l -天冬酰胺酶使用的实践:在印度治疗儿童癌症的医疗保健提供者的调查

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1767811
Archana Mv, Kalasekhar Vs, Vinay Munikoty, R. Bhat, Atul Achyutrao, Vani Lakshmi R, V. Bhat K
{"title":"l -天冬酰胺酶使用的实践:在印度治疗儿童癌症的医疗保健提供者的调查","authors":"Archana Mv, Kalasekhar Vs, Vinay Munikoty, R. Bhat, Atul Achyutrao, Vani Lakshmi R, V. Bhat K","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1767811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Vasudeva Bhat K Introduction  L-asparaginase is an essential chemotherapeutic agent in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which has led to improvement in survival. In low- and middle-income countries like India, the outcomes in ALL are inferior compared with the published literature, one of the causes of which is believed to be due to the inferior quality of bioequivalent asparaginase. Objective  The following survey attempts to understand the practice of using this agent among oncologists treating children with cancer in our country. Methods  The researchers designed a structured online questionnaire comprising 25 aspects of L-asparaginase usage in the study. The questionnaire was directed to the healthcare providers involved in treating children with cancer in India. Results  Of the total 80 responses recorded, 51 (64%) respondents had more than 5 years of experience in pediatric oncology and were treating at least 5 to 10 newly diagnosed ALL patients per month. Forty-one (51%) respondents utilized native asparaginase, and 21 (26.3%) oncologists used PEGylated-asparaginase exclusively. The most common route of administration was the intramuscular route (66.3%). Seventy percent of respondents utilized native form at a dose of 10,000 IU/m 2 and 20% at 6,000 IU/m 2 . The amounts used for PEGylated L-asparaginase were 1,000,IU/m 2 , 2,500,IU/m 2 , and variable doses in 48, 40, and 10% of responses, respectively. Though serum asparaginase assay (SAA) was not measured routinely in most of the centers, 39 (48.8%) healthcare providers perceived performing SAA helps to make the clinical decision. Conclusion  This survey shows a wide variation in L-asparaginase usage among healthcare providers caring for children with cancer in our country. As L-asparaginase is the pivotal component of ALL therapy, uniformity in its usage and dosing with the possibility of monitoring SAA due to the quality of bioequivalent may be one of the critical steps toward improving outcomes in ALL in our country.","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice of L-Asparaginase Usage: A Survey among Healthcare Providers Treating Children with Cancer in India\",\"authors\":\"Archana Mv, Kalasekhar Vs, Vinay Munikoty, R. Bhat, Atul Achyutrao, Vani Lakshmi R, V. Bhat K\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1767811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Vasudeva Bhat K Introduction  L-asparaginase is an essential chemotherapeutic agent in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which has led to improvement in survival. In low- and middle-income countries like India, the outcomes in ALL are inferior compared with the published literature, one of the causes of which is believed to be due to the inferior quality of bioequivalent asparaginase. Objective  The following survey attempts to understand the practice of using this agent among oncologists treating children with cancer in our country. Methods  The researchers designed a structured online questionnaire comprising 25 aspects of L-asparaginase usage in the study. The questionnaire was directed to the healthcare providers involved in treating children with cancer in India. Results  Of the total 80 responses recorded, 51 (64%) respondents had more than 5 years of experience in pediatric oncology and were treating at least 5 to 10 newly diagnosed ALL patients per month. Forty-one (51%) respondents utilized native asparaginase, and 21 (26.3%) oncologists used PEGylated-asparaginase exclusively. The most common route of administration was the intramuscular route (66.3%). Seventy percent of respondents utilized native form at a dose of 10,000 IU/m 2 and 20% at 6,000 IU/m 2 . The amounts used for PEGylated L-asparaginase were 1,000,IU/m 2 , 2,500,IU/m 2 , and variable doses in 48, 40, and 10% of responses, respectively. Though serum asparaginase assay (SAA) was not measured routinely in most of the centers, 39 (48.8%) healthcare providers perceived performing SAA helps to make the clinical decision. Conclusion  This survey shows a wide variation in L-asparaginase usage among healthcare providers caring for children with cancer in our country. As L-asparaginase is the pivotal component of ALL therapy, uniformity in its usage and dosing with the possibility of monitoring SAA due to the quality of bioequivalent may be one of the critical steps toward improving outcomes in ALL in our country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1767811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1767811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

l -天冬酰胺酶是急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL)治疗中必不可少的化疗药物,可提高患者的生存率。在印度等低收入和中等收入国家,ALL的预后不如已发表的文献,其原因之一被认为是由于生物等效天冬酰胺酶的质量较差。目的通过以下调查,了解我国肿瘤学家在治疗儿童癌症时使用本品的情况。方法研究人员设计了一份结构化的在线问卷,包括研究中l -天冬酰胺酶使用的25个方面。调查问卷的对象是参与治疗印度癌症儿童的医疗保健提供者。结果在记录的80个应答者中,51个(64%)应答者有超过5年的儿科肿瘤学经验,并且每个月至少治疗5到10个新诊断的ALL患者。41位(51%)受访者使用天然天冬酰胺酶,21位(26.3%)肿瘤学家只使用聚乙二醇化天冬酰胺酶。最常见的给药途径是肌内给药(66.3%)。70%的答复者使用天然形式,剂量为10,000 IU/ m2, 20%为6,000 IU/ m2。聚乙二醇化l -天冬酰胺酶的用量分别为1,000、IU/ m2、2,500、IU/ m2,并在48%、40%和10%的应答中采用可变剂量。虽然大多数中心没有常规测量血清天冬酰胺酶测定(SAA),但39(48.8%)医疗保健提供者认为执行SAA有助于做出临床决定。结论本调查显示,在我国照顾癌症儿童的医疗保健提供者中,l -天冬酰胺酶的使用存在很大差异。由于l -天冬酰胺酶是ALL治疗的关键成分,其使用和剂量的一致性以及由于生物等效性的质量而监测SAA的可能性可能是改善我国ALL治疗结果的关键步骤之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practice of L-Asparaginase Usage: A Survey among Healthcare Providers Treating Children with Cancer in India
Abstract Vasudeva Bhat K Introduction  L-asparaginase is an essential chemotherapeutic agent in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which has led to improvement in survival. In low- and middle-income countries like India, the outcomes in ALL are inferior compared with the published literature, one of the causes of which is believed to be due to the inferior quality of bioequivalent asparaginase. Objective  The following survey attempts to understand the practice of using this agent among oncologists treating children with cancer in our country. Methods  The researchers designed a structured online questionnaire comprising 25 aspects of L-asparaginase usage in the study. The questionnaire was directed to the healthcare providers involved in treating children with cancer in India. Results  Of the total 80 responses recorded, 51 (64%) respondents had more than 5 years of experience in pediatric oncology and were treating at least 5 to 10 newly diagnosed ALL patients per month. Forty-one (51%) respondents utilized native asparaginase, and 21 (26.3%) oncologists used PEGylated-asparaginase exclusively. The most common route of administration was the intramuscular route (66.3%). Seventy percent of respondents utilized native form at a dose of 10,000 IU/m 2 and 20% at 6,000 IU/m 2 . The amounts used for PEGylated L-asparaginase were 1,000,IU/m 2 , 2,500,IU/m 2 , and variable doses in 48, 40, and 10% of responses, respectively. Though serum asparaginase assay (SAA) was not measured routinely in most of the centers, 39 (48.8%) healthcare providers perceived performing SAA helps to make the clinical decision. Conclusion  This survey shows a wide variation in L-asparaginase usage among healthcare providers caring for children with cancer in our country. As L-asparaginase is the pivotal component of ALL therapy, uniformity in its usage and dosing with the possibility of monitoring SAA due to the quality of bioequivalent may be one of the critical steps toward improving outcomes in ALL in our country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Staging and Management of Cervical Cancer at the Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh. COVID-19 Impact on Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancers at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram-An Audit. Do Uro-Oncology Day Care Procedures Need to Be Differed during COVID-19 Pandemic?-An Experience from Tertiary Cancer Care Center. Colorectal Origin: A Marker of Favorable Outcome in Krukenberg Tumor? Results from Clinical and Prognostic Analysis. Cytogenetic Alterations and Correlation with Age and Gender in Patients of Multiple Myeloma: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1