高等教育评估改革面临的挑战:一个遥远的视角

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH RELIEVE-Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088
D. Boud
{"title":"高等教育评估改革面临的挑战:一个遥远的视角","authors":"D. Boud","doi":"10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can we be sure that assessment in higher education meets the need of developing and assuring high quality learning outcomes? Current assessment is typically a collection of conventional practices that have never been seriously questioned. Ten years ago, as part of a national project, representatives from Australian universities came together to identify an agenda for change in assessment. The resulting document—Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education—focused on how assessment needed to change to support long term learning. That is, not how students can pass the next exam, but learning that is useful beyond the point of graduation. From a learning-centred view this paper examine progress on assessment reform in universities internationally from the perspective of one of the players. It starts by considering Assessment 2020 to see where action is still needed. It reviews some of the major shifts in assessment in higher education and considers their implications. These include the move from comparing students (norm-referencing) to judging outcomes against standards (standards-based); and importantly, the conceptual shift from the single purpose of assessment as certifying students to multiple purposes including aiding learning and building the capacity of students to make their own judgements.","PeriodicalId":51855,"journal":{"name":"RELIEVE-Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in reforming higher education assessment: a perspective from afar\",\"authors\":\"D. Boud\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can we be sure that assessment in higher education meets the need of developing and assuring high quality learning outcomes? Current assessment is typically a collection of conventional practices that have never been seriously questioned. Ten years ago, as part of a national project, representatives from Australian universities came together to identify an agenda for change in assessment. The resulting document—Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education—focused on how assessment needed to change to support long term learning. That is, not how students can pass the next exam, but learning that is useful beyond the point of graduation. From a learning-centred view this paper examine progress on assessment reform in universities internationally from the perspective of one of the players. It starts by considering Assessment 2020 to see where action is still needed. It reviews some of the major shifts in assessment in higher education and considers their implications. These include the move from comparing students (norm-referencing) to judging outcomes against standards (standards-based); and importantly, the conceptual shift from the single purpose of assessment as certifying students to multiple purposes including aiding learning and building the capacity of students to make their own judgements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RELIEVE-Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RELIEVE-Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIEVE-Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们能否确保高等教育评估满足发展和确保高质量学习成果的需要?目前的评估通常是从未受到严重质疑的传统做法的集合。十年前,作为一个国家项目的一部分,来自澳大利亚大学的代表聚集在一起,确定了一个评估变革议程。由此产生的文件《2020年评估:高等教育评估改革的七项主张》集中讨论了评估需要如何改变以支持长期学习。也就是说,不是学生如何通过下一次考试,而是学习毕业后有用的东西。本文从以学习为中心的角度,从参与者之一的角度考察了国际大学评估改革的进展。它首先考虑2020年评估,看看哪里还需要采取行动。它回顾了高等教育评估的一些重大转变,并考虑了它们的影响。其中包括从比较学生(标准参考)到根据标准判断结果(基于标准);重要的是,概念上的转变,从认证学生的单一评估目的转变为多种目的,包括帮助学习和培养学生做出自己判断的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges in reforming higher education assessment: a perspective from afar
Can we be sure that assessment in higher education meets the need of developing and assuring high quality learning outcomes? Current assessment is typically a collection of conventional practices that have never been seriously questioned. Ten years ago, as part of a national project, representatives from Australian universities came together to identify an agenda for change in assessment. The resulting document—Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education—focused on how assessment needed to change to support long term learning. That is, not how students can pass the next exam, but learning that is useful beyond the point of graduation. From a learning-centred view this paper examine progress on assessment reform in universities internationally from the perspective of one of the players. It starts by considering Assessment 2020 to see where action is still needed. It reviews some of the major shifts in assessment in higher education and considers their implications. These include the move from comparing students (norm-referencing) to judging outcomes against standards (standards-based); and importantly, the conceptual shift from the single purpose of assessment as certifying students to multiple purposes including aiding learning and building the capacity of students to make their own judgements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Motivación y rendimiento académico en la adolescencia: una revisión sistemática meta-analítica Percepción del profesorado universitario sobre la calidad de las tareas de evaluación de los resultados de aprendizaje Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica Diversity Experience Index Informs Sense of Belonging Identidad Sexual: Configuraciones de significado desde discursos activos y prescriptivos del cuerpo académico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1