平板电脑与书本学习:黎巴嫩儿童记忆、注意力和学习能力的关系

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-27 DOI:10.1080/17450128.2022.2042447
Jessika Tawil, C. Haddad, Youssef Farchakh, H. Sacre, Rita Nabout, S. Obeid, P. Salameh, S. Hallit
{"title":"平板电脑与书本学习:黎巴嫩儿童记忆、注意力和学习能力的关系","authors":"Jessika Tawil, C. Haddad, Youssef Farchakh, H. Sacre, Rita Nabout, S. Obeid, P. Salameh, S. Hallit","doi":"10.1080/17450128.2022.2042447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Lebanon, the methods of teaching employed are mostly conventional. Teachers spend a lot of time giving lessons and homework to students, as well as reading assignments and correcting exercises completed in class. Students usually play a passive role in the education process; they listen calmly, occasionally question what is presented, and copy texts and information dictated by the teacher. Textbooks are the major source of instruction, yet many Lebanese schools have partially introduced electronic devices, and have discreetly started to rely on them. Given the reported discrepancies between textbooks and tablets learning, it was essential to conduct a Lebanese study that compares both entities. To assess the influence of textbooks and tablets on cognition and attention, it was also necessary to consider the schooling age that is critical for understanding the human brain and cognition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the association between of tablet vs. book learning on memory, attention, and learning abilities among Lebanese children. This cross-sectional study, conducted between January-May 2019, enrolled 566 students aged of 11–13 years. Two schools were chosen conveniently for this study, one of them uses the Tablet and text books for students’ learning whereas the second one uses text books exclusively. Students were randomly chosen from the list given by the school administration. Textbook learning was significantly associated with better episodic and visual memory, better attention, processing speed and mathematic skills compared to tablets and textbook learning. Learning is evolving to another level and forever changing. Many studies should be conducted in order to understand the importance of merging new and old techniques to ensure that the next generations are receiving what can positively affect their cognitive skills and their performance.","PeriodicalId":46101,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"393 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tablet vs. Book learning: association with memory, attention, and learning abilities among lebanese children\",\"authors\":\"Jessika Tawil, C. Haddad, Youssef Farchakh, H. Sacre, Rita Nabout, S. Obeid, P. Salameh, S. Hallit\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17450128.2022.2042447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In Lebanon, the methods of teaching employed are mostly conventional. Teachers spend a lot of time giving lessons and homework to students, as well as reading assignments and correcting exercises completed in class. Students usually play a passive role in the education process; they listen calmly, occasionally question what is presented, and copy texts and information dictated by the teacher. Textbooks are the major source of instruction, yet many Lebanese schools have partially introduced electronic devices, and have discreetly started to rely on them. Given the reported discrepancies between textbooks and tablets learning, it was essential to conduct a Lebanese study that compares both entities. To assess the influence of textbooks and tablets on cognition and attention, it was also necessary to consider the schooling age that is critical for understanding the human brain and cognition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the association between of tablet vs. book learning on memory, attention, and learning abilities among Lebanese children. This cross-sectional study, conducted between January-May 2019, enrolled 566 students aged of 11–13 years. Two schools were chosen conveniently for this study, one of them uses the Tablet and text books for students’ learning whereas the second one uses text books exclusively. Students were randomly chosen from the list given by the school administration. Textbook learning was significantly associated with better episodic and visual memory, better attention, processing speed and mathematic skills compared to tablets and textbook learning. Learning is evolving to another level and forever changing. Many studies should be conducted in order to understand the importance of merging new and old techniques to ensure that the next generations are receiving what can positively affect their cognitive skills and their performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"393 - 405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2042447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2042447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在黎巴嫩,采用的教学方法大多是传统的。老师花很多时间给学生上课和做作业,以及阅读作业和批改课堂上完成的练习。学生通常在教育过程中扮演被动的角色;他们平静地听着,偶尔会对所呈现的内容提出质疑,并抄写老师口授的文本和信息。教科书是教学的主要来源,但许多黎巴嫩学校已经部分引进电子设备,并谨慎地开始依赖它们。鉴于教科书和平板电脑学习之间所报告的差异,有必要进行一项黎巴嫩研究,对这两个实体进行比较。为了评估教科书和平板电脑对认知和注意力的影响,也有必要考虑上学年龄,这是了解人类大脑和认知的关键。因此,本研究的目的是评估平板电脑与书本学习对黎巴嫩儿童记忆、注意力和学习能力的影响。这项横断面研究于2019年1月至5月进行,招募了566名11-13岁的学生。我们方便地选择了两所学校进行研究,其中一所学校使用平板电脑和教科书进行学生学习,而另一所学校则完全使用教科书。学生是从学校行政部门提供的名单中随机抽取的。与平板电脑和教科书学习相比,教科书学习与更好的情景记忆和视觉记忆、更好的注意力、处理速度和数学技能显著相关。学习正在向另一个层次发展,并且永远在变化。为了了解新旧技术结合的重要性,应该进行许多研究,以确保下一代接受能够对他们的认知技能和表现产生积极影响的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tablet vs. Book learning: association with memory, attention, and learning abilities among lebanese children
ABSTRACT In Lebanon, the methods of teaching employed are mostly conventional. Teachers spend a lot of time giving lessons and homework to students, as well as reading assignments and correcting exercises completed in class. Students usually play a passive role in the education process; they listen calmly, occasionally question what is presented, and copy texts and information dictated by the teacher. Textbooks are the major source of instruction, yet many Lebanese schools have partially introduced electronic devices, and have discreetly started to rely on them. Given the reported discrepancies between textbooks and tablets learning, it was essential to conduct a Lebanese study that compares both entities. To assess the influence of textbooks and tablets on cognition and attention, it was also necessary to consider the schooling age that is critical for understanding the human brain and cognition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the association between of tablet vs. book learning on memory, attention, and learning abilities among Lebanese children. This cross-sectional study, conducted between January-May 2019, enrolled 566 students aged of 11–13 years. Two schools were chosen conveniently for this study, one of them uses the Tablet and text books for students’ learning whereas the second one uses text books exclusively. Students were randomly chosen from the list given by the school administration. Textbook learning was significantly associated with better episodic and visual memory, better attention, processing speed and mathematic skills compared to tablets and textbook learning. Learning is evolving to another level and forever changing. Many studies should be conducted in order to understand the importance of merging new and old techniques to ensure that the next generations are receiving what can positively affect their cognitive skills and their performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies is an essential peer-reviewed journal analyzing psychological, sociological, health, gender, cultural, economic, and educational aspects of children and adolescents in developed and developing countries. This international publication forum provides a much-needed interdisciplinary focus on vulnerable children and youth at risk, specifically in relation to health and welfare issues, such as mental health, illness (including HIV/AIDS), disability, abuse, neglect, institutionalization, poverty, orphanhood, exploitation, war, famine, and disaster.
期刊最新文献
Assessing depression, suicidal behaviors and quality of life in adolescents with chronic illness: the potential role of SDQ-DP scores Assessment of family functioning in adolescents who use substances- a cross-sectional comparative study Condom use correlates among youth living with HIV in South Africa: lessons for promoting safer sex Parenting practices and adolescents’ mental health: Serial mediation by parental acceptance and adolescents’ grit Examining HIV-stigma interventions among youth living in sub-Sahara Africa: a systematic review of the evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1