L. Al-Mehaisen, Tariq N Al-Shatanawi, N. Al-Husban, Soha Albeitawi, D. Hiasat, Lena Al-Kuran, O. Al-kuran
{"title":"数字宫颈癌筛查:可靠的一站式方法?","authors":"L. Al-Mehaisen, Tariq N Al-Shatanawi, N. Al-Husban, Soha Albeitawi, D. Hiasat, Lena Al-Kuran, O. Al-kuran","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundWorldwide, cervical cancer (CC) is considered the fourth most common cancer in women. Globocandata stated 311,365 CC related mortalities in the world in 2018, 90% of them occurred in low-income countries. In Jordan, CC ranks as the 12th most common cancer among women. The primary aim of this report is to be able to decide if digital screening (DS) is reliable and worth using in our one stop gynecology clinics. Materials and MethodsThis study was done for all women who attended one stop out-patient gynecology services for routine CC screening between 1/1/2019 and 31/12/2019. Inclusion criteria requested women to be 18 years of age or more, healthy, and had previously normal cervical smear (conventional Pap smear (CPS) or Liquid based cytology (LBC)) i.e., all previous screening tests results were normal. ResultsA total number of 94 patients agreed to have the DS method done, mean age was 43 years. 25.5% were found to have abnormal screening results on DS. When compared to the national data of 12.5% abnormal smears in Liquid‐based cytology (LBC), there was a statistically significant difference in the numbers of abnormal screening results between both methods (p value of 0.000). LBC is used in most centers for CCS in Jordan ConclusionThe digital cervical screening method saves time and offers a one stop clinic management, therefore minimizing lost to follow up rate, and where colposcopy is indicated. Additionally, DS should be considered in low resource countries.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital cervical cancer screening: a reliable One-Stop method ?\",\"authors\":\"L. Al-Mehaisen, Tariq N Al-Shatanawi, N. Al-Husban, Soha Albeitawi, D. Hiasat, Lena Al-Kuran, O. Al-kuran\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundWorldwide, cervical cancer (CC) is considered the fourth most common cancer in women. Globocandata stated 311,365 CC related mortalities in the world in 2018, 90% of them occurred in low-income countries. In Jordan, CC ranks as the 12th most common cancer among women. The primary aim of this report is to be able to decide if digital screening (DS) is reliable and worth using in our one stop gynecology clinics. Materials and MethodsThis study was done for all women who attended one stop out-patient gynecology services for routine CC screening between 1/1/2019 and 31/12/2019. Inclusion criteria requested women to be 18 years of age or more, healthy, and had previously normal cervical smear (conventional Pap smear (CPS) or Liquid based cytology (LBC)) i.e., all previous screening tests results were normal. ResultsA total number of 94 patients agreed to have the DS method done, mean age was 43 years. 25.5% were found to have abnormal screening results on DS. When compared to the national data of 12.5% abnormal smears in Liquid‐based cytology (LBC), there was a statistically significant difference in the numbers of abnormal screening results between both methods (p value of 0.000). LBC is used in most centers for CCS in Jordan ConclusionThe digital cervical screening method saves time and offers a one stop clinic management, therefore minimizing lost to follow up rate, and where colposcopy is indicated. Additionally, DS should be considered in low resource countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i1.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital cervical cancer screening: a reliable One-Stop method ?
BackgroundWorldwide, cervical cancer (CC) is considered the fourth most common cancer in women. Globocandata stated 311,365 CC related mortalities in the world in 2018, 90% of them occurred in low-income countries. In Jordan, CC ranks as the 12th most common cancer among women. The primary aim of this report is to be able to decide if digital screening (DS) is reliable and worth using in our one stop gynecology clinics. Materials and MethodsThis study was done for all women who attended one stop out-patient gynecology services for routine CC screening between 1/1/2019 and 31/12/2019. Inclusion criteria requested women to be 18 years of age or more, healthy, and had previously normal cervical smear (conventional Pap smear (CPS) or Liquid based cytology (LBC)) i.e., all previous screening tests results were normal. ResultsA total number of 94 patients agreed to have the DS method done, mean age was 43 years. 25.5% were found to have abnormal screening results on DS. When compared to the national data of 12.5% abnormal smears in Liquid‐based cytology (LBC), there was a statistically significant difference in the numbers of abnormal screening results between both methods (p value of 0.000). LBC is used in most centers for CCS in Jordan ConclusionThe digital cervical screening method saves time and offers a one stop clinic management, therefore minimizing lost to follow up rate, and where colposcopy is indicated. Additionally, DS should be considered in low resource countries.