东地中海传统中的冥界之旅:从古代到拜占庭的地下世界之旅,作者:Gunnel Ekroth和Ingela Nilsson

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS CLASSICAL WORLD Pub Date : 2022-02-16 DOI:10.1353/clw.2022.0005
M. Skempis
{"title":"东地中海传统中的冥界之旅:从古代到拜占庭的地下世界之旅,作者:Gunnel Ekroth和Ingela Nilsson","authors":"M. Skempis","doi":"10.1353/clw.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"brief mention of the shape of the orchestra of the Theater of Dionysus in Athens in note 103 on page 20 [one might add, e.g., H. R. Goette, “An Archaeological Appendix,” in P. Wilson (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals: Documentary Studies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 116–121)]. The operations of the Delphic oracle (e.g., its “consultation day” or “regular operations”) are repeatedly referred to (124n5–7, 143n82–85, and 180n334), but not more fully explained until later in the line-by-line commentary (190n421). For those unfamiliar with these operations, an earlier explanation or cross-references to the later explanation might have been helpful. The use of the term “privileged” to describe any form of slavery—as on page 237: “[t]he former is an idealization (from the master’s point of view) that may correspond fairly well to reality in the case of nurses and tutors, privileged slaves who care for the master’s children,” referencing K. Synodinou, On the concept of slavery in Euripides (Ioannina: Ioannina University Press, 1977), and D. J. Mastronarde, Euripides Medea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 174n54)—is problematic as it can mislead naïve readers about the harsh realities of ancient slavery, particularly in the household. Gibert does, however, appear to acknowledge these harsh realities elsewhere (e.g., in mention of the “sexual availability of slaves” to their masters, 248n819–822). I noted only a few very minor typographical irregularities in the bibliography (sometimes a journal article citation was followed by a period and sometimes not: e.g., on pages 361–362) and Greek index (e.g., in the entries from εἰσπίπτειν to θυμέλη on page 374, the font used for the Greek is frequently used for page numbers as well). Despite these criticisms, this commentary fully deserves to join the ranks of Mastronarde’s 2002 Medea and L. Battezzato’s 2018 Hecuba (to name just two outstanding Euripidean examples in the Cambridge ‘Green and Yellow’ series) and be assigned to undergraduate and graduate students as well as treasured by more advanced scholars for years to come.","PeriodicalId":46369,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL WORLD","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Round Trip to Hades in the Eastern Mediterranean Tradition: Visits to the Underworld from Antiquity to Byzantium ed. by Gunnel Ekroth and Ingela Nilsson (review)\",\"authors\":\"M. Skempis\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/clw.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"brief mention of the shape of the orchestra of the Theater of Dionysus in Athens in note 103 on page 20 [one might add, e.g., H. R. Goette, “An Archaeological Appendix,” in P. Wilson (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals: Documentary Studies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 116–121)]. The operations of the Delphic oracle (e.g., its “consultation day” or “regular operations”) are repeatedly referred to (124n5–7, 143n82–85, and 180n334), but not more fully explained until later in the line-by-line commentary (190n421). For those unfamiliar with these operations, an earlier explanation or cross-references to the later explanation might have been helpful. The use of the term “privileged” to describe any form of slavery—as on page 237: “[t]he former is an idealization (from the master’s point of view) that may correspond fairly well to reality in the case of nurses and tutors, privileged slaves who care for the master’s children,” referencing K. Synodinou, On the concept of slavery in Euripides (Ioannina: Ioannina University Press, 1977), and D. J. Mastronarde, Euripides Medea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 174n54)—is problematic as it can mislead naïve readers about the harsh realities of ancient slavery, particularly in the household. Gibert does, however, appear to acknowledge these harsh realities elsewhere (e.g., in mention of the “sexual availability of slaves” to their masters, 248n819–822). I noted only a few very minor typographical irregularities in the bibliography (sometimes a journal article citation was followed by a period and sometimes not: e.g., on pages 361–362) and Greek index (e.g., in the entries from εἰσπίπτειν to θυμέλη on page 374, the font used for the Greek is frequently used for page numbers as well). Despite these criticisms, this commentary fully deserves to join the ranks of Mastronarde’s 2002 Medea and L. Battezzato’s 2018 Hecuba (to name just two outstanding Euripidean examples in the Cambridge ‘Green and Yellow’ series) and be assigned to undergraduate and graduate students as well as treasured by more advanced scholars for years to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL WORLD\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL WORLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL WORLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2022.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第20页的注释103中简要提及雅典狄奥尼索斯剧院管弦乐队的形状[可以添加,例如,H.R.Goette,“考古附录”,P.Wilson(编辑),《希腊戏剧和节日:文献研究》(纽约:剑桥大学出版社,2013116-121)]。德尔菲神谕的运作(例如,其“咨询日”或“常规运作”)被反复提及(124n5–7、143n82–85和180n334),但直到稍后的逐行评论(190n421)中才得到更充分的解释。对于那些不熟悉这些操作的人来说,早期的解释或对后期解释的交叉引用可能会有所帮助。使用“特权”一词来描述任何形式的奴隶制——如第237页所述:“前者是一种理想化(从主人的角度来看),在护士和家庭教师、照顾主人孩子的特权奴隶的情况下,可能与现实相当吻合。”,关于欧里庇得斯(约阿尼纳:约阿尼纳大学出版社,1977年)和D.J.Mastronarde,《欧里庇得美狄亚》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2002174n54年)中的奴隶制概念是有问题的,因为它会误导天真的读者了解古代奴隶制的严酷现实,尤其是在家庭中。然而,吉伯特似乎在其他地方承认了这些严酷的现实(例如,在提到“奴隶对主人的性可用性”时,248n819-822)。我只注意到参考书目中有一些非常小的印刷不规则之处(有时期刊文章引文后面跟着句号,有时没有:例如,第361-362页)和希腊语索引(例如,εἰ在第374页上,σπίπτεις变为θυμίλη,希腊语的字体也经常用于页码)。尽管有这些批评,但这篇评论完全值得加入Mastronarde 2002年的《美狄亚》和L.Battezzato 2018年的《赫库巴》(仅举剑桥“绿色和黄色”系列中的两个杰出的欧里庇得斯例子)的行列,并被分配给本科生和研究生,并在未来几年被更先进的学者所珍视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Round Trip to Hades in the Eastern Mediterranean Tradition: Visits to the Underworld from Antiquity to Byzantium ed. by Gunnel Ekroth and Ingela Nilsson (review)
brief mention of the shape of the orchestra of the Theater of Dionysus in Athens in note 103 on page 20 [one might add, e.g., H. R. Goette, “An Archaeological Appendix,” in P. Wilson (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals: Documentary Studies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 116–121)]. The operations of the Delphic oracle (e.g., its “consultation day” or “regular operations”) are repeatedly referred to (124n5–7, 143n82–85, and 180n334), but not more fully explained until later in the line-by-line commentary (190n421). For those unfamiliar with these operations, an earlier explanation or cross-references to the later explanation might have been helpful. The use of the term “privileged” to describe any form of slavery—as on page 237: “[t]he former is an idealization (from the master’s point of view) that may correspond fairly well to reality in the case of nurses and tutors, privileged slaves who care for the master’s children,” referencing K. Synodinou, On the concept of slavery in Euripides (Ioannina: Ioannina University Press, 1977), and D. J. Mastronarde, Euripides Medea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 174n54)—is problematic as it can mislead naïve readers about the harsh realities of ancient slavery, particularly in the household. Gibert does, however, appear to acknowledge these harsh realities elsewhere (e.g., in mention of the “sexual availability of slaves” to their masters, 248n819–822). I noted only a few very minor typographical irregularities in the bibliography (sometimes a journal article citation was followed by a period and sometimes not: e.g., on pages 361–362) and Greek index (e.g., in the entries from εἰσπίπτειν to θυμέλη on page 374, the font used for the Greek is frequently used for page numbers as well). Despite these criticisms, this commentary fully deserves to join the ranks of Mastronarde’s 2002 Medea and L. Battezzato’s 2018 Hecuba (to name just two outstanding Euripidean examples in the Cambridge ‘Green and Yellow’ series) and be assigned to undergraduate and graduate students as well as treasured by more advanced scholars for years to come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CLASSICAL WORLD
CLASSICAL WORLD CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Classical World (ISSN 0009-8418) is the quarterly journal of The Classical Association of the Atlantic States, published on a seasonal schedule with Fall (September-November), Winter (December-February), Spring (March-May), and Summer (June-August) issues. Begun in 1907 as The Classical Weekly, this peer-reviewed journal publishes contributions on all aspects of Greek and Roman literature, history, and society.
期刊最新文献
Fat and Large Bodies in Homeric Poetry: Iros and Penelope Cato the Elder and the "Theoretical Farmers" of 18th- and 19th-century Britain Gail Smith Supposititious Children and Athenian Civic Identity Digital Media and Online Resources in Ancient Mediterranean Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1