{"title":"规范社交媒体平台:比较政策分析","authors":"Alex Rochefort","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-profile scandals related to electoral interference, fake news and misinformation, violations of data privacy, and suppression of political activism by anti-democratic regimes have cast a cloud over the social media industry in recent years. The question is not if, but when and how, reform will be undertaken and with what consequences. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of competing alternatives for social media platform regulation. Its focus is international, encompassing not only proposals advanced by different groups within the United States, but also selected major developments abroad. The goal of such a comparison is to improve understanding of limited as well as more comprehensive strategies of intervention while evaluating their appeal for addressing the controversy that surrounds the social media industry based on policy effectiveness and other technical and normative criteria.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"225 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alex Rochefort\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High-profile scandals related to electoral interference, fake news and misinformation, violations of data privacy, and suppression of political activism by anti-democratic regimes have cast a cloud over the social media industry in recent years. The question is not if, but when and how, reform will be undertaken and with what consequences. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of competing alternatives for social media platform regulation. Its focus is international, encompassing not only proposals advanced by different groups within the United States, but also selected major developments abroad. The goal of such a comparison is to improve understanding of limited as well as more comprehensive strategies of intervention while evaluating their appeal for addressing the controversy that surrounds the social media industry based on policy effectiveness and other technical and normative criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis
High-profile scandals related to electoral interference, fake news and misinformation, violations of data privacy, and suppression of political activism by anti-democratic regimes have cast a cloud over the social media industry in recent years. The question is not if, but when and how, reform will be undertaken and with what consequences. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of competing alternatives for social media platform regulation. Its focus is international, encompassing not only proposals advanced by different groups within the United States, but also selected major developments abroad. The goal of such a comparison is to improve understanding of limited as well as more comprehensive strategies of intervention while evaluating their appeal for addressing the controversy that surrounds the social media industry based on policy effectiveness and other technical and normative criteria.
期刊介绍:
The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.