{"title":"法律的疯狂创造——Luis Alberto Warat和Deleuze/Guattari关于法律符号学的想象对话","authors":"Leonardo Monteiro Crespo De Almeida","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to establish a dialogue between Luis Alberto Warat s project of a critical semiotics of law, one that avoids the common reductionisms of the legal epistemology from the beginning of the twentieth-century, and a few remarks of Deleuze/Guattari regarding semiotics. We take as our main reference the works of Deleuze and Guattari s scholars that read them within the framework of legal theory, our conclusion is that the authors, Warat and Deleuze/Guattari, develop philosophical centered on the creation and the uncanniness of Law instead of them being concerned with truth and the conditions of possibility of the scientific legal knowledge, two common features of earlier legal epistemological concerns.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"40 1","pages":"96-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A selvagem criação do direito – um diálogo imaginário entre Luis Alberto Warat e Deleuze/Guattari sobre a semiótica jurídica\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Monteiro Crespo De Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article intends to establish a dialogue between Luis Alberto Warat s project of a critical semiotics of law, one that avoids the common reductionisms of the legal epistemology from the beginning of the twentieth-century, and a few remarks of Deleuze/Guattari regarding semiotics. We take as our main reference the works of Deleuze and Guattari s scholars that read them within the framework of legal theory, our conclusion is that the authors, Warat and Deleuze/Guattari, develop philosophical centered on the creation and the uncanniness of Law instead of them being concerned with truth and the conditions of possibility of the scientific legal knowledge, two common features of earlier legal epistemological concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"96-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A selvagem criação do direito – um diálogo imaginário entre Luis Alberto Warat e Deleuze/Guattari sobre a semiótica jurídica
This article intends to establish a dialogue between Luis Alberto Warat s project of a critical semiotics of law, one that avoids the common reductionisms of the legal epistemology from the beginning of the twentieth-century, and a few remarks of Deleuze/Guattari regarding semiotics. We take as our main reference the works of Deleuze and Guattari s scholars that read them within the framework of legal theory, our conclusion is that the authors, Warat and Deleuze/Guattari, develop philosophical centered on the creation and the uncanniness of Law instead of them being concerned with truth and the conditions of possibility of the scientific legal knowledge, two common features of earlier legal epistemological concerns.