分析非参数空间动态生产框架中的效率低下:一个k近邻建议

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1111/1477-9552.12522
Ioannis Skevas, Alfons Oude Lansink, Theodoros Skevas
{"title":"分析非参数空间动态生产框架中的效率低下:一个k近邻建议","authors":"Ioannis Skevas,&nbsp;Alfons Oude Lansink,&nbsp;Theodoros Skevas","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper accounts for spatial effects by benchmarking farms against their <i>k</i>-nearest neighbours (KNN) and measuring their inefficiency in a non-parametric dynamic by-production setting. The optimal number of neighbours <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> against which farms are compared corresponds to the value of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> that maximises the Moran I test for spatial autocorrelation of the good and the bad output of the farms' two sub-technologies. The inefficiency scores for farms' good output, variable inputs, investments and bad outputs are then computed and compared with those calculated based on a global technology, which benchmarks all farms together. The application focuses on an unbalanced panel of specialised Dutch dairy farms over the period 2009–2016 that contains information on their exact geographical locations. The results suggest that the inefficiency scores exhibit statistically significant differences between the KNN and the global model. Specifically, the inefficiencies are generally deflated when a KNN technology is considered, suggesting that ignoring spatial effects can overestimate inefficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 2","pages":"591-607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12522","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing inefficiency in a non-parametric spatial-dynamic by-production framework: A k-nearest neighbour proposal\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Skevas,&nbsp;Alfons Oude Lansink,&nbsp;Theodoros Skevas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-9552.12522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper accounts for spatial effects by benchmarking farms against their <i>k</i>-nearest neighbours (KNN) and measuring their inefficiency in a non-parametric dynamic by-production setting. The optimal number of neighbours <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> against which farms are compared corresponds to the value of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> that maximises the Moran I test for spatial autocorrelation of the good and the bad output of the farms' two sub-technologies. The inefficiency scores for farms' good output, variable inputs, investments and bad outputs are then computed and compared with those calculated based on a global technology, which benchmarks all farms together. The application focuses on an unbalanced panel of specialised Dutch dairy farms over the period 2009–2016 that contains information on their exact geographical locations. The results suggest that the inefficiency scores exhibit statistically significant differences between the KNN and the global model. Specifically, the inefficiencies are generally deflated when a KNN technology is considered, suggesting that ignoring spatial effects can overestimate inefficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"74 2\",\"pages\":\"591-607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12522\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12522\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过对农场的k近邻(KNN)进行基准测试,并在非参数动态副生产设置中测量它们的低效率,来解释空间效应。与农场进行比较的邻居k $$ k $$的最佳数量对应于k $$ k $$的值,该值最大化了农场两个子技术的好和坏产出的Moran I测试的空间自相关性。然后计算农场的良好产出、可变投入、投资和不良产出的低效率得分,并与基于全球技术的计算结果进行比较,该技术将所有农场放在一起作为基准。该应用程序侧重于2009年至2016年期间荷兰专业奶牛场的不平衡面板,其中包含有关其确切地理位置的信息。结果表明,低效率得分在KNN和全局模型之间表现出统计学上的显著差异。具体来说,当考虑到KNN技术时,低效率通常会降低,这表明忽略空间效应可能会高估低效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing inefficiency in a non-parametric spatial-dynamic by-production framework: A k-nearest neighbour proposal

This paper accounts for spatial effects by benchmarking farms against their k-nearest neighbours (KNN) and measuring their inefficiency in a non-parametric dynamic by-production setting. The optimal number of neighbours k $$ k $$ against which farms are compared corresponds to the value of k $$ k $$ that maximises the Moran I test for spatial autocorrelation of the good and the bad output of the farms' two sub-technologies. The inefficiency scores for farms' good output, variable inputs, investments and bad outputs are then computed and compared with those calculated based on a global technology, which benchmarks all farms together. The application focuses on an unbalanced panel of specialised Dutch dairy farms over the period 2009–2016 that contains information on their exact geographical locations. The results suggest that the inefficiency scores exhibit statistically significant differences between the KNN and the global model. Specifically, the inefficiencies are generally deflated when a KNN technology is considered, suggesting that ignoring spatial effects can overestimate inefficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
期刊最新文献
Technical and environmental inefficiency measurement in agriculture using a flexible by‐production stochastic frontier model The economic potential for area‐yield crop insurance: An application to maize in Ghana Commercialisation, exogenous shocks and nutrition: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Bangladesh Adoption of agronomic practices and their impact on crop yield and income: An analysis for black gram and green gram in India From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1