家庭内部决策中的性别动态是否随着男性迁移而改变?来自印度东部稻农家庭的证据

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gender Technology & Development Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.1080/09718524.2022.2140381
Rohini Ram Mohan, R. Puskur, D. Chandrasekar, H. Valera
{"title":"家庭内部决策中的性别动态是否随着男性迁移而改变?来自印度东部稻农家庭的证据","authors":"Rohini Ram Mohan, R. Puskur, D. Chandrasekar, H. Valera","doi":"10.1080/09718524.2022.2140381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper unpacks the complex relationship between migration of men and the decision making power of the women who “stay behind” in Bihar, Eastern India. We use mixed methods research design to assess whether women perceive a shift in decision making “authority” between different members in households where men migrate and examine the subjective meanings of these shifts. Using a retrospective survey, we map the extent to which women report shifts in decision making “authority” after the migration of male members. Decision making is examined for various activities classified into four domains: agricultural practices, labor allocation, machinery and purchase of productive assets, and household expenditure and activities. Overall, patterns indicate a nominal change in the proportional distribution of perceived household decision authority for all categories and shift toward joint decision making (by wife and husband) emerging as an important trajectory. Using multinomial regression and interpretative analysis of qualitative findings, the paper sheds light on the role of age, family type, household and migrant characteristics in shaping the direction of shifts, and limiting the transfer of meaningful bargaining power to women. The paper makes a case that the transformation of the patriarchal habitus requires a more substantial transformation of livelihood capitals.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"27 1","pages":"157 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do gender dynamics in intra-household decision making shift with male migration? Evidence from rice-farming households in Eastern India\",\"authors\":\"Rohini Ram Mohan, R. Puskur, D. Chandrasekar, H. Valera\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09718524.2022.2140381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper unpacks the complex relationship between migration of men and the decision making power of the women who “stay behind” in Bihar, Eastern India. We use mixed methods research design to assess whether women perceive a shift in decision making “authority” between different members in households where men migrate and examine the subjective meanings of these shifts. Using a retrospective survey, we map the extent to which women report shifts in decision making “authority” after the migration of male members. Decision making is examined for various activities classified into four domains: agricultural practices, labor allocation, machinery and purchase of productive assets, and household expenditure and activities. Overall, patterns indicate a nominal change in the proportional distribution of perceived household decision authority for all categories and shift toward joint decision making (by wife and husband) emerging as an important trajectory. Using multinomial regression and interpretative analysis of qualitative findings, the paper sheds light on the role of age, family type, household and migrant characteristics in shaping the direction of shifts, and limiting the transfer of meaningful bargaining power to women. The paper makes a case that the transformation of the patriarchal habitus requires a more substantial transformation of livelihood capitals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2140381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2140381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文剖析了印度东部比哈尔邦男性移民与留守女性决策权之间的复杂关系。我们使用混合方法研究设计来评估女性是否感知到在男性迁移的家庭中不同成员之间决策“权威”的转移,并检查这些转移的主观含义。通过回顾性调查,我们绘制了女性在男性成员迁移后报告决策“权威”转移的程度。决策被分为四个领域:农业实践、劳动力分配、机械和生产资产的购买,以及家庭支出和活动。总体而言,模式表明,在所有类别的感知家庭决策权的比例分布名义上的变化,并转向共同决策(由妻子和丈夫)正在成为一个重要的轨迹。本文利用多项回归和对定性结果的解释分析,揭示了年龄、家庭类型、家庭和移民特征在塑造转移方向方面的作用,并限制了有意义的议价能力向女性的转移。本文认为,父权习惯的转变需要更实质性的生计资本转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do gender dynamics in intra-household decision making shift with male migration? Evidence from rice-farming households in Eastern India
Abstract This paper unpacks the complex relationship between migration of men and the decision making power of the women who “stay behind” in Bihar, Eastern India. We use mixed methods research design to assess whether women perceive a shift in decision making “authority” between different members in households where men migrate and examine the subjective meanings of these shifts. Using a retrospective survey, we map the extent to which women report shifts in decision making “authority” after the migration of male members. Decision making is examined for various activities classified into four domains: agricultural practices, labor allocation, machinery and purchase of productive assets, and household expenditure and activities. Overall, patterns indicate a nominal change in the proportional distribution of perceived household decision authority for all categories and shift toward joint decision making (by wife and husband) emerging as an important trajectory. Using multinomial regression and interpretative analysis of qualitative findings, the paper sheds light on the role of age, family type, household and migrant characteristics in shaping the direction of shifts, and limiting the transfer of meaningful bargaining power to women. The paper makes a case that the transformation of the patriarchal habitus requires a more substantial transformation of livelihood capitals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program What agricultural transition means for women in male-headed households in South Asia: an in-depth exploration of intrahousehold evaluation processes Women’s (im)mobility strategies and digital platform adoption: the case study of employees doing desk work in Pune, India Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa Women fish vendors in Kerala, India: an analytical study of access to inputs and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1