平衡原住民祖先的海洋权利与国家保护和保全海洋环境的义务

Amiel Ian Valdez
{"title":"平衡原住民祖先的海洋权利与国家保护和保全海洋环境的义务","authors":"Amiel Ian Valdez","doi":"10.1163/15718158-23010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThere is a dynamic interplay between the State’s assertion of sovereignty over its territory, and the indigenous peoples’ claim over their traditionally owned seas. As experienced by the indigenous peoples in the Philippines and Australia, this dynamism is about lobbying for the recognition of their native title over ancestral seas, which includes their traditional fishing rights, and facing State interference with their affairs in managing these so-called sea countries. In this context, this article argues that there is sufficient basis for the recognition of an ancestral sea under the core human rights instruments, particularly through the lens of the indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination, right to enjoy or manifest culture, and right to protect their means of subsistence. It further argues that the State has a positive obligation to promote the realisation of ancestral rights, despite the Law of the Sea regime’s strong position on State sovereignty and sovereign rights, as well as a State duty in protecting and preserving the marine environment condition. Hence, there should be greater recognition of the role of indigenous peoples in managing the marine ecosystem of their ancestral seas.","PeriodicalId":35216,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing the Indigenous Peoples’ Ancestral Sea Rights, and the State’s Obligation to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment\",\"authors\":\"Amiel Ian Valdez\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718158-23010002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThere is a dynamic interplay between the State’s assertion of sovereignty over its territory, and the indigenous peoples’ claim over their traditionally owned seas. As experienced by the indigenous peoples in the Philippines and Australia, this dynamism is about lobbying for the recognition of their native title over ancestral seas, which includes their traditional fishing rights, and facing State interference with their affairs in managing these so-called sea countries. In this context, this article argues that there is sufficient basis for the recognition of an ancestral sea under the core human rights instruments, particularly through the lens of the indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination, right to enjoy or manifest culture, and right to protect their means of subsistence. It further argues that the State has a positive obligation to promote the realisation of ancestral rights, despite the Law of the Sea regime’s strong position on State sovereignty and sovereign rights, as well as a State duty in protecting and preserving the marine environment condition. Hence, there should be greater recognition of the role of indigenous peoples in managing the marine ecosystem of their ancestral seas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-23010002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-23010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家对其领土的主权主张与土著人民对其传统拥有的海洋的主权主张之间存在着动态的相互作用。正如菲律宾和澳大利亚土著人民所经历的那样,这种活力是为了游说承认他们对祖先海洋的土著所有权,包括他们的传统捕鱼权,并在管理这些所谓的海洋国家时面临国家对他们事务的干涉。在这方面,本条认为,根据核心人权文书,特别是通过土著人民的自决权、享受或表现文化的权利以及保护其生存手段的权利,承认祖先的海洋是有充分依据的。它进一步辩称,尽管《海洋法》制度对国家主权和主权权利有着强有力的立场,而且国家有义务保护和维护海洋环境状况,但国家仍有促进实现祖先权利的积极义务。因此,应该更多地认识到土著人民在管理其祖先海洋的海洋生态系统方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing the Indigenous Peoples’ Ancestral Sea Rights, and the State’s Obligation to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment
There is a dynamic interplay between the State’s assertion of sovereignty over its territory, and the indigenous peoples’ claim over their traditionally owned seas. As experienced by the indigenous peoples in the Philippines and Australia, this dynamism is about lobbying for the recognition of their native title over ancestral seas, which includes their traditional fishing rights, and facing State interference with their affairs in managing these so-called sea countries. In this context, this article argues that there is sufficient basis for the recognition of an ancestral sea under the core human rights instruments, particularly through the lens of the indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination, right to enjoy or manifest culture, and right to protect their means of subsistence. It further argues that the State has a positive obligation to promote the realisation of ancestral rights, despite the Law of the Sea regime’s strong position on State sovereignty and sovereign rights, as well as a State duty in protecting and preserving the marine environment condition. Hence, there should be greater recognition of the role of indigenous peoples in managing the marine ecosystem of their ancestral seas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is the world’s only law journal offering scholars a forum in which to present comparative, international and national research dealing specifically with issues of law and human rights in the Asia-Pacific region. Neither a lobby group nor tied to any particular ideology, the Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is a scientific journal dedicated to responding to the need for a periodical publication dealing with the legal challenges of human rights issues in one of the world’s most diverse and dynamic regions.
期刊最新文献
Religious Exemptions and the Constitutionality of Vaccine Mandates in the Philippines Equal Representation of Women in the Superior Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis between Pakistan and the United Kingdom Decriminalisation of Adultery in Taiwan Empathy, a Hallmark of Equality: Shaping Fearlessness Into Transformative Decision-Making and Teaching Microverse, Mezzoverse, Macroverse: Protection Against Discrimination in an Artificialised World?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1