市场经济中的剧场

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 THEATER CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10486801.2022.2063545
Hillary Miller
{"title":"市场经济中的剧场","authors":"Hillary Miller","doi":"10.1080/10486801.2022.2063545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"mentally changed the internal logic, characterization, and role category configuration of the plays. Genre management along the traditional/modern divide, with hybridization (in ganju’s [Jiangxi opera] case) and purification (in huju’s [Shanghai opera] and Cantonese opera’s cases) as the two main strategies, arbitrarily yet fundamentally changed the genres’ foundational repertoire, performance practices, and stage dramaturgy. The decentralization of the performer in theatre creation – the format of creative method – detached regional genres closely associated with popular entertainment (such as pingju [Ping opera]) from its folk roots and eventually diminished theatre of scenario forms (such as huocixi [‘live-line’ drama] troupes in Tianjin and tongsu huaju [popular spoken drama] in Shanghai). Last but not least, the transformation of star-centered troupes to stateowned companies – a formal change in xiqu’s ecosystem – directly led to its separation from market forces and a shift in their function from professional entertainment to bureaucratic organs prioritizing state, diplomatic, and military entertainment missions. A text-based approach has largely continued to dominate theatre studies and theatre history studies, giving priority to scripts, theories, and the researcher’s interpretation of scripts and theories. This is evidenced in the current Chinese theatre history and historiography. Transforming Tradition offers an excellent example of how a study of theatre history can include examinations of both textual products and the practitioner’s voice and body, and how such appraisals can effectively enhance each other. Through detailed performance analysis of song, speech, body language and their interactions with musical accompaniment – in a variety of audio and visual sources – Liu helps the reader gain insights into how a subtle change in vocal registration can help reveal a character’s internal world, how a master performer uses facial expressions and hand gestures to convey the hidden meaning of her lyrics, and how a comparison and contrasting of different versions of stage practices can illustrate the process of transformation during the xiqu reform. As we follow Liu’s meticulous descriptions and analyses of the practitioners’ voices and body languages, we learn not only what to watch and how to listen, but also the aesthetics and joy of appreciating xiqu. Transforming Tradition is a must-read for educators, researchers, students, and general readers who are interested in Chinese theatre history, Chinese cultural studies, theatre historiography, and the interplay between art and politics.","PeriodicalId":43835,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theatre in Market Economies\",\"authors\":\"Hillary Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10486801.2022.2063545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"mentally changed the internal logic, characterization, and role category configuration of the plays. Genre management along the traditional/modern divide, with hybridization (in ganju’s [Jiangxi opera] case) and purification (in huju’s [Shanghai opera] and Cantonese opera’s cases) as the two main strategies, arbitrarily yet fundamentally changed the genres’ foundational repertoire, performance practices, and stage dramaturgy. The decentralization of the performer in theatre creation – the format of creative method – detached regional genres closely associated with popular entertainment (such as pingju [Ping opera]) from its folk roots and eventually diminished theatre of scenario forms (such as huocixi [‘live-line’ drama] troupes in Tianjin and tongsu huaju [popular spoken drama] in Shanghai). Last but not least, the transformation of star-centered troupes to stateowned companies – a formal change in xiqu’s ecosystem – directly led to its separation from market forces and a shift in their function from professional entertainment to bureaucratic organs prioritizing state, diplomatic, and military entertainment missions. A text-based approach has largely continued to dominate theatre studies and theatre history studies, giving priority to scripts, theories, and the researcher’s interpretation of scripts and theories. This is evidenced in the current Chinese theatre history and historiography. Transforming Tradition offers an excellent example of how a study of theatre history can include examinations of both textual products and the practitioner’s voice and body, and how such appraisals can effectively enhance each other. Through detailed performance analysis of song, speech, body language and their interactions with musical accompaniment – in a variety of audio and visual sources – Liu helps the reader gain insights into how a subtle change in vocal registration can help reveal a character’s internal world, how a master performer uses facial expressions and hand gestures to convey the hidden meaning of her lyrics, and how a comparison and contrasting of different versions of stage practices can illustrate the process of transformation during the xiqu reform. As we follow Liu’s meticulous descriptions and analyses of the practitioners’ voices and body languages, we learn not only what to watch and how to listen, but also the aesthetics and joy of appreciating xiqu. Transforming Tradition is a must-read for educators, researchers, students, and general readers who are interested in Chinese theatre history, Chinese cultural studies, theatre historiography, and the interplay between art and politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2022.2063545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2022.2063545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从心理上改变了剧中的内在逻辑、人物塑造和角色类别配置。流派管理沿着传统/现代的划分,以杂交(赣剧)和净化(沪剧和粤剧)为两种主要策略,任意但根本地改变了流派的基本剧目、表演实践和舞台剧。表演者在戏剧创作中的分散化——创作方法的形式——将与大众娱乐密切相关的区域性流派(如评剧)从其民间根源中分离出来,并最终削弱了戏剧的情景形式(如天津的活戏剧团和上海的通素花剧)。最后但并非最不重要的是,以明星为中心的剧团向国有公司的转变——这是西曲生态系统的正式变化——直接导致了西曲与市场力量的分离,并将其职能从专业娱乐转变为优先执行国家、外交和军事娱乐任务的官僚机构。基于文本的方法在很大程度上继续主导着戏剧研究和戏剧史研究,优先考虑剧本、理论以及研究人员对剧本和理论的解释。这一点在当代中国戏剧史和史学史上都有证明。《转变传统》提供了一个很好的例子,说明戏剧史研究如何包括对文本产物和从业者的声音和身体的检查,以及这种评估如何有效地相互增强。通过对歌曲、语音、肢体语言及其与音乐伴奏的互动进行详细的表演分析——在各种音频和视觉来源中——刘帮助读者深入了解声音配准的细微变化如何有助于揭示角色的内心世界,一位演奏大师如何运用面部表情和手势来传达歌词中隐藏的含义,以及不同版本的舞台实践的比较和对比如何说明西曲改革期间的转变过程。随着刘对练习者声音和肢体语言的细致描述和分析,我们不仅学会了看什么、听什么,还学会了欣赏西曲的美学和乐趣。《改造传统》是对中国戏剧史、中国文化研究、戏剧史学以及艺术与政治之间的相互作用感兴趣的教育工作者、研究人员、学生和普通读者的必读之作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theatre in Market Economies
mentally changed the internal logic, characterization, and role category configuration of the plays. Genre management along the traditional/modern divide, with hybridization (in ganju’s [Jiangxi opera] case) and purification (in huju’s [Shanghai opera] and Cantonese opera’s cases) as the two main strategies, arbitrarily yet fundamentally changed the genres’ foundational repertoire, performance practices, and stage dramaturgy. The decentralization of the performer in theatre creation – the format of creative method – detached regional genres closely associated with popular entertainment (such as pingju [Ping opera]) from its folk roots and eventually diminished theatre of scenario forms (such as huocixi [‘live-line’ drama] troupes in Tianjin and tongsu huaju [popular spoken drama] in Shanghai). Last but not least, the transformation of star-centered troupes to stateowned companies – a formal change in xiqu’s ecosystem – directly led to its separation from market forces and a shift in their function from professional entertainment to bureaucratic organs prioritizing state, diplomatic, and military entertainment missions. A text-based approach has largely continued to dominate theatre studies and theatre history studies, giving priority to scripts, theories, and the researcher’s interpretation of scripts and theories. This is evidenced in the current Chinese theatre history and historiography. Transforming Tradition offers an excellent example of how a study of theatre history can include examinations of both textual products and the practitioner’s voice and body, and how such appraisals can effectively enhance each other. Through detailed performance analysis of song, speech, body language and their interactions with musical accompaniment – in a variety of audio and visual sources – Liu helps the reader gain insights into how a subtle change in vocal registration can help reveal a character’s internal world, how a master performer uses facial expressions and hand gestures to convey the hidden meaning of her lyrics, and how a comparison and contrasting of different versions of stage practices can illustrate the process of transformation during the xiqu reform. As we follow Liu’s meticulous descriptions and analyses of the practitioners’ voices and body languages, we learn not only what to watch and how to listen, but also the aesthetics and joy of appreciating xiqu. Transforming Tradition is a must-read for educators, researchers, students, and general readers who are interested in Chinese theatre history, Chinese cultural studies, theatre historiography, and the interplay between art and politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Contemporary Theatre Review (CTR) analyses what is most passionate and vital in theatre today. It encompasses a wide variety of theatres, from new playwrights and devisors to theatres of movement, image and other forms of physical expression, from new acting methods to music theatre and multi-media production work. Recognising the plurality of contemporary performance practices, it encourages contributions on physical theatre, opera, dance, design and the increasingly blurred boundaries between the physical and the visual arts.
期刊最新文献
Decolonizing Site-Specific Performance Methodologies: Preliminary Steps Liberal Lives and Activist Repertoires: Political Performance and Victorian Social Reform Let it Burn: Smell, Participation, and Solidarity in Travis Alabanza’s Burgerz Rethinking Didactic Theatre for a Young Audience Translating Simon Stone’s Radical Rewritings into German
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1