机器人在创伤和骨科中的作用

Q4 Medicine Orthopaedics and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mporth.2023.05.001
Michael L. Robinson, Benedict A. Rogers
{"title":"机器人在创伤和骨科中的作用","authors":"Michael L. Robinson,&nbsp;Benedict A. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.mporth.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Whilst robotics have been used in surgery since their first application in neurosurgical biopsies in 1985, many surgeons have limited familiarity or experience with robotics through access or exposure to current or developing applications, particularly the systems that have brought robotics to orthopaedics. This paper reviews the well-established applications of operative orthopaedic robotics, developing and future applications, and extraoperative surgical robotics, with due consideration to their limitations. This review describes the different types of fundamental robotic systems, including master–slave, passive, semi-active and active systems. Its discussion of system types gives the reader insight into the different relationships between surgeon and robot, varying from full active systems, autonomous image-based surgical operating, through to the master–slave direct relationship with the surgeon, with the robot's replication of the surgeon's live tracked movements. A review of widely adopted systems within </span>arthroplasty and developing concepts allows the reader to develop their understanding of how these systems operate and their future potential, giving a broad understanding of robotics. This narrative review discusses the fundamentals of orthopaedic robotics, as </span>systematic reviews of each application, their data sets and evidence have been documented elsewhere. The paper concludes by highlighting the advantages of robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery, such as precision and reproducibility, and insight into the future of orthopaedic robotics and provides a useful basis for understanding the role of robotics in orthopaedics and their potential applications for surgeons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39547,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of robotics in trauma and orthopaedics\",\"authors\":\"Michael L. Robinson,&nbsp;Benedict A. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mporth.2023.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Whilst robotics have been used in surgery since their first application in neurosurgical biopsies in 1985, many surgeons have limited familiarity or experience with robotics through access or exposure to current or developing applications, particularly the systems that have brought robotics to orthopaedics. This paper reviews the well-established applications of operative orthopaedic robotics, developing and future applications, and extraoperative surgical robotics, with due consideration to their limitations. This review describes the different types of fundamental robotic systems, including master–slave, passive, semi-active and active systems. Its discussion of system types gives the reader insight into the different relationships between surgeon and robot, varying from full active systems, autonomous image-based surgical operating, through to the master–slave direct relationship with the surgeon, with the robot's replication of the surgeon's live tracked movements. A review of widely adopted systems within </span>arthroplasty and developing concepts allows the reader to develop their understanding of how these systems operate and their future potential, giving a broad understanding of robotics. This narrative review discusses the fundamentals of orthopaedic robotics, as </span>systematic reviews of each application, their data sets and evidence have been documented elsewhere. The paper concludes by highlighting the advantages of robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery, such as precision and reproducibility, and insight into the future of orthopaedic robotics and provides a useful basis for understanding the role of robotics in orthopaedics and their potential applications for surgeons.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877132723000544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877132723000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然机器人技术自1985年首次应用于神经外科活检以来一直被用于外科手术,但由于接触或接触到当前或正在开发的应用,特别是将机器人技术引入骨科的系统,许多外科医生对机器人技术的熟悉程度或经验有限。本文综述了整形外科机器人技术的成熟应用、发展和未来应用以及手术外外科机器人技术,并适当考虑了它们的局限性。这篇综述描述了不同类型的基本机器人系统,包括主从、被动、半主动和主动系统。它对系统类型的讨论让读者深入了解了外科医生和机器人之间的不同关系,从全主动系统、基于图像的自主手术,到与外科医生的主从直接关系,以及机器人对外科医生实时跟踪运动的复制。通过回顾关节成形术中广泛采用的系统和开发概念,读者可以了解这些系统的操作方式及其未来潜力,从而对机器人技术有广泛的了解。这篇叙述性综述讨论了整形外科机器人的基本原理,因为对每一项应用、其数据集和证据的系统综述已在其他地方记录在案。论文最后强调了机器人系统在骨科手术中的优势,如精度和可重复性,以及对骨科机器人未来的见解,并为理解机器人在骨科中的作用及其对外科医生的潜在应用提供了有用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of robotics in trauma and orthopaedics

Whilst robotics have been used in surgery since their first application in neurosurgical biopsies in 1985, many surgeons have limited familiarity or experience with robotics through access or exposure to current or developing applications, particularly the systems that have brought robotics to orthopaedics. This paper reviews the well-established applications of operative orthopaedic robotics, developing and future applications, and extraoperative surgical robotics, with due consideration to their limitations. This review describes the different types of fundamental robotic systems, including master–slave, passive, semi-active and active systems. Its discussion of system types gives the reader insight into the different relationships between surgeon and robot, varying from full active systems, autonomous image-based surgical operating, through to the master–slave direct relationship with the surgeon, with the robot's replication of the surgeon's live tracked movements. A review of widely adopted systems within arthroplasty and developing concepts allows the reader to develop their understanding of how these systems operate and their future potential, giving a broad understanding of robotics. This narrative review discusses the fundamentals of orthopaedic robotics, as systematic reviews of each application, their data sets and evidence have been documented elsewhere. The paper concludes by highlighting the advantages of robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery, such as precision and reproducibility, and insight into the future of orthopaedic robotics and provides a useful basis for understanding the role of robotics in orthopaedics and their potential applications for surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedics and Trauma
Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics and Trauma presents a unique collection of International review articles summarizing the current state of knowledge and research in orthopaedics. Each issue focuses on a specific topic, discussed in depth in a mini-symposium; other articles cover the areas of basic science, medicine, children/adults, trauma, imaging and historical review. There is also an annotation, self-assessment questions and a second opinion section. In this way the entire postgraduate syllabus will be covered in a 4-year cycle.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Developmental hip dysplasia: which osteotomy, when? Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease: pertinent information for orthopaedic exam candidates Congenital lower limb differences: an overview and common presentations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1