生命科学技能和能力的文化响应性评估:发展、现场测试、实施和结果

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Advanced Academics Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1177/1932202X20923981
R. Zimmerman, C. Maker, Fahad S. Alfaiz
{"title":"生命科学技能和能力的文化响应性评估:发展、现场测试、实施和结果","authors":"R. Zimmerman, C. Maker, Fahad S. Alfaiz","doi":"10.1177/1932202X20923981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A research team consisting of educators of gifted students, a scientist, and experts in measurement developed a performance-based assessment of life science skills and abilities. Four high schools in the Southwestern United States were the settings for field testing and implementation. Five levels of ratings were given: unknown, maybe, probably, definitely, and wow. The majority of student scores were in the maybe and probably categories. Using six new measures (concept maps in life and physical science, math problem solving, spatial analytical performance assessment, life science performance assessment and physical science performance assessment), 23 students (M2) were selected for participation in science laboratories at an R1 university along with 20 students (M1) selected by conventional means. When the nine attribute scores of the performance-based assessment were compared, no significant difference was found t(41), p > .38, between M1 and M2 students. Performance-based assessments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) will provide an alternative and a complement to standard achievement tests. They have the potential to identify and nurture exceptionally talented high school students across all demographic groups.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1932202X20923981","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally Responsive Assessment of Life Science Skills and Abilities: Development, Field Testing, Implementation, and Results\",\"authors\":\"R. Zimmerman, C. Maker, Fahad S. Alfaiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1932202X20923981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A research team consisting of educators of gifted students, a scientist, and experts in measurement developed a performance-based assessment of life science skills and abilities. Four high schools in the Southwestern United States were the settings for field testing and implementation. Five levels of ratings were given: unknown, maybe, probably, definitely, and wow. The majority of student scores were in the maybe and probably categories. Using six new measures (concept maps in life and physical science, math problem solving, spatial analytical performance assessment, life science performance assessment and physical science performance assessment), 23 students (M2) were selected for participation in science laboratories at an R1 university along with 20 students (M1) selected by conventional means. When the nine attribute scores of the performance-based assessment were compared, no significant difference was found t(41), p > .38, between M1 and M2 students. Performance-based assessments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) will provide an alternative and a complement to standard achievement tests. They have the potential to identify and nurture exceptionally talented high school students across all demographic groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1932202X20923981\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20923981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20923981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

一个由天才学生教育者、一名科学家和测量专家组成的研究小组对生命科学技能和能力进行了基于绩效的评估。美国西南部的四所高中是现场测试和实施的场所。给出了五个级别的评分:未知、可能、可能、肯定和哇。大多数学生的成绩都属于“可能”和“可能”两类。使用六种新的测量方法(生活和物理科学概念图、数学问题解决、空间分析绩效评估、生活科学绩效评估和物理科学绩效评估),选择23名学生(M2)和20名学生(M1)参加R1大学的科学实验室。当比较基于绩效的评估的九个属性得分时,没有发现显著差异t(41),p > .38,介于M1和M2学生之间。科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)中基于绩效的评估将为标准成绩测试提供替代和补充。他们有潜力在所有人口群体中识别和培养具有非凡天赋的高中生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Culturally Responsive Assessment of Life Science Skills and Abilities: Development, Field Testing, Implementation, and Results
A research team consisting of educators of gifted students, a scientist, and experts in measurement developed a performance-based assessment of life science skills and abilities. Four high schools in the Southwestern United States were the settings for field testing and implementation. Five levels of ratings were given: unknown, maybe, probably, definitely, and wow. The majority of student scores were in the maybe and probably categories. Using six new measures (concept maps in life and physical science, math problem solving, spatial analytical performance assessment, life science performance assessment and physical science performance assessment), 23 students (M2) were selected for participation in science laboratories at an R1 university along with 20 students (M1) selected by conventional means. When the nine attribute scores of the performance-based assessment were compared, no significant difference was found t(41), p > .38, between M1 and M2 students. Performance-based assessments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) will provide an alternative and a complement to standard achievement tests. They have the potential to identify and nurture exceptionally talented high school students across all demographic groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Word: Relationships Course Correction: Navigating Equity in Ninth-Grade Advanced Placement Navigating AP Research: Unveiling Applied Technology High School Students’ Perspectives, Gains, and Challenges Understanding English Language Arts Teachers’ Listening Orientations in Middle School Gifted Classrooms The Editorial Word: Interact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1