有两种治疗和一种安慰剂的交叉试验的可选分析

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis Pub Date : 2020-02-05 DOI:10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16
J. Divecha, Jigneshkumar Gondaliya
{"title":"有两种治疗和一种安慰剂的交叉试验的可选分析","authors":"J. Divecha, Jigneshkumar Gondaliya","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assumption of carryover effects is unavoidable due to the very nature of crossover designs. Even in case of crossover design with washout period, the hypothesis of no carryover effect should be tested and established. On the other hand, this assumption makes the analysis difficult and potentially biased or inefficient in case of two treatment two period crossover design. For a reasonable estimation, experimenters are advocated to employ a two period three treatment crossover designs, or a three period two treatment crossover design. In this article, we present optional analyses of a uniform three period three treatment crossover design, consisting of a placebo and two active treatments. We develop a test for detecting presence of carryover effects which directs experimenter for a proper analysis of his crossover trial. We present ANOVA for each of the three possible carryover models, that both, single, or none of the active treatments has carryover effect, and illustrate through an example.","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"16-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optional analyses of crossover trials having two treatments and a placebo\",\"authors\":\"J. Divecha, Jigneshkumar Gondaliya\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assumption of carryover effects is unavoidable due to the very nature of crossover designs. Even in case of crossover design with washout period, the hypothesis of no carryover effect should be tested and established. On the other hand, this assumption makes the analysis difficult and potentially biased or inefficient in case of two treatment two period crossover design. For a reasonable estimation, experimenters are advocated to employ a two period three treatment crossover designs, or a three period two treatment crossover design. In this article, we present optional analyses of a uniform three period three treatment crossover design, consisting of a placebo and two active treatments. We develop a test for detecting presence of carryover effects which directs experimenter for a proper analysis of his crossover trial. We present ANOVA for each of the three possible carryover models, that both, single, or none of the active treatments has carryover effect, and illustrate through an example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"16-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于交叉设计的本质,结转效应的假设是不可避免的。即使是有洗脱期的交叉设计,也要检验和建立无结转效应的假设。另一方面,这种假设使分析变得困难,并且在两种治疗两期交叉设计的情况下可能存在偏差或效率低下。为了合理估计,建议实验者采用两期三处理交叉设计,或三期两处理交叉设计。在本文中,我们提出了统一的三期三治疗交叉设计的可选分析,包括安慰剂和两种积极治疗。我们开发了一种检测遗留效应存在的测试,指导实验者对他的交叉试验进行适当的分析。我们对三种可能的结转模型中的每一种都提出了方差分析,即两种、单一或没有一种积极的治疗都具有结转效果,并通过一个例子来说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optional analyses of crossover trials having two treatments and a placebo
The assumption of carryover effects is unavoidable due to the very nature of crossover designs. Even in case of crossover design with washout period, the hypothesis of no carryover effect should be tested and established. On the other hand, this assumption makes the analysis difficult and potentially biased or inefficient in case of two treatment two period crossover design. For a reasonable estimation, experimenters are advocated to employ a two period three treatment crossover designs, or a three period two treatment crossover design. In this article, we present optional analyses of a uniform three period three treatment crossover design, consisting of a placebo and two active treatments. We develop a test for detecting presence of carryover effects which directs experimenter for a proper analysis of his crossover trial. We present ANOVA for each of the three possible carryover models, that both, single, or none of the active treatments has carryover effect, and illustrate through an example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Data Analysis of Accuracy of US Weather Forecastes Extended asymmetry model based on logit transformation and decomposition of symmetry for square contingency tables with ordered categories Generalized Quasi Lindley Distribution: Theoretical Properties, Estimation Methods, and Applications Almost unbiased ridge estimator in the count data regression models Does the elimination of work flexibility contribute to reducing wage inequality? Empirical evidence from Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1