{"title":"论战性的赛义德·乌斯曼·贝塔维和SYCH AHMAD QUATTIB MINANG与JUMAT有关的原则","authors":"A. Ilyas","doi":"10.30821/jcims.v2i2.3194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas polemik antara Sayyid Usman Betawi dan Syekh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau tentang pelaksanaan salat Jumat di dua masjid di Palembang. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian kepustakaan dengan memanfaatkan metode analisis isi. Kajian ini dimulai dari pengungkapan biografi kedua ulama dan polemik kedua ulama dalam bidang fikih, khususnya tentang salat Jumat. Perdebatan ini memang menyita perhatian Sayyid Usman yang menulis sepuluh karya tentang objek yang diperdebatkan. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa tradisi kritik tidak saja berlaku pada ulama di era klasik, tetapi juga ulama Nusantara di era Kolonial. Perdebatan di antara dua ulama dalam satu persoalan terjadi pada satu masa tetapi berbeda tempat. Studi ini berkontribusi bagi pengkajian hukum Islam di era kolonial Belanda, sekaligus telah membuktikan bahwa ulama-ulama Nusantara berkontribusi dalam pengkajian hukum Islam di Nusantara.Abstract: Polemic of Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about Friday Prayer. This study discusses the polemic between Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about carrying out Friday prayers in two mosques in Palembang. This article is the result of library research using the content analysis method. This study begins with the disclosure of the biographies of the two ulemas and polemics of the two scholars in the field of jurisprudence, especially regarding Friday prayers. This debate indeed caught the attention of Sayyid Usman, who wrote ten works on the debated objects. This study shows that the tradition of criticism not only applies to the ulama in the classical era, but also the scholars of the Archipelago in the Colonial era. The debate between the two scholars in one problem occurred at one time but at a different place. This study contributes to the study of Islamic law in the Dutch colonial era, while also proving that the archipelago’s scholars contributed to the study of Islamic law in the archipelago region.Kata Kunci: fikih, ulama, naskah, Haramain, Nusantara","PeriodicalId":52954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLEMIK SAYYID USMAN BETAWI DAN SYEKH AHMAD KHATIB MINANGKABAU TENTANG SALAT JUMAT\",\"authors\":\"A. Ilyas\",\"doi\":\"10.30821/jcims.v2i2.3194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas polemik antara Sayyid Usman Betawi dan Syekh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau tentang pelaksanaan salat Jumat di dua masjid di Palembang. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian kepustakaan dengan memanfaatkan metode analisis isi. Kajian ini dimulai dari pengungkapan biografi kedua ulama dan polemik kedua ulama dalam bidang fikih, khususnya tentang salat Jumat. Perdebatan ini memang menyita perhatian Sayyid Usman yang menulis sepuluh karya tentang objek yang diperdebatkan. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa tradisi kritik tidak saja berlaku pada ulama di era klasik, tetapi juga ulama Nusantara di era Kolonial. Perdebatan di antara dua ulama dalam satu persoalan terjadi pada satu masa tetapi berbeda tempat. Studi ini berkontribusi bagi pengkajian hukum Islam di era kolonial Belanda, sekaligus telah membuktikan bahwa ulama-ulama Nusantara berkontribusi dalam pengkajian hukum Islam di Nusantara.Abstract: Polemic of Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about Friday Prayer. This study discusses the polemic between Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about carrying out Friday prayers in two mosques in Palembang. This article is the result of library research using the content analysis method. This study begins with the disclosure of the biographies of the two ulemas and polemics of the two scholars in the field of jurisprudence, especially regarding Friday prayers. This debate indeed caught the attention of Sayyid Usman, who wrote ten works on the debated objects. This study shows that the tradition of criticism not only applies to the ulama in the classical era, but also the scholars of the Archipelago in the Colonial era. The debate between the two scholars in one problem occurred at one time but at a different place. This study contributes to the study of Islamic law in the Dutch colonial era, while also proving that the archipelago’s scholars contributed to the study of Islamic law in the archipelago region.Kata Kunci: fikih, ulama, naskah, Haramain, Nusantara\",\"PeriodicalId\":52954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v2i2.3194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v2i2.3194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
摘要:本研究讨论了Sayyid Usman Betawi和Sheek Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau关于在巴望两座清真寺进行周五祈祷的争议。本文是运用内容分析法对图书馆进行研究的结果。本研究从二级传记和二级论战在小说中的表现入手,尤其是关于周五沙拉的表现。这场争论确实引起了赛义德·乌斯曼的注意,他写了十部关于这个物体的作品。这项研究表明,批判传统不仅发生在古典时代的学者身上,也发生在殖民时代的努桑塔拉。两位学者就一个问题进行的辩论发生在同一时间,但地点不同。这项研究为荷兰殖民时代的伊斯兰法研究做出了贡献,同时也证明了努桑塔拉学者对努桑塔拉伊斯兰法研究的贡献。本研究讨论了Sayyid Usman Betawi和Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau之间关于在巨港两座清真寺进行周五祈祷的争论。本文是运用内容分析法对图书馆进行研究的结果。本研究首先披露了两位乌里马的传记和两位法学界学者的论战,尤其是关于周五祈祷的论战。这场辩论确实引起了赛义德·乌斯曼的注意,他写了十部关于辩论对象的作品。本研究表明,批评传统不仅适用于古典时代的乌拉马人,也适用于殖民时代的群岛学者。两位学者在一个问题上的争论发生在同一时间,但发生在不同的地方。这项研究有助于荷兰殖民时代的伊斯兰法研究,同时也证明了群岛学者对群岛地区伊斯兰法研究的贡献。关键词:fikih,ulama,naskah,Haramain,Nusantara
POLEMIK SAYYID USMAN BETAWI DAN SYEKH AHMAD KHATIB MINANGKABAU TENTANG SALAT JUMAT
Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas polemik antara Sayyid Usman Betawi dan Syekh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau tentang pelaksanaan salat Jumat di dua masjid di Palembang. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian kepustakaan dengan memanfaatkan metode analisis isi. Kajian ini dimulai dari pengungkapan biografi kedua ulama dan polemik kedua ulama dalam bidang fikih, khususnya tentang salat Jumat. Perdebatan ini memang menyita perhatian Sayyid Usman yang menulis sepuluh karya tentang objek yang diperdebatkan. Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa tradisi kritik tidak saja berlaku pada ulama di era klasik, tetapi juga ulama Nusantara di era Kolonial. Perdebatan di antara dua ulama dalam satu persoalan terjadi pada satu masa tetapi berbeda tempat. Studi ini berkontribusi bagi pengkajian hukum Islam di era kolonial Belanda, sekaligus telah membuktikan bahwa ulama-ulama Nusantara berkontribusi dalam pengkajian hukum Islam di Nusantara.Abstract: Polemic of Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about Friday Prayer. This study discusses the polemic between Sayyid Usman Betawi and Shaykh Ahmad Khatib Minangkabau about carrying out Friday prayers in two mosques in Palembang. This article is the result of library research using the content analysis method. This study begins with the disclosure of the biographies of the two ulemas and polemics of the two scholars in the field of jurisprudence, especially regarding Friday prayers. This debate indeed caught the attention of Sayyid Usman, who wrote ten works on the debated objects. This study shows that the tradition of criticism not only applies to the ulama in the classical era, but also the scholars of the Archipelago in the Colonial era. The debate between the two scholars in one problem occurred at one time but at a different place. This study contributes to the study of Islamic law in the Dutch colonial era, while also proving that the archipelago’s scholars contributed to the study of Islamic law in the archipelago region.Kata Kunci: fikih, ulama, naskah, Haramain, Nusantara