{"title":"社论:今日中国电声音乐","authors":"Marc Battier, Kenneth Fields, A. Liu","doi":"10.1017/S135577182200053X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The editors of the issue have, for many years, studied the vertiginous development of electroacoustic music in China. By residing in the country, organising conferences and symposia and creating personal connections, deep relations were established with the musical community. This led not only to the publications of articles, but also to the book Electroacoustic Music in East Asia (Battier and Fields 2020), which had the originality of gathering only contributions by local composers and scholars from East Asia. Much of this was realised as an outcome of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Asia Network (EMSAN), as does this present issue, on the theme of electroacoustic music in China today. Difficulties of translation were expected and encountered for our issue. Another hurdle was that the conception of a scholarly article in electroacoustic musicological research in China follows quite different habits. This led to a substantial amount of discussion between authors and editors. It was of course our premise that the issue would present a portrait of current views on electroacoustic music in China today, mostly from the prism of local composers and scholars who, in the end, have been responsible for the majority of articles. The others came from Western authors who have had a sustained relation with China. Otherwise, the local authors affirm here a Chineseness that is sometimes difficult to grasp for outsiders, no matter how familiar they may be with the culture. The issue opens with two articles by co-editors. Annie Yen-Ling Liu, a scholar who has previously published on Chinese electroacoustic music, investigates the ubiquitous postulation in much of the early literature of a unique compositional language that can be referred to as a ‘Chinese model’. She retraces the concept from the earliest works in the 1980s, up to today. In so doing, she provides a solid conceptual foundation, and the reader will find a superb list of bibliographical references. The second article by coeditor Marc Battier delves into the question of finding stylistic gradients in Chinese electroacoustic music, as he observes that, in China, many composers have crossed boundaries in a fashion rarely observed in other cultures. That consideration resonates deeply with several contributions from Chinese authors in the issue, although Battier discusses the categorisations provided by interculturalism studies. The following contribution written by Zhou Qian, a Shanghai composer and teacher, studies the work of several composers from the perspective of compositional techniques, including sound spatialisation. What is of importance is that the selected composers have studied abroad (Zhou herself having studied at CNMAT, UC Berkeley, and CCRMA, Stanford University). With a foreign advanced education, how these composers address the notion of Chineseness in their work is a theme that emerges in the article. Discussing the state of electroacoustic music in China involved the perspective of foreign composers who are attracted by working with traditional Chinese instrument performers. Anthony De Ritis, an American composer, has had a long experience with such an approach in his own work. He also alludes to the question of Chineseness in electroacoustic music through a number of pieces from Chinese and foreign composers. That very theme is then looked at from different perspectives. Li Qiuxiao is particularly intrigued by how three composers dealt with Chinese plucked strings instruments. Two of them used the guqin, a seven-string zithar often accompanying the recitation of poems, and one wrote for the pipa, a four-string instrument. In her article, Li studies how noise, inherent in plucked strings, is integrated in the electroacoustic materials. This led the author to considerations of how Western and Chinese composers handle noise in their work. The juxtaposition of a Chinese instrument and electroacoustic sounds was also addressed by Yang Ting and Zhou Ran, from Shenzhen University. In their contribution, however, they analyse a piece for pipa and tape with electroacoustic sounds, Mist on a Hill, written by a French composer for a Beijing performer. In so doing, the authors bring a fresh and original framework inspired by a Chinese approach to musical analysis, something that would be most unexpected in the Western tradition. Following is a number of articles from Chinese authors who discuss specific aspects of composing in China. Each is a vivid account of the questions and solutions encountered in working on the edge of","PeriodicalId":45145,"journal":{"name":"Organised Sound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Chinese Electroacoustic Music Today\",\"authors\":\"Marc Battier, Kenneth Fields, A. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S135577182200053X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The editors of the issue have, for many years, studied the vertiginous development of electroacoustic music in China. By residing in the country, organising conferences and symposia and creating personal connections, deep relations were established with the musical community. This led not only to the publications of articles, but also to the book Electroacoustic Music in East Asia (Battier and Fields 2020), which had the originality of gathering only contributions by local composers and scholars from East Asia. Much of this was realised as an outcome of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Asia Network (EMSAN), as does this present issue, on the theme of electroacoustic music in China today. Difficulties of translation were expected and encountered for our issue. Another hurdle was that the conception of a scholarly article in electroacoustic musicological research in China follows quite different habits. This led to a substantial amount of discussion between authors and editors. It was of course our premise that the issue would present a portrait of current views on electroacoustic music in China today, mostly from the prism of local composers and scholars who, in the end, have been responsible for the majority of articles. The others came from Western authors who have had a sustained relation with China. Otherwise, the local authors affirm here a Chineseness that is sometimes difficult to grasp for outsiders, no matter how familiar they may be with the culture. The issue opens with two articles by co-editors. Annie Yen-Ling Liu, a scholar who has previously published on Chinese electroacoustic music, investigates the ubiquitous postulation in much of the early literature of a unique compositional language that can be referred to as a ‘Chinese model’. She retraces the concept from the earliest works in the 1980s, up to today. In so doing, she provides a solid conceptual foundation, and the reader will find a superb list of bibliographical references. The second article by coeditor Marc Battier delves into the question of finding stylistic gradients in Chinese electroacoustic music, as he observes that, in China, many composers have crossed boundaries in a fashion rarely observed in other cultures. That consideration resonates deeply with several contributions from Chinese authors in the issue, although Battier discusses the categorisations provided by interculturalism studies. The following contribution written by Zhou Qian, a Shanghai composer and teacher, studies the work of several composers from the perspective of compositional techniques, including sound spatialisation. What is of importance is that the selected composers have studied abroad (Zhou herself having studied at CNMAT, UC Berkeley, and CCRMA, Stanford University). With a foreign advanced education, how these composers address the notion of Chineseness in their work is a theme that emerges in the article. Discussing the state of electroacoustic music in China involved the perspective of foreign composers who are attracted by working with traditional Chinese instrument performers. Anthony De Ritis, an American composer, has had a long experience with such an approach in his own work. He also alludes to the question of Chineseness in electroacoustic music through a number of pieces from Chinese and foreign composers. That very theme is then looked at from different perspectives. Li Qiuxiao is particularly intrigued by how three composers dealt with Chinese plucked strings instruments. Two of them used the guqin, a seven-string zithar often accompanying the recitation of poems, and one wrote for the pipa, a four-string instrument. In her article, Li studies how noise, inherent in plucked strings, is integrated in the electroacoustic materials. This led the author to considerations of how Western and Chinese composers handle noise in their work. The juxtaposition of a Chinese instrument and electroacoustic sounds was also addressed by Yang Ting and Zhou Ran, from Shenzhen University. In their contribution, however, they analyse a piece for pipa and tape with electroacoustic sounds, Mist on a Hill, written by a French composer for a Beijing performer. In so doing, the authors bring a fresh and original framework inspired by a Chinese approach to musical analysis, something that would be most unexpected in the Western tradition. Following is a number of articles from Chinese authors who discuss specific aspects of composing in China. Each is a vivid account of the questions and solutions encountered in working on the edge of\",\"PeriodicalId\":45145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organised Sound\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organised Sound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577182200053X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organised Sound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577182200053X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多年来,本刊编辑对中国电声音乐的飞速发展进行了研究。通过居住在该国,组织会议和专题讨论会以及建立个人联系,与音乐界建立了深厚的关系。这不仅导致了文章的出版,而且还出版了《东亚电声音乐》(Battier and Fields 2020)一书,该书具有独创性,只收集了东亚当地作曲家和学者的贡献。这大部分都是亚洲电声音乐研究网络(EMSAN)的成果,本期也是如此,主题是当今中国的电声音乐。对于我们的问题,翻译上的困难是预料到的,也是遇到的。另一个障碍是,中国的电声音乐学研究学术文章的概念遵循着截然不同的习惯。这导致了作者和编辑之间的大量讨论。当然,我们的前提是,这期杂志将呈现当今中国对电声音乐的看法,主要是从本地作曲家和学者的角度出发,他们最终负责了大多数文章。其他的则来自与中国有长期联系的西方作家。否则,本地作者在这里肯定了一种中国特色,这种特色有时对外地人来说很难理解,不管他们对中国文化有多熟悉。这期杂志以两篇共同编辑的文章开篇。刘艳玲(Annie Yen-Ling Liu)是一位学者,曾发表过关于中国电声音乐的文章,她研究了在许多早期文献中普遍存在的一种独特的作曲语言,这种语言可以被称为“中国模式”。她追溯了从20世纪80年代最早的作品到今天的概念。这样做,她提供了一个坚实的概念基础,读者会发现一个极好的参考书目列表。Marc Battier的第二篇文章深入探讨了在中国电声音乐中寻找风格渐变的问题,因为他观察到,在中国,许多作曲家以一种在其他文化中很少观察到的方式跨越了边界。尽管巴蒂尔讨论了跨文化主义研究提供的分类,但这一考虑与中国作家在这一问题上的几篇文章产生了深刻的共鸣。上海作曲家、教师周茜从作曲技巧(包括声音空间化)的角度研究了几位作曲家的作品。重要的是,入选的作曲家都有海外留学经历(周本人曾在加州大学伯克利分校CNMAT和斯坦福大学CCRMA学习)。在国外接受高等教育的背景下,这些作曲家如何在他们的作品中表达“中国性”的概念是本文的一个主题。讨论中国电声音乐的现状涉及到与中国传统乐器演奏家合作所吸引的外国作曲家的观点。美国作曲家安东尼·德·里斯(Anthony De Ritis)在自己的作品中长期使用这种方法。他还通过一些中外作曲家的作品暗示了电声音乐的中国性问题。然后从不同的角度来看待这个主题。李秋晓对三位作曲家如何处理中国拨弦乐器特别感兴趣。其中两人使用古琴,一种七弦的古琴,经常伴随诗歌朗诵,还有一人为琵琶,一种四弦乐器写作。在她的文章中,李研究了拨弦中固有的噪音是如何融入电声材料的。这使笔者开始思考西方和中国作曲家是如何在他们的作品中处理噪音的。来自深圳大学的杨婷和周然也谈到了中国乐器和电声的并立。然而,在他们的贡献中,他们分析了一段由法国作曲家为一位北京表演者创作的琵琶和电声磁带的作品《山上的雾》。在这样做的过程中,作者带来了一个新鲜而原始的框架,灵感来自中国的音乐分析方法,这在西方传统中是最意想不到的。以下是一些中国作家的文章,他们讨论了中国作曲的具体方面。每一个都生动地描述了在边缘工作中遇到的问题和解决方案
The editors of the issue have, for many years, studied the vertiginous development of electroacoustic music in China. By residing in the country, organising conferences and symposia and creating personal connections, deep relations were established with the musical community. This led not only to the publications of articles, but also to the book Electroacoustic Music in East Asia (Battier and Fields 2020), which had the originality of gathering only contributions by local composers and scholars from East Asia. Much of this was realised as an outcome of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Asia Network (EMSAN), as does this present issue, on the theme of electroacoustic music in China today. Difficulties of translation were expected and encountered for our issue. Another hurdle was that the conception of a scholarly article in electroacoustic musicological research in China follows quite different habits. This led to a substantial amount of discussion between authors and editors. It was of course our premise that the issue would present a portrait of current views on electroacoustic music in China today, mostly from the prism of local composers and scholars who, in the end, have been responsible for the majority of articles. The others came from Western authors who have had a sustained relation with China. Otherwise, the local authors affirm here a Chineseness that is sometimes difficult to grasp for outsiders, no matter how familiar they may be with the culture. The issue opens with two articles by co-editors. Annie Yen-Ling Liu, a scholar who has previously published on Chinese electroacoustic music, investigates the ubiquitous postulation in much of the early literature of a unique compositional language that can be referred to as a ‘Chinese model’. She retraces the concept from the earliest works in the 1980s, up to today. In so doing, she provides a solid conceptual foundation, and the reader will find a superb list of bibliographical references. The second article by coeditor Marc Battier delves into the question of finding stylistic gradients in Chinese electroacoustic music, as he observes that, in China, many composers have crossed boundaries in a fashion rarely observed in other cultures. That consideration resonates deeply with several contributions from Chinese authors in the issue, although Battier discusses the categorisations provided by interculturalism studies. The following contribution written by Zhou Qian, a Shanghai composer and teacher, studies the work of several composers from the perspective of compositional techniques, including sound spatialisation. What is of importance is that the selected composers have studied abroad (Zhou herself having studied at CNMAT, UC Berkeley, and CCRMA, Stanford University). With a foreign advanced education, how these composers address the notion of Chineseness in their work is a theme that emerges in the article. Discussing the state of electroacoustic music in China involved the perspective of foreign composers who are attracted by working with traditional Chinese instrument performers. Anthony De Ritis, an American composer, has had a long experience with such an approach in his own work. He also alludes to the question of Chineseness in electroacoustic music through a number of pieces from Chinese and foreign composers. That very theme is then looked at from different perspectives. Li Qiuxiao is particularly intrigued by how three composers dealt with Chinese plucked strings instruments. Two of them used the guqin, a seven-string zithar often accompanying the recitation of poems, and one wrote for the pipa, a four-string instrument. In her article, Li studies how noise, inherent in plucked strings, is integrated in the electroacoustic materials. This led the author to considerations of how Western and Chinese composers handle noise in their work. The juxtaposition of a Chinese instrument and electroacoustic sounds was also addressed by Yang Ting and Zhou Ran, from Shenzhen University. In their contribution, however, they analyse a piece for pipa and tape with electroacoustic sounds, Mist on a Hill, written by a French composer for a Beijing performer. In so doing, the authors bring a fresh and original framework inspired by a Chinese approach to musical analysis, something that would be most unexpected in the Western tradition. Following is a number of articles from Chinese authors who discuss specific aspects of composing in China. Each is a vivid account of the questions and solutions encountered in working on the edge of