在欧洲冠名权赞助

IF 1 Q2 LINGUISTICS AILA Review Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1075/aila.21005.ger
Cornelia Gerhardt, B. Clarke, Justin Lecarpentier
{"title":"在欧洲冠名权赞助","authors":"Cornelia Gerhardt, B. Clarke, Justin Lecarpentier","doi":"10.1075/aila.21005.ger","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Football stadiums have traditionally been named after local sites (e.g. Goodison Park, Everton\n FC) or regions (Ruhrstadion, VfL Bochum). As big business takes increasing precedence in decision making in\n football at large (e.g. associations and leagues, regarding fixtures, media coverage, kick-off times, player transfers, etc.) and\n within individual football clubs (e.g. regarding kits and sponsorship), such toponyms are more and more being replaced by company\n or product names (e.g. bet365 Stadium, Stoke City). In this paper, we will consider corporate renamings from the\n German Bundesliga, the English Premier League and the French Ligue 1 and particularly fan reactions to controversial, badly\n received corporate renamings. As revealed by earlier studies, in our data here we also find the discourse and practices of the\n fans celebrating local identification with their city or region, often with the stadiums constituting the homestead of a\n tradition. Where corporate stadium renamings are badly received, this discourse clashes with the discourse of big business and\n thus a number of tensions are revealed. More specifically, in fans’ reactions to controversial corporate stadium renamings, we\n find a number of recurrent themes – for example, concerning consequences to fans’ identity to the club; in managing (anticipated)\n humorous retorts from rivals consequent from the stadium renaming; in resisting, but also feeling resigned to, financial pressures\n in selling the stadium name; etc. – some of them across our three national contexts and others specific to one national\n context.","PeriodicalId":45044,"journal":{"name":"AILA Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naming rights sponsorship in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Cornelia Gerhardt, B. Clarke, Justin Lecarpentier\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/aila.21005.ger\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Football stadiums have traditionally been named after local sites (e.g. Goodison Park, Everton\\n FC) or regions (Ruhrstadion, VfL Bochum). As big business takes increasing precedence in decision making in\\n football at large (e.g. associations and leagues, regarding fixtures, media coverage, kick-off times, player transfers, etc.) and\\n within individual football clubs (e.g. regarding kits and sponsorship), such toponyms are more and more being replaced by company\\n or product names (e.g. bet365 Stadium, Stoke City). In this paper, we will consider corporate renamings from the\\n German Bundesliga, the English Premier League and the French Ligue 1 and particularly fan reactions to controversial, badly\\n received corporate renamings. As revealed by earlier studies, in our data here we also find the discourse and practices of the\\n fans celebrating local identification with their city or region, often with the stadiums constituting the homestead of a\\n tradition. Where corporate stadium renamings are badly received, this discourse clashes with the discourse of big business and\\n thus a number of tensions are revealed. More specifically, in fans’ reactions to controversial corporate stadium renamings, we\\n find a number of recurrent themes – for example, concerning consequences to fans’ identity to the club; in managing (anticipated)\\n humorous retorts from rivals consequent from the stadium renaming; in resisting, but also feeling resigned to, financial pressures\\n in selling the stadium name; etc. – some of them across our three national contexts and others specific to one national\\n context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AILA Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AILA Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.21005.ger\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AILA Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.21005.ger","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

足球场传统上以当地场地(如古迪逊公园、埃弗顿足球俱乐部)或地区(鲁尔体育场、波鸿足球俱乐部)命名。随着大企业在整个足球决策中(例如,协会和联赛,关于赛程、媒体报道、开球时间、球员转会等)和各个足球俱乐部内部(例如,关于队服和赞助)的优先地位越来越高,这些地名越来越多地被公司或产品名称所取代(例如,斯托克城bet365体育场)。在本文中,我们将考虑德甲、英超和法甲的企业更名,特别是球迷对有争议、反响不佳的企业更名的反应。正如早期研究所揭示的那样,在我们的数据中,我们还发现了球迷们庆祝当地对其城市或地区认同的话语和做法,通常是因为体育场构成了传统的家园。在企业体育场更名反响不佳的地方,这种言论与大企业的言论相冲突,从而暴露出一些紧张关系。更具体地说,在球迷对有争议的公司体育场更名的反应中,我们发现了许多反复出现的主题——例如,关于球迷对俱乐部身份的影响;管理(预期的)因体育场更名而引起的竞争对手的幽默反驳;在抵制,但也感到听天由命,财政压力出售体育场名称;等等——其中一些涉及我们的三个国家背景,另一些则针对一个国家背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Naming rights sponsorship in Europe
Football stadiums have traditionally been named after local sites (e.g. Goodison Park, Everton FC) or regions (Ruhrstadion, VfL Bochum). As big business takes increasing precedence in decision making in football at large (e.g. associations and leagues, regarding fixtures, media coverage, kick-off times, player transfers, etc.) and within individual football clubs (e.g. regarding kits and sponsorship), such toponyms are more and more being replaced by company or product names (e.g. bet365 Stadium, Stoke City). In this paper, we will consider corporate renamings from the German Bundesliga, the English Premier League and the French Ligue 1 and particularly fan reactions to controversial, badly received corporate renamings. As revealed by earlier studies, in our data here we also find the discourse and practices of the fans celebrating local identification with their city or region, often with the stadiums constituting the homestead of a tradition. Where corporate stadium renamings are badly received, this discourse clashes with the discourse of big business and thus a number of tensions are revealed. More specifically, in fans’ reactions to controversial corporate stadium renamings, we find a number of recurrent themes – for example, concerning consequences to fans’ identity to the club; in managing (anticipated) humorous retorts from rivals consequent from the stadium renaming; in resisting, but also feeling resigned to, financial pressures in selling the stadium name; etc. – some of them across our three national contexts and others specific to one national context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AILA Review
AILA Review LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: AILA Review is a refereed publication of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée, an international federation of national associations for applied linguistics. All volumes are guest edited. As of volume 16, 2003, AILA Review is published with John Benjamins. This journal is peer reviewed and indexed in: Scopus
期刊最新文献
Analysing the explicit and implicit semantic structure of the Iljas Esenberlin novel trilogy “Nomads” ASR-based system for promoting pronunciation Chinese Russian language teachers’ agency in response to the New Liberal Arts policy Processing and appreciation of literary metaphors in English as a foreign language Unraveling the psychological impact of spatial cybertext environments on speech intent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1