立陶宛的法定、有效和最佳净税收时间表

IF 0.9 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR IZA Journal of Labor Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/izajolp-2021-0005
Nerijus Černiauskas, Alain Jousten
{"title":"立陶宛的法定、有效和最佳净税收时间表","authors":"Nerijus Černiauskas, Alain Jousten","doi":"10.2478/izajolp-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We estimate effective and optimal net income tax schedules and compare them to the estimated statutory rates for the case of Lithuania for the period 2014–2015. Values of effective net tax rates are estimated from the survey of EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions; the statutory net tax rates are estimated with the European tax-benefit simulator EUROMOD, whereas optimal net taxes are calculated via Saez (2002) methodology. We find that the three net tax schedules are similar for employees in the middle of the income distribution. At the bottom of the income distribution, optimal net tax schedules suggest higher in-work benefits. The net tax schedules diverge substantially for the self-employed. At the top of the income distribution, where the majority of self-employed are concentrated, the self-employed are required to pay 15 cents less net taxes per Euro than employees—and they effectively pay 29 cents less.","PeriodicalId":45367,"journal":{"name":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statutory, effective, and optimal net tax schedules in Lithuania\",\"authors\":\"Nerijus Černiauskas, Alain Jousten\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/izajolp-2021-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We estimate effective and optimal net income tax schedules and compare them to the estimated statutory rates for the case of Lithuania for the period 2014–2015. Values of effective net tax rates are estimated from the survey of EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions; the statutory net tax rates are estimated with the European tax-benefit simulator EUROMOD, whereas optimal net taxes are calculated via Saez (2002) methodology. We find that the three net tax schedules are similar for employees in the middle of the income distribution. At the bottom of the income distribution, optimal net tax schedules suggest higher in-work benefits. The net tax schedules diverge substantially for the self-employed. At the top of the income distribution, where the majority of self-employed are concentrated, the self-employed are required to pay 15 cents less net taxes per Euro than employees—and they effectively pay 29 cents less.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IZA Journal of Labor Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IZA Journal of Labor Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2021-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要我们估计了有效和最佳的净所得税时间表,并将其与立陶宛2014-2015年期间的估计法定税率进行了比较。有效净税率的价值是根据欧盟收入和生活条件统计调查估算的;法定净税率是用欧洲税收优惠模拟器EUROMOD估计的,而最佳净税率是通过Saez(2002)方法计算的。我们发现,对于处于收入分配中间的员工,三种净税率表是相似的。在收入分配的底部,最佳的净税收计划表明工作福利更高。自营职业者的净税收表差异很大。在收入分配的顶端,大多数自营职业者都集中在那里,自营职业者每欧元需要比雇员少缴纳15美分的净税,而他们实际上少缴纳29美分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statutory, effective, and optimal net tax schedules in Lithuania
Abstract We estimate effective and optimal net income tax schedules and compare them to the estimated statutory rates for the case of Lithuania for the period 2014–2015. Values of effective net tax rates are estimated from the survey of EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions; the statutory net tax rates are estimated with the European tax-benefit simulator EUROMOD, whereas optimal net taxes are calculated via Saez (2002) methodology. We find that the three net tax schedules are similar for employees in the middle of the income distribution. At the bottom of the income distribution, optimal net tax schedules suggest higher in-work benefits. The net tax schedules diverge substantially for the self-employed. At the top of the income distribution, where the majority of self-employed are concentrated, the self-employed are required to pay 15 cents less net taxes per Euro than employees—and they effectively pay 29 cents less.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
IZA Journal of Labor Policy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes scientific articles that are relevant for policy-making. This refers to papers addressing the impact of institutional settings and policy interventions on labor market outcomes, both from a theoretical as well as from an empirical point of view. In addition, the IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes literature reviews and meta-analyses that synthesize existing research on policy relevant issues.
期刊最新文献
The distributional effects of the pension system reform in Poland Minimum wage and collective bargaining shocks: a narrative database for advanced economies Job Protection — It is Good to be an Insider The effects of more intensive counseling for disadvantaged unemployed youth Explaining the Evolution of Job Tenure in Europe, 1995–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1