“在我想自杀的那一刻,然后我没有”:自杀未遂后住院青少年自杀计划、方法选择和方法替代的定性调查

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Youth & Society Pub Date : 2021-08-03 DOI:10.1177/0044118X211035950
Joanna Almeida, C. Barber, R. Rosen, A. Nicolopoulos, K. O’Brien
{"title":"“在我想自杀的那一刻,然后我没有”:自杀未遂后住院青少年自杀计划、方法选择和方法替代的定性调查","authors":"Joanna Almeida, C. Barber, R. Rosen, A. Nicolopoulos, K. O’Brien","doi":"10.1177/0044118X211035950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on planning, method choice, and method substitution in adolescents’ suicide attempts is limited. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 adolescents following their suicide attempt to learn the extent to which the attempt was planned, why they used the method they did, and whether they would have substituted another method if the one they used had been unavailable. Applied Thematic Analysis was used to identify codes and develop themes. Attempts were largely unplanned, and planned attempts were often haphazard, as urgency to escape immediate pain was a main impetus for the attempt. Method choice was driven by easy access. Half of participants said they would not have attempted suicide if the method they used were inaccessible, but 7 of 20 said they would have, and 3 were unsure. Not all suicide attempts would be prevented by blocking access to methods that adolescent attempters would otherwise use. To understand whether restricting access to low-lethality methods could harm some attempters, future research should examine in-the-moment method substitution.","PeriodicalId":47959,"journal":{"name":"Youth & Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"29 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“In the Moment I Wanted to Kill Myself, and Then After I Didn’t”: A Qualitative Investigation of Suicide Planning, Method Choice, and Method Substitution Among Adolescents Hospitalized Following a Suicide Attempt\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Almeida, C. Barber, R. Rosen, A. Nicolopoulos, K. O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0044118X211035950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on planning, method choice, and method substitution in adolescents’ suicide attempts is limited. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 adolescents following their suicide attempt to learn the extent to which the attempt was planned, why they used the method they did, and whether they would have substituted another method if the one they used had been unavailable. Applied Thematic Analysis was used to identify codes and develop themes. Attempts were largely unplanned, and planned attempts were often haphazard, as urgency to escape immediate pain was a main impetus for the attempt. Method choice was driven by easy access. Half of participants said they would not have attempted suicide if the method they used were inaccessible, but 7 of 20 said they would have, and 3 were unsure. Not all suicide attempts would be prevented by blocking access to methods that adolescent attempters would otherwise use. To understand whether restricting access to low-lethality methods could harm some attempters, future research should examine in-the-moment method substitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth & Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211035950\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211035950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于青少年自杀企图的计划、方法选择和方法替代的研究是有限的。我们对20名试图自杀的青少年进行了深度访谈,以了解他们自杀的计划程度,他们为什么使用这种方法,以及如果他们使用的方法不可用,他们是否会替代另一种方法。应用主题分析用于识别代码和制定主题。这些尝试在很大程度上是没有计划的,而有计划的尝试往往是偶然的,因为急于逃离眼前的痛苦是这些尝试的主要动力。方法选择受易获取性的驱动。一半的参与者表示,如果他们使用的方法无法使用,他们就不会试图自杀,但20人中有7人表示会自杀,3人不确定。并不是所有的自杀企图都可以通过阻止青少年自杀者使用其他方法来阻止。为了了解限制使用低死亡率的方法是否会伤害一些尝试者,未来的研究应该检查即时方法替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“In the Moment I Wanted to Kill Myself, and Then After I Didn’t”: A Qualitative Investigation of Suicide Planning, Method Choice, and Method Substitution Among Adolescents Hospitalized Following a Suicide Attempt
Research on planning, method choice, and method substitution in adolescents’ suicide attempts is limited. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 adolescents following their suicide attempt to learn the extent to which the attempt was planned, why they used the method they did, and whether they would have substituted another method if the one they used had been unavailable. Applied Thematic Analysis was used to identify codes and develop themes. Attempts were largely unplanned, and planned attempts were often haphazard, as urgency to escape immediate pain was a main impetus for the attempt. Method choice was driven by easy access. Half of participants said they would not have attempted suicide if the method they used were inaccessible, but 7 of 20 said they would have, and 3 were unsure. Not all suicide attempts would be prevented by blocking access to methods that adolescent attempters would otherwise use. To understand whether restricting access to low-lethality methods could harm some attempters, future research should examine in-the-moment method substitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Youth & Society
Youth & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For thirty-five years, Youth & Society has provided educators, counsellors, researchers, and policy makers with the latest research and scholarship in this dynamic field. This valuable resource examines critical contemporary issues and presents vital, practical information for studying and working with young people today. Each quarterly issue of Youth & Society features peer-reviewed articles by distinguished scholars and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and fields, including: sociology, public health, social work, education, criminology, psychology, anthropology, human services, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualization of Firearm-Related Terms Among Rural Adolescents: Definitions Matter. The Role of School Context Factors for Gender Role Attitudes: General and Differential Associations Between Female and Male Adolescents “We Know About Things Too”: Exploring the Labors of Love Involved in Cultivating Youth Voice in Online Youth Civic Engagement Programs With Youth of Color Recent Trend in the Prevalence and Correlates of Depression Among Chinese Young Adults from 2010 to 2018 Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Adolescent Cannabis Use in Washington State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1