两种教师培训对学生焦虑的比较

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL School Psychology International Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1177/01430343231180299
Golda S. Ginsburg, Jeffrey E. Pella, A. DeVito, Grace Sze York Chan
{"title":"两种教师培训对学生焦虑的比较","authors":"Golda S. Ginsburg, Jeffrey E. Pella, A. DeVito, Grace Sze York Chan","doi":"10.1177/01430343231180299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of two teacher trainings, both focused on identifying student anxiety and implementing empirically supported anxiety reduction strategies in the classroom. A comparison of teachers’ satisfaction with their training was examined along with pre–post training changes on measures of teachers’ knowledge and use of evidence-based anxiety reduction strategies, perceived confidence in assisting students with anxiety, and teaching self-efficacy. Volunteer elementary teachers in New England USA were randomized to receive either a six-hour interactive training (Teacher Anxiety Program for Elementary Students; TAPES; n  =  41) or a three-hour didactic (Teacher Anxiety Training; TAT; n  =  37). Fifty-four teachers completed their respective training (mean age 40.9; SD  =  10.2; 98% female; 96% White). Results from t-tests indicated that levels of training satisfaction were high and similar across trainings. Mixed-design ANOVA analyses found that teachers receiving both trainings showed significant improvements in teacher knowledge and use of anxiety reduction strategies, confidence, and self-efficacy. Teachers receiving TAPES, compared to TAT, showed greater improvements in their knowledge of anxiety reduction strategies. Findings highlight the need and perceived value of training teachers on topics related to identifying and managing student anxiety.","PeriodicalId":47723,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two teacher trainings on student anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Golda S. Ginsburg, Jeffrey E. Pella, A. DeVito, Grace Sze York Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01430343231180299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of two teacher trainings, both focused on identifying student anxiety and implementing empirically supported anxiety reduction strategies in the classroom. A comparison of teachers’ satisfaction with their training was examined along with pre–post training changes on measures of teachers’ knowledge and use of evidence-based anxiety reduction strategies, perceived confidence in assisting students with anxiety, and teaching self-efficacy. Volunteer elementary teachers in New England USA were randomized to receive either a six-hour interactive training (Teacher Anxiety Program for Elementary Students; TAPES; n  =  41) or a three-hour didactic (Teacher Anxiety Training; TAT; n  =  37). Fifty-four teachers completed their respective training (mean age 40.9; SD  =  10.2; 98% female; 96% White). Results from t-tests indicated that levels of training satisfaction were high and similar across trainings. Mixed-design ANOVA analyses found that teachers receiving both trainings showed significant improvements in teacher knowledge and use of anxiety reduction strategies, confidence, and self-efficacy. Teachers receiving TAPES, compared to TAT, showed greater improvements in their knowledge of anxiety reduction strategies. Findings highlight the need and perceived value of training teachers on topics related to identifying and managing student anxiety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231180299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology International","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231180299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种教师培训的影响,这两种培训都侧重于识别学生的焦虑,并在课堂上实施经验支持的减少焦虑策略。比较了教师对培训的满意度,以及培训前后教师知识和循证焦虑减轻策略使用情况、帮助学生应对焦虑的感知信心和教学自我效能感的变化。美国新英格兰的义务小学教师被随机分配接受六小时的互动培训(小学生教师焦虑计划;TAPES  =  41)或三小时的教学(教师焦虑训练;TAT;n  =  37)。54名教师完成了各自的培训(平均年龄40.9岁;SD  =  10.2;98%为女性;96%白色)。t检验的结果表明,培训满意度很高,并且在不同的培训中相似。混合设计方差分析发现,接受这两种培训的教师在教师知识和减少焦虑策略的使用、信心和自我效能方面都有显著改善。与TAT相比,接受TAPES的教师在减少焦虑策略的知识方面有了更大的进步。研究结果强调了对教师进行识别和管理学生焦虑相关主题培训的必要性和感知价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of two teacher trainings on student anxiety
The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of two teacher trainings, both focused on identifying student anxiety and implementing empirically supported anxiety reduction strategies in the classroom. A comparison of teachers’ satisfaction with their training was examined along with pre–post training changes on measures of teachers’ knowledge and use of evidence-based anxiety reduction strategies, perceived confidence in assisting students with anxiety, and teaching self-efficacy. Volunteer elementary teachers in New England USA were randomized to receive either a six-hour interactive training (Teacher Anxiety Program for Elementary Students; TAPES; n  =  41) or a three-hour didactic (Teacher Anxiety Training; TAT; n  =  37). Fifty-four teachers completed their respective training (mean age 40.9; SD  =  10.2; 98% female; 96% White). Results from t-tests indicated that levels of training satisfaction were high and similar across trainings. Mixed-design ANOVA analyses found that teachers receiving both trainings showed significant improvements in teacher knowledge and use of anxiety reduction strategies, confidence, and self-efficacy. Teachers receiving TAPES, compared to TAT, showed greater improvements in their knowledge of anxiety reduction strategies. Findings highlight the need and perceived value of training teachers on topics related to identifying and managing student anxiety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology International
School Psychology International PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The official publication of the ISPA. School Psychology International highlights the concerns of those who provide quality mental health, educational, therapeutic and support services to schools and their communities throughout the world. The Journal publishes a wide range of original empirical research, cross-cultural replications of promising procedures and descriptions of technology transfer
期刊最新文献
“It takes a village”: An ecological analysis of social and emotional learning environments in Malawi Provision of educational psychological services under a high inflationary environment in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe The role of teachers’ social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology School psychologists’ training to support inclusive education in Portugal: Trainers’ perspectives of opportunities, challenges, and improvements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1