davidson, S. Goodall, D. Pond, G. Mitchell, M. Agar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1471301219886768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to describe Australian long-term care (LTC) personnel’s knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for residents with advanced dementia, and explore relationships with LTC facility/personnel characteristics. An analysis was undertaken of baseline data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of facilitated family case conferencing for improving palliative care of LTC residents with advanced dementia (the ‘IDEAL Study’). Participants included any LTC personnel directly involved in residents’ care. Knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for people with advanced dementia were measured using the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored relationships between personnel knowledge/attitudes and facility/personnel characteristics. Of 307 personnel in the IDEAL Study, 290 (94.5%) from 19/20 LTCFs provided sufficient data for inclusion. Participants included 9 (2.8%) nurse managers, 59 (20.5%) registered nurses, 25 (8.7%) enrolled nurses, 187 (64.9%) assistants in nursing/personal care assistants and 9 (3.1%) care service employees. In multivariate analyses, a facility policy not to rotate personnel through dementia units was the only variable associated with more favourable overall personnel knowledge and attitudes. Other variables associated with favourable knowledge were a designation of nursing manager or registered or enrolled nurse, and having a preferred language of English. Other variables associated with favourable attitudes were tertiary level of education and greater experience in dementia care. Like previous international research, this study found Australian LTC personnel knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia to be associated with both facility and personnel characteristics. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand the relationships between knowledge and attitudes, as well as between these attributes and quality of care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219886768\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219886768\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219886768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究旨在描述澳洲长期照护(LTC)人员对晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗的知识和态度,并探讨与LTC设施/人员特征的关系。对促进家庭病例会议以改善晚期痴呆LTC患者姑息治疗的聚类随机对照试验(“IDEAL研究”)的基线数据进行了分析。参与者包括任何直接参与居民护理的LTC人员。采用《晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗问卷》对晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗的知识和态度进行测量。单变量和多变量分析探讨了人员知识/态度与设施/人员特征之间的关系。在IDEAL研究的307名人员中,来自19/20个ltcf的290名(94.5%)提供了足够的数据纳入。研究对象包括护理经理9名(2.8%)、注册护士59名(20.5%)、注册护士25名(8.7%)、护理助理/个人护理助理187名(64.9%)和护理服务人员9名(3.1%)。在多变量分析中,不通过痴呆症病房轮换人员的设施政策是与更有利的总体人员知识和态度相关的唯一变量。其他与有利知识相关的变量是指定的护理经理或注册或注册护士,以及首选的语言是英语。与积极态度相关的其他变量是高等教育程度和更多的痴呆症护理经验。与以往的国际研究一样,本研究发现澳大利亚LTC人员对晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗的知识和态度与设施和人员特征有关。未来的纵向研究需要更好地理解知识和态度之间的关系,以及这些属性和护理质量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Australian long-term care personnel’s knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia
This study aimed to describe Australian long-term care (LTC) personnel’s knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for residents with advanced dementia, and explore relationships with LTC facility/personnel characteristics. An analysis was undertaken of baseline data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of facilitated family case conferencing for improving palliative care of LTC residents with advanced dementia (the ‘IDEAL Study’). Participants included any LTC personnel directly involved in residents’ care. Knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for people with advanced dementia were measured using the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored relationships between personnel knowledge/attitudes and facility/personnel characteristics. Of 307 personnel in the IDEAL Study, 290 (94.5%) from 19/20 LTCFs provided sufficient data for inclusion. Participants included 9 (2.8%) nurse managers, 59 (20.5%) registered nurses, 25 (8.7%) enrolled nurses, 187 (64.9%) assistants in nursing/personal care assistants and 9 (3.1%) care service employees. In multivariate analyses, a facility policy not to rotate personnel through dementia units was the only variable associated with more favourable overall personnel knowledge and attitudes. Other variables associated with favourable knowledge were a designation of nursing manager or registered or enrolled nurse, and having a preferred language of English. Other variables associated with favourable attitudes were tertiary level of education and greater experience in dementia care. Like previous international research, this study found Australian LTC personnel knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia to be associated with both facility and personnel characteristics. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand the relationships between knowledge and attitudes, as well as between these attributes and quality of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms in Emotional Information Processing in Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder: An Event-Related Potential Study of an Information Processing Model. Book Reviews: Diary of the Fall Doing relationship-centered dementia care: Learning from each other for better dementia support Book Review: Dementia Caregiving East and West: Issues of Communication Book Review: Book Reviews Williams 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1