学生参与在线研究生创业课程:证明符合AACSB标准

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2022.2066058
J. Black, Bethany A. Davidson
{"title":"学生参与在线研究生创业课程:证明符合AACSB标准","authors":"J. Black, Bethany A. Davidson","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2022.2066058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We demonstrate evaluating levels of student engagement in online classes for accreditation. By synthesizing four categories of student engagement (Hillman, Willis, & Gunawardena, 1994) and individual activities from Adler (2020), we extend and use a comprehensive set of student engagement activities for assessment. This systematic evaluation enables determining if the desired level (Carnegie-unit standard of 8,100 min) and variety of student engagement is reached. By assessing two online Master of Entrepreneurship classes in a Southeastern U.S. regional university. Our findings indicate both classes have 8,100+ min of engagement and patterns of using multiple engagement categories. We provide a method for quantifying the level of faculty-student and student-student engagement using an evaluation of two online courses to support that AACSB standards for engagement are met in online programs.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"98 1","pages":"156 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student engagement in online graduate entrepreneurship classes: Demonstrating meeting AACSB standards\",\"authors\":\"J. Black, Bethany A. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2022.2066058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We demonstrate evaluating levels of student engagement in online classes for accreditation. By synthesizing four categories of student engagement (Hillman, Willis, & Gunawardena, 1994) and individual activities from Adler (2020), we extend and use a comprehensive set of student engagement activities for assessment. This systematic evaluation enables determining if the desired level (Carnegie-unit standard of 8,100 min) and variety of student engagement is reached. By assessing two online Master of Entrepreneurship classes in a Southeastern U.S. regional university. Our findings indicate both classes have 8,100+ min of engagement and patterns of using multiple engagement categories. We provide a method for quantifying the level of faculty-student and student-student engagement using an evaluation of two online courses to support that AACSB standards for engagement are met in online programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2066058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2066058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:我们展示了评估学生在在线课程中的参与程度以获得认证。通过综合四类学生参与(Hillman,Willis,&Gunawardena,1994)和Adler(2020)的个人活动,我们扩展并使用了一套全面的学生参与活动进行评估。这种系统的评估能够确定所需的水平(卡内基8100的单位标准 min),并达到学生参与的多样性。通过评估美国东南部一所地区大学的两门在线创业硕士课程。我们的研究结果表明,这两个类别都有8100分钟以上的参与度和使用多个参与类别的模式。我们通过对两门在线课程的评估,提供了一种量化师生参与度的方法,以支持AACSB在在线课程中达到参与度标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student engagement in online graduate entrepreneurship classes: Demonstrating meeting AACSB standards
Abstract We demonstrate evaluating levels of student engagement in online classes for accreditation. By synthesizing four categories of student engagement (Hillman, Willis, & Gunawardena, 1994) and individual activities from Adler (2020), we extend and use a comprehensive set of student engagement activities for assessment. This systematic evaluation enables determining if the desired level (Carnegie-unit standard of 8,100 min) and variety of student engagement is reached. By assessing two online Master of Entrepreneurship classes in a Southeastern U.S. regional university. Our findings indicate both classes have 8,100+ min of engagement and patterns of using multiple engagement categories. We provide a method for quantifying the level of faculty-student and student-student engagement using an evaluation of two online courses to support that AACSB standards for engagement are met in online programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Business
Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of student evaluations: Exploring the effects of course modality and type in graduate business courses Embedded SDGs in undergraduate business sustainability programs curricula We have talent: Mock group interviewing improves employer perceived competence on hireability Unveiling student intention towards entrepreneurship development—a bibliometric investigation Measuring the impact of faculty development programmes on business schools’ performance in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1