NIST弹道学工具标记研究数据库

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-20 DOI:10.6028/jres.125.004
X. Zheng, J. Soons, R. Thompson, Sushama Singh, Cerasela Constantin
{"title":"NIST弹道学工具标记研究数据库","authors":"X. Zheng, J. Soons, R. Thompson, Sushama Singh, Cerasela Constantin","doi":"10.6028/jres.125.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009, a report by the National Academies called into question, amongst other\n issues, the objectivity of visual toolmark identification by firearms examiners. The\n National Academies recommended development of objective toolmark identification criteria\n and error rate estimates. Industry, academia, and government laboratories are pursuing\n two promising approaches towards this goal: 1) development of mathematical criteria and\n advanced algorithms for the objective and automated identification and scoring of\n potential matches, and 2) supplementing traditional reflectance microscopy images with\n three- dimensional surface topography measurement data. Development and validation of\n both these approaches to objective toolmark identification are hindered by a lack of\n access to toolmark data sets that 1) represent the large variety of ballistic toolmarks\n encountered by toolmark examiners, and 2) represent challenging identification\n scenarios, such as those posed by consecutively manufactured firearms components. The\n NIST Ballistics Toolmark Research Database enables researchers to test and validate new\n approaches to objective, mathematics-based, toolmark identification while easing the\n transition to three- dimensional surface topography data. The database will provide a\n foundation for a scientific knowledge base on the degree of similarity that can be found\n between marks made by different firearms and the variability in marks made by an\n individual firearm. The current, fairly limited, knowledge base is a fundamental barrier\n to the development and validation of objective mathematical similarity criteria, and\n associated confidence limits, applicable to a broad range of firearms and ammunition\n brands.","PeriodicalId":54766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NIST Ballistics Toolmark Research Database\",\"authors\":\"X. Zheng, J. Soons, R. Thompson, Sushama Singh, Cerasela Constantin\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.125.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2009, a report by the National Academies called into question, amongst other\\n issues, the objectivity of visual toolmark identification by firearms examiners. The\\n National Academies recommended development of objective toolmark identification criteria\\n and error rate estimates. Industry, academia, and government laboratories are pursuing\\n two promising approaches towards this goal: 1) development of mathematical criteria and\\n advanced algorithms for the objective and automated identification and scoring of\\n potential matches, and 2) supplementing traditional reflectance microscopy images with\\n three- dimensional surface topography measurement data. Development and validation of\\n both these approaches to objective toolmark identification are hindered by a lack of\\n access to toolmark data sets that 1) represent the large variety of ballistic toolmarks\\n encountered by toolmark examiners, and 2) represent challenging identification\\n scenarios, such as those posed by consecutively manufactured firearms components. The\\n NIST Ballistics Toolmark Research Database enables researchers to test and validate new\\n approaches to objective, mathematics-based, toolmark identification while easing the\\n transition to three- dimensional surface topography data. The database will provide a\\n foundation for a scientific knowledge base on the degree of similarity that can be found\\n between marks made by different firearms and the variability in marks made by an\\n individual firearm. The current, fairly limited, knowledge base is a fundamental barrier\\n to the development and validation of objective mathematical similarity criteria, and\\n associated confidence limits, applicable to a broad range of firearms and ammunition\\n brands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.125.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.125.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2009年,美国国家科学院(National Academies)的一份报告对枪支检查人员视觉工具标记识别的客观性提出了质疑。美国国家科学院建议制定客观的工具标记识别标准和错误率估计。工业界、学术界和政府实验室正在寻求实现这一目标的两种有希望的方法:1)开发数学标准和先进的算法,用于客观和自动识别潜在匹配并评分;2)用三维表面形貌测量数据补充传统的反射显微镜图像。由于缺乏对工具标记数据集的访问,这两种客观工具标记识别方法的开发和验证受到阻碍,这些数据集1)代表了工具标记检验员遇到的各种各样的弹道工具标记,2)代表了具有挑战性的识别场景,例如连续制造的火器部件所构成的场景。NIST弹道学工具标记研究数据库使研究人员能够测试和验证客观的、基于数学的工具标记识别的新方法,同时简化向三维表面形貌数据的过渡。该数据库将为建立一个科学知识库奠定基础,以了解不同枪支所制造的痕迹之间的相似程度以及单个枪支所制造的痕迹的可变性。目前相当有限的知识库是制定和验证适用于各种火器和弹药品牌的客观数学相似标准和相关置信限的根本障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NIST Ballistics Toolmark Research Database
In 2009, a report by the National Academies called into question, amongst other issues, the objectivity of visual toolmark identification by firearms examiners. The National Academies recommended development of objective toolmark identification criteria and error rate estimates. Industry, academia, and government laboratories are pursuing two promising approaches towards this goal: 1) development of mathematical criteria and advanced algorithms for the objective and automated identification and scoring of potential matches, and 2) supplementing traditional reflectance microscopy images with three- dimensional surface topography measurement data. Development and validation of both these approaches to objective toolmark identification are hindered by a lack of access to toolmark data sets that 1) represent the large variety of ballistic toolmarks encountered by toolmark examiners, and 2) represent challenging identification scenarios, such as those posed by consecutively manufactured firearms components. The NIST Ballistics Toolmark Research Database enables researchers to test and validate new approaches to objective, mathematics-based, toolmark identification while easing the transition to three- dimensional surface topography data. The database will provide a foundation for a scientific knowledge base on the degree of similarity that can be found between marks made by different firearms and the variability in marks made by an individual firearm. The current, fairly limited, knowledge base is a fundamental barrier to the development and validation of objective mathematical similarity criteria, and associated confidence limits, applicable to a broad range of firearms and ammunition brands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is the flagship publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been published under various titles and forms since 1904, with its roots as Scientific Papers issued as the Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. In 1928, the Scientific Papers were combined with Technologic Papers, which reported results of investigations of material and methods of testing. This new publication was titled the Bureau of Standards Journal of Research. The Journal of Research of NIST reports NIST research and development in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, information technology.
期刊最新文献
Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation. Capacity Models and Transmission Risk Mitigation: An Engineering Framework to Predict the Effect of Air Disinfection by Germicidal Ultraviolet Radiation. Inactivation of Pathogens in Air Using Ultraviolet Direct Irradiation Below Exposure Limits. Acceptance Testing Methodology for the Production of Standard Reference Material 2806: Medium Test Dust in Hydraulic Fluid. Toward a New Primary Standardization of Radionuclide Massic Activity Using Microcalorimetry and Quantitative Milligram-Scale Samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1