城市出租车口号:人民的艺术

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ART AFRICAN ARTS Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1162/afar_a_00697
Daniel E. Agbiboa
{"title":"城市出租车口号:人民的艺术","authors":"Daniel E. Agbiboa","doi":"10.1162/afar_a_00697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary African city runs on informal modes of public transportation. Typically, minibuses provide the core, but motorbikes, tricycles, and shared taxis all contribute to informal transport ecosystems. These privately operated services are ground-level responses to growing demand for mobility in the face of absent or inadequate formal public transportation services. For many African urbanites, it is impossible to imagine city life without its ubiquitous minibuses, which constitute a distinctive feature of many African urban environments and are the stuff of news, gossip, rumors, and urban myths. Far from being mere containers that form part of the mise en scène in African cities, the dilapidated yet decorated bodies of these minibus taxis mirror for urbanites the duplicity of the African city: both as a place filled with hope and joie de vivre and as a redoubt of stuckedness and immiseration. Minibus taxis account for an estimated 80% of Africa’s total motorized trips (Medium 2018), contributing 50% of all motorized traffic in some corridors (Kumar and Barrett 2008: 5). They go by various appellations: danfo1 in Lagos (Fig. 1), trotro in Accra, daladala in Dar es Salaam, poda-poda in Freetown, matatu in Nairobi, otobis in Cairo, car rapides in Dakar, condongueiros in Luanda, gbaka in Abidjan, kamuny in Kampala, magbana in Conakry, sotrama in Bamako, songa kidogo in Kigali, and kombi in Cape Town. Minibuses are supplemented by motorcycle taxis, popularly known as okada in Nigeria, oleiya in Togo, zémidjan in Benin, pikipiki in Kenya, and boda-boda in Uganda. This urban transportation complex expresses, shapes, produces, and refracts political, social, and economic relations. Informal transport indicates an alternate mode of flexible passenger transport services that cater to the urban poor in the Global South. Unlike modern mass transit systems with fixed stops, fares, routes, and timetables, informal transport services have no predictable schedule: “they depart when they have reached maximum capacity and they arrive when they have successfully passed through all the checkpoints, paid all necessary fees and bribes, and fixed all parts that have broken down during the journey” (GreenSimms 2009: 31). The failure of state-owned mass transportation services occasioned the growth and popularity of these local and ostensibly unregulated services. In Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial capital and Africa’s most populous city, okadas emerged in the 1980s as a popular means of mobility for hard-pressed subalterns during a time of massive economic crisis and urban population growth, when increased demand for mobility widened the gap between supply and demand (Agbiboa 2022a). In Nigeria, the Lagos state government aims to phase out the use of the iconic danfos. Former governor Akinwunmi Ambode (2015–2019) lamented that, “When I wake up in the morning and see all these yellow buses ... and then we claim we are a megacity, that is not true and we must acknowledge that that is a faulty connectivity that we are running. Having accepted that, we have to look for the solution and that is why we want to banish yellow buses” (NCR 2017). Ambode’s comment reproduces popular perceptions of Africa’s informal transport sector as a chaotic embarrassment that needs to be “modernized.” The favored substitutes are the Lagos light rail project (also known as Lagos monorail)— contracted to the China Railway Construction Company—and Lagos BRT (bus rapid transit) system,2 generally deemed more befitting of a modernizing megacity with world-class ambitions. This language of modernity combines with an aesthetic mode of governing, or what Asher Ghertner (2011) calls “aesthetic governmentality,” to (re)produce pathological assessments of the African megalopolis, a pathology of which Lagos is its ne plus ultra. The fabric of the African city is perfunctorily read as a planning black hole, an insoluble problem. Johannesburg, for instance, is read as nothing but a “crime city.” In similar vein, the rich complexity of Lagos life is reduced to detritus, disease, and death, reproducing the colonial imaginary of “dirty natives” (Newell 2020) and an “impending apocalypse” (Sommers 2010: 319). This dystopian and Urban Taxi Slogans The People’s Arts","PeriodicalId":45314,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ARTS","volume":"56 1","pages":"42-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban Taxi Slogans: The People's Arts\",\"authors\":\"Daniel E. Agbiboa\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/afar_a_00697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contemporary African city runs on informal modes of public transportation. Typically, minibuses provide the core, but motorbikes, tricycles, and shared taxis all contribute to informal transport ecosystems. These privately operated services are ground-level responses to growing demand for mobility in the face of absent or inadequate formal public transportation services. For many African urbanites, it is impossible to imagine city life without its ubiquitous minibuses, which constitute a distinctive feature of many African urban environments and are the stuff of news, gossip, rumors, and urban myths. Far from being mere containers that form part of the mise en scène in African cities, the dilapidated yet decorated bodies of these minibus taxis mirror for urbanites the duplicity of the African city: both as a place filled with hope and joie de vivre and as a redoubt of stuckedness and immiseration. Minibus taxis account for an estimated 80% of Africa’s total motorized trips (Medium 2018), contributing 50% of all motorized traffic in some corridors (Kumar and Barrett 2008: 5). They go by various appellations: danfo1 in Lagos (Fig. 1), trotro in Accra, daladala in Dar es Salaam, poda-poda in Freetown, matatu in Nairobi, otobis in Cairo, car rapides in Dakar, condongueiros in Luanda, gbaka in Abidjan, kamuny in Kampala, magbana in Conakry, sotrama in Bamako, songa kidogo in Kigali, and kombi in Cape Town. Minibuses are supplemented by motorcycle taxis, popularly known as okada in Nigeria, oleiya in Togo, zémidjan in Benin, pikipiki in Kenya, and boda-boda in Uganda. This urban transportation complex expresses, shapes, produces, and refracts political, social, and economic relations. Informal transport indicates an alternate mode of flexible passenger transport services that cater to the urban poor in the Global South. Unlike modern mass transit systems with fixed stops, fares, routes, and timetables, informal transport services have no predictable schedule: “they depart when they have reached maximum capacity and they arrive when they have successfully passed through all the checkpoints, paid all necessary fees and bribes, and fixed all parts that have broken down during the journey” (GreenSimms 2009: 31). The failure of state-owned mass transportation services occasioned the growth and popularity of these local and ostensibly unregulated services. In Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial capital and Africa’s most populous city, okadas emerged in the 1980s as a popular means of mobility for hard-pressed subalterns during a time of massive economic crisis and urban population growth, when increased demand for mobility widened the gap between supply and demand (Agbiboa 2022a). In Nigeria, the Lagos state government aims to phase out the use of the iconic danfos. Former governor Akinwunmi Ambode (2015–2019) lamented that, “When I wake up in the morning and see all these yellow buses ... and then we claim we are a megacity, that is not true and we must acknowledge that that is a faulty connectivity that we are running. Having accepted that, we have to look for the solution and that is why we want to banish yellow buses” (NCR 2017). Ambode’s comment reproduces popular perceptions of Africa’s informal transport sector as a chaotic embarrassment that needs to be “modernized.” The favored substitutes are the Lagos light rail project (also known as Lagos monorail)— contracted to the China Railway Construction Company—and Lagos BRT (bus rapid transit) system,2 generally deemed more befitting of a modernizing megacity with world-class ambitions. This language of modernity combines with an aesthetic mode of governing, or what Asher Ghertner (2011) calls “aesthetic governmentality,” to (re)produce pathological assessments of the African megalopolis, a pathology of which Lagos is its ne plus ultra. The fabric of the African city is perfunctorily read as a planning black hole, an insoluble problem. Johannesburg, for instance, is read as nothing but a “crime city.” In similar vein, the rich complexity of Lagos life is reduced to detritus, disease, and death, reproducing the colonial imaginary of “dirty natives” (Newell 2020) and an “impending apocalypse” (Sommers 2010: 319). This dystopian and Urban Taxi Slogans The People’s Arts\",\"PeriodicalId\":45314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICAN ARTS\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"42-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICAN ARTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/afar_a_00697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ARTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/afar_a_00697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这座当代非洲城市采用非正式的公共交通方式。通常,小巴是核心,但摩托车、三轮车和共享出租车都有助于非正规交通生态系统。面对缺乏或不充分的正式公共交通服务,这些私营服务是对日益增长的流动性需求的基层回应。对于许多非洲城市人来说,如果没有无处不在的小巴,就无法想象城市生活。小巴是许多非洲城市环境的一个独特特征,也是新闻、八卦、谣言和城市神话的素材。这些小巴出租车的破旧但装饰华丽的车身不仅是构成非洲城市生活的一部分的集装箱,还向都市人反映了非洲城市的双重性:既是一个充满希望和生活乐趣的地方,也是一个停滞和匮乏的堡垒。据估计,小型巴士出租车占非洲机动出行总量的80%(2018年中期),占一些走廊机动交通总量的50%(Kumar和Barrett,2008:5)。它们有各种各样的称谓:拉各斯的danfo1(图1)、阿克拉的trotro、达累斯萨拉姆的daladala、弗里敦的poda poda、内罗毕的matatu、开罗的otobis、达喀尔的car rapides、罗安达的condongueiros、阿比让的gbaka、坎帕拉的kamuny、科纳克里的magbana、巴马科的sotrama、基加利的songa kidogo和开普敦的kombi。小型公共汽车辅以摩托车出租车,在尼日利亚俗称okada,在多哥俗称oleiya,在贝宁称zémidjan,在肯尼亚称pikipiki,在乌干达称boda-boda。这种城市交通综合体表达、塑造、产生和折射政治、社会和经济关系。非正规运输表明了一种灵活的客运服务替代模式,以满足全球南方城市穷人的需求。与具有固定站点、票价、路线和时间表的现代公共交通系统不同,非正规交通服务没有可预测的时间表:“他们在达到最大容量时离开,在成功通过所有检查站、支付所有必要费用和贿赂并修复旅途中出现故障的所有部件时到达”(GreenSimms 2009:31)。国有大众运输服务的失败导致了这些地方性的、表面上不受监管的服务的增长和流行。20世纪80年代,在尼日利亚的商业首都、非洲人口最多的城市拉各斯,在大规模经济危机和城市人口增长的时期,当流动需求的增加扩大了供需差距时,okadas成为压力重重的下层民众的一种流行流动方式(Agbiboa 2022a)。在尼日利亚,拉各斯州政府的目标是逐步淘汰标志性的danfos。前州长Akinwumi Ambode(2015-2019)哀叹道,“当我早上醒来看到所有这些黄色公交车时……然后我们声称我们是一个特大城市,这不是真的,我们必须承认这是我们正在运行的连接故障。接受了这一点后,我们必须寻找解决方案,这就是我们想要淘汰黄色公交车的原因”(NCR 2017)。安博德的评论再现了人们普遍认为非洲非正规交通部门是一个混乱的尴尬局面,需要“现代化”。最受欢迎的替代品是与中国铁建公司签订合同的拉各斯轻轨项目(也称为拉各斯单轨)和拉各斯快速公交系统,2通常被认为更适合一个具有世界级雄心的现代化特大城市。这种现代性语言与美学治理模式相结合,或者Asher Ghartner(2011)所说的“美学治理心态”,以(重新)产生对非洲大都市的病理学评估,拉各斯是其最极端的病理学。这座非洲城市的结构被敷衍地解读为一个规划黑洞,一个无法解决的问题。例如,约翰内斯堡被解读为一个“犯罪城市”。同样,拉各斯生活的丰富复杂性也被简化为碎屑、疾病和死亡,再现了“肮脏的本地人”(Newell 2020)和“即将到来的世界末日”(Sommers 2010:319)的殖民想象。这个反乌托邦和城市出租车的口号人民的艺术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban Taxi Slogans: The People's Arts
The contemporary African city runs on informal modes of public transportation. Typically, minibuses provide the core, but motorbikes, tricycles, and shared taxis all contribute to informal transport ecosystems. These privately operated services are ground-level responses to growing demand for mobility in the face of absent or inadequate formal public transportation services. For many African urbanites, it is impossible to imagine city life without its ubiquitous minibuses, which constitute a distinctive feature of many African urban environments and are the stuff of news, gossip, rumors, and urban myths. Far from being mere containers that form part of the mise en scène in African cities, the dilapidated yet decorated bodies of these minibus taxis mirror for urbanites the duplicity of the African city: both as a place filled with hope and joie de vivre and as a redoubt of stuckedness and immiseration. Minibus taxis account for an estimated 80% of Africa’s total motorized trips (Medium 2018), contributing 50% of all motorized traffic in some corridors (Kumar and Barrett 2008: 5). They go by various appellations: danfo1 in Lagos (Fig. 1), trotro in Accra, daladala in Dar es Salaam, poda-poda in Freetown, matatu in Nairobi, otobis in Cairo, car rapides in Dakar, condongueiros in Luanda, gbaka in Abidjan, kamuny in Kampala, magbana in Conakry, sotrama in Bamako, songa kidogo in Kigali, and kombi in Cape Town. Minibuses are supplemented by motorcycle taxis, popularly known as okada in Nigeria, oleiya in Togo, zémidjan in Benin, pikipiki in Kenya, and boda-boda in Uganda. This urban transportation complex expresses, shapes, produces, and refracts political, social, and economic relations. Informal transport indicates an alternate mode of flexible passenger transport services that cater to the urban poor in the Global South. Unlike modern mass transit systems with fixed stops, fares, routes, and timetables, informal transport services have no predictable schedule: “they depart when they have reached maximum capacity and they arrive when they have successfully passed through all the checkpoints, paid all necessary fees and bribes, and fixed all parts that have broken down during the journey” (GreenSimms 2009: 31). The failure of state-owned mass transportation services occasioned the growth and popularity of these local and ostensibly unregulated services. In Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial capital and Africa’s most populous city, okadas emerged in the 1980s as a popular means of mobility for hard-pressed subalterns during a time of massive economic crisis and urban population growth, when increased demand for mobility widened the gap between supply and demand (Agbiboa 2022a). In Nigeria, the Lagos state government aims to phase out the use of the iconic danfos. Former governor Akinwunmi Ambode (2015–2019) lamented that, “When I wake up in the morning and see all these yellow buses ... and then we claim we are a megacity, that is not true and we must acknowledge that that is a faulty connectivity that we are running. Having accepted that, we have to look for the solution and that is why we want to banish yellow buses” (NCR 2017). Ambode’s comment reproduces popular perceptions of Africa’s informal transport sector as a chaotic embarrassment that needs to be “modernized.” The favored substitutes are the Lagos light rail project (also known as Lagos monorail)— contracted to the China Railway Construction Company—and Lagos BRT (bus rapid transit) system,2 generally deemed more befitting of a modernizing megacity with world-class ambitions. This language of modernity combines with an aesthetic mode of governing, or what Asher Ghertner (2011) calls “aesthetic governmentality,” to (re)produce pathological assessments of the African megalopolis, a pathology of which Lagos is its ne plus ultra. The fabric of the African city is perfunctorily read as a planning black hole, an insoluble problem. Johannesburg, for instance, is read as nothing but a “crime city.” In similar vein, the rich complexity of Lagos life is reduced to detritus, disease, and death, reproducing the colonial imaginary of “dirty natives” (Newell 2020) and an “impending apocalypse” (Sommers 2010: 319). This dystopian and Urban Taxi Slogans The People’s Arts
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: African Arts is devoted to the study and discussion of traditional, contemporary, and popular African arts and expressive cultures. Since 1967, African Arts readers have enjoyed high-quality visual depictions, cutting-edge explorations of theory and practice, and critical dialogue. Each issue features a core of peer-reviewed scholarly articles concerning the world"s second largest continent and its diasporas, and provides a host of resources - book and museum exhibition reviews, exhibition previews, features on collections, artist portfolios, dialogue and editorial columns. The journal promotes investigation of the connections between the arts and anthropology, history, language, literature, politics, religion, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
When the Retina Reflects the Brain: An Unusual Presentation of a Carotid-Cavernous Fistula. One Who Dreams Is Called A Prophet by Sultan Somjee Sane Wadu: I Hope So curated by Mukami Kuria and Angela Muritu Textiles in the History of the History of African Art African Textiles, Fashionable Textiles: An Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1