{"title":"档案中的苹果树:梭罗、弥尔顿与美国历史的忧郁","authors":"G. Osborne","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2017.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In book 10 of Milton’s Paradise Lost, Satan, recently returned to hell after his exploits in Eden, brags to his infernal cronies that his seduction of Adam and Eve was wondrously simple. He has lured them away from God with only an “apple” (PL 10.485–87). But Satan’s claims for the simplicity of the fruit of the tree of knowledge are reductive. In fact, the fruit is only an apple according to Satan; no other speaker in Paradise Lost names it so.1 Elsewhere, Milton makes the fruit intentionally ambiguous — as “Ruddie and Gold” as an apple at one moment, as “downie” and “ambrosial” as a peach at another — but never finally classified one way or the other (PL 9.578, 851–52).2 In keeping the fruit of the Fall generic, Milton keeps its effects implicitly tied to both Nature’s general fecundity and Eve’s “fruitful Womb,” reminding readers of the full span of biblical history, from God’s predetermination of “each / Plant” and “every Herb” even “before it grew” in Genesis, through the possibility of humankind’s redemption through Eve’s descendants — Christ, and his followers (PL 5.388–90, 7.334–36). When Satan introduces the “goodly” tree’s “apples” to Eve as “fair,” he seeks to","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"67 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2017.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apple Trees in the Archive: Thoreau, Milton, and the Melancholy of American History\",\"authors\":\"G. Osborne\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/MLT.2017.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In book 10 of Milton’s Paradise Lost, Satan, recently returned to hell after his exploits in Eden, brags to his infernal cronies that his seduction of Adam and Eve was wondrously simple. He has lured them away from God with only an “apple” (PL 10.485–87). But Satan’s claims for the simplicity of the fruit of the tree of knowledge are reductive. In fact, the fruit is only an apple according to Satan; no other speaker in Paradise Lost names it so.1 Elsewhere, Milton makes the fruit intentionally ambiguous — as “Ruddie and Gold” as an apple at one moment, as “downie” and “ambrosial” as a peach at another — but never finally classified one way or the other (PL 9.578, 851–52).2 In keeping the fruit of the Fall generic, Milton keeps its effects implicitly tied to both Nature’s general fecundity and Eve’s “fruitful Womb,” reminding readers of the full span of biblical history, from God’s predetermination of “each / Plant” and “every Herb” even “before it grew” in Genesis, through the possibility of humankind’s redemption through Eve’s descendants — Christ, and his followers (PL 5.388–90, 7.334–36). When Satan introduces the “goodly” tree’s “apples” to Eve as “fair,” he seeks to\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"67 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2017.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2017.0004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2017.0004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在米尔顿的《失乐园》第10本书中,撒旦在伊甸园的事迹结束后,最近回到了地狱,他向地狱般的密友吹嘘说,他对亚当和夏娃的诱惑非常简单。他仅仅用一个“苹果”就引诱他们离开了上帝(PL 10.485-87)。但撒旦对知识之树果实的简单性的主张是还原性的。事实上,根据撒旦的说法,这种水果只是一个苹果;在《失乐园》中,没有其他演讲者这样称呼它。1在其他地方,米尔顿故意让这种水果模棱两可——一会儿是苹果的“Ruddie and Gold”,一会儿是桃子的“downie”和“ambrosial”——但从未最终以这样或那样的方式分类(PL 9.57851-52)。2为了保持秋天的水果的通用性,米尔顿将其影响隐含地与大自然的普遍多产和夏娃的“多产的女人”联系在一起,提醒读者圣经历史的全貌,从《创世纪》中上帝对“每一株植物”和“每一种草本植物”的预先定义,甚至“在它生长之前”,到夏娃的后代——基督,以及他的追随者(PL 5.388–90,7.334–36)。当撒旦向夏娃介绍“善良”树的“苹果”是“公平的”时,他试图
Apple Trees in the Archive: Thoreau, Milton, and the Melancholy of American History
In book 10 of Milton’s Paradise Lost, Satan, recently returned to hell after his exploits in Eden, brags to his infernal cronies that his seduction of Adam and Eve was wondrously simple. He has lured them away from God with only an “apple” (PL 10.485–87). But Satan’s claims for the simplicity of the fruit of the tree of knowledge are reductive. In fact, the fruit is only an apple according to Satan; no other speaker in Paradise Lost names it so.1 Elsewhere, Milton makes the fruit intentionally ambiguous — as “Ruddie and Gold” as an apple at one moment, as “downie” and “ambrosial” as a peach at another — but never finally classified one way or the other (PL 9.578, 851–52).2 In keeping the fruit of the Fall generic, Milton keeps its effects implicitly tied to both Nature’s general fecundity and Eve’s “fruitful Womb,” reminding readers of the full span of biblical history, from God’s predetermination of “each / Plant” and “every Herb” even “before it grew” in Genesis, through the possibility of humankind’s redemption through Eve’s descendants — Christ, and his followers (PL 5.388–90, 7.334–36). When Satan introduces the “goodly” tree’s “apples” to Eve as “fair,” he seeks to