{"title":"多动症因子结构中的双因子模型与混合因子模型。","authors":"J. F. D. Miguel","doi":"10.1344/anpsic2019.49.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, the bifactor model of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been widely investigated. This model consists of a general dimension of ADHD and two specific factors (inattention and hyperactivity / impulsivity). On the other hand, mixed factor models (FMM) have also begun to be implemented in the study of the structure of ADHD due to the possibility of combining categorical and continuous variables that facilitate the study of the latent reality of the disorder. The aim of the present work was to describe and analyse the research published in the last ten years (from 2008 to 2018) that were based on bifactor models and mixed factor models (FMM) for the analysis of the structure of ADHD. Given that, to date, there is no consistent evidence on an optimal model of the disorder in children and adolescents. For this, an exhaustive review based on a bibliographic search was presented, where the publications of scientific journals referring to the objective of the work were analysed. The studies conclude that the bifactor is superior to the traditional model of two correlated factors, according to the adjustment obtained by factor analysis, while the mixed factorial model of ADHD of two factors and two classes has shown a better adjustment than most of the bifactor models.","PeriodicalId":44066,"journal":{"name":"Anuario de Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los Modelos Bifactor vs. los Modelos Factoriales Mixtos en la estructura factorial del TDAH.\",\"authors\":\"J. F. D. Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/anpsic2019.49.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, the bifactor model of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been widely investigated. This model consists of a general dimension of ADHD and two specific factors (inattention and hyperactivity / impulsivity). On the other hand, mixed factor models (FMM) have also begun to be implemented in the study of the structure of ADHD due to the possibility of combining categorical and continuous variables that facilitate the study of the latent reality of the disorder. The aim of the present work was to describe and analyse the research published in the last ten years (from 2008 to 2018) that were based on bifactor models and mixed factor models (FMM) for the analysis of the structure of ADHD. Given that, to date, there is no consistent evidence on an optimal model of the disorder in children and adolescents. For this, an exhaustive review based on a bibliographic search was presented, where the publications of scientific journals referring to the objective of the work were analysed. The studies conclude that the bifactor is superior to the traditional model of two correlated factors, according to the adjustment obtained by factor analysis, while the mixed factorial model of ADHD of two factors and two classes has shown a better adjustment than most of the bifactor models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario de Psicologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario de Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/anpsic2019.49.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/anpsic2019.49.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Los Modelos Bifactor vs. los Modelos Factoriales Mixtos en la estructura factorial del TDAH.
In the last decade, the bifactor model of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been widely investigated. This model consists of a general dimension of ADHD and two specific factors (inattention and hyperactivity / impulsivity). On the other hand, mixed factor models (FMM) have also begun to be implemented in the study of the structure of ADHD due to the possibility of combining categorical and continuous variables that facilitate the study of the latent reality of the disorder. The aim of the present work was to describe and analyse the research published in the last ten years (from 2008 to 2018) that were based on bifactor models and mixed factor models (FMM) for the analysis of the structure of ADHD. Given that, to date, there is no consistent evidence on an optimal model of the disorder in children and adolescents. For this, an exhaustive review based on a bibliographic search was presented, where the publications of scientific journals referring to the objective of the work were analysed. The studies conclude that the bifactor is superior to the traditional model of two correlated factors, according to the adjustment obtained by factor analysis, while the mixed factorial model of ADHD of two factors and two classes has shown a better adjustment than most of the bifactor models.
期刊介绍:
The Anuario de Psicología, one of Spain"s most important general psychology journals, is published by the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Barcelona. It appears three times a year. The Anuario combines continuity with the past with a strong commitment to the present and the future. The journal is broad-ranging, interdisciplinary, and innovative. The Anuario publishes research reports and applied studies in all fields of psychology. We also accept theorical, epistemological studies, organize dossiers on topical themes, and hold debates on controversial subjects deriving from a central article.