五种美国硬木的耐磨性和硬度评定

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY Forest Products Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.13073/fpj-d-21-00074
L. Khademibami, R. Shmulsky, Dusty Snow, Alan Sherrington, Iris B. Montague, R. Ross, Xiping Wang
{"title":"五种美国硬木的耐磨性和硬度评定","authors":"L. Khademibami, R. Shmulsky, Dusty Snow, Alan Sherrington, Iris B. Montague, R. Ross, Xiping Wang","doi":"10.13073/fpj-d-21-00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The wear resistance and Janka hardness of five United States hardwood species were evaluated for potential use in bridge decking and truck flooring. The species tested include ash (Fraxinus sp.), hickory (Carya sp.), red oak (Quercus sp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and white oak (Quercus sp.). The specimens were prepared with the sizes of 1 by 2 by 4 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 10.16cm) for abrasion test and 1 by 2 by 6 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 15.24 cm) for Janka hardness testing. The specimens were cut from 30 individual parent boards of random width with clear sections for each species. The abrasion and Janka hardness tests were performed according to the American Society of Testing and Materials standards. All wear and hardness data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance. The results of this study demonstrated that sweetgum with the lowest density had the greatest amount of thicknesses loss and thus lowest wear resistance. White oak was found to have the least thicknesses loss, thus highest wear resistance among the hardwood species tested. Hickory, with the highest density, had the highest hardness among the hardwood species tested, but it had relatively lower wear resistance comparing to ash, red oak, and white oak.","PeriodicalId":12387,"journal":{"name":"Forest Products Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wear Resistance and Hardness Assessment of Five US Hardwoods for Bridge Decking and Truck Flooring\",\"authors\":\"L. Khademibami, R. Shmulsky, Dusty Snow, Alan Sherrington, Iris B. Montague, R. Ross, Xiping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.13073/fpj-d-21-00074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The wear resistance and Janka hardness of five United States hardwood species were evaluated for potential use in bridge decking and truck flooring. The species tested include ash (Fraxinus sp.), hickory (Carya sp.), red oak (Quercus sp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and white oak (Quercus sp.). The specimens were prepared with the sizes of 1 by 2 by 4 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 10.16cm) for abrasion test and 1 by 2 by 6 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 15.24 cm) for Janka hardness testing. The specimens were cut from 30 individual parent boards of random width with clear sections for each species. The abrasion and Janka hardness tests were performed according to the American Society of Testing and Materials standards. All wear and hardness data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance. The results of this study demonstrated that sweetgum with the lowest density had the greatest amount of thicknesses loss and thus lowest wear resistance. White oak was found to have the least thicknesses loss, thus highest wear resistance among the hardwood species tested. Hickory, with the highest density, had the highest hardness among the hardwood species tested, but it had relatively lower wear resistance comparing to ash, red oak, and white oak.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Products Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Products Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13073/fpj-d-21-00074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Products Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13073/fpj-d-21-00074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对美国五种硬木的耐磨性和Janka硬度进行了评估,以确定其在桥梁桥面和汽车地板中的潜在用途。测试的物种包括白蜡树(Fraxinus sp.)、山核桃(Carya sp.)、红橡树(Quercus sp.)、甜桉树(Liquidambar styraciflua)和白橡树(Quercus sp.)。试样尺寸分别为1 × 2 × 4英寸(2.54 × 5.08 × 10.16cm)进行磨损试验和1 × 2 × 6英寸(2.54 × 5.08 × 15.24 cm)进行Janka硬度试验。标本从30个随机宽度的单独母板上剪下,每个物种都有清晰的剖面。磨损和Janka硬度测试是根据美国测试和材料协会的标准进行的。所有磨损和硬度数据采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。本研究结果表明,密度最低的甜口香糖厚度损失最大,因此耐磨性最低。白橡木的厚度损失最小,因此在所有硬木中耐磨性最高。山核桃木密度最高,硬度最高,但耐磨性与灰栎、红栎和白栎相比相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wear Resistance and Hardness Assessment of Five US Hardwoods for Bridge Decking and Truck Flooring
The wear resistance and Janka hardness of five United States hardwood species were evaluated for potential use in bridge decking and truck flooring. The species tested include ash (Fraxinus sp.), hickory (Carya sp.), red oak (Quercus sp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and white oak (Quercus sp.). The specimens were prepared with the sizes of 1 by 2 by 4 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 10.16cm) for abrasion test and 1 by 2 by 6 inches (2.54 by 5.08 by 15.24 cm) for Janka hardness testing. The specimens were cut from 30 individual parent boards of random width with clear sections for each species. The abrasion and Janka hardness tests were performed according to the American Society of Testing and Materials standards. All wear and hardness data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance. The results of this study demonstrated that sweetgum with the lowest density had the greatest amount of thicknesses loss and thus lowest wear resistance. White oak was found to have the least thicknesses loss, thus highest wear resistance among the hardwood species tested. Hickory, with the highest density, had the highest hardness among the hardwood species tested, but it had relatively lower wear resistance comparing to ash, red oak, and white oak.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Products Journal
Forest Products Journal 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Products Journal (FPJ) is the source of information for industry leaders, researchers, teachers, students, and everyone interested in today''s forest products industry. The Forest Products Journal is well respected for publishing high-quality peer-reviewed technical research findings at the applied or practical level that reflect the current state of wood science and technology. Articles suitable as Technical Notes are brief notes (generally 1,200 words or less) that describe new or improved equipment or techniques; report on findings produced as by-products of major studies; or outline progress to date on long-term projects.
期刊最新文献
Design and Evaluation of a Shear Analogy Tool for Custom Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Panels Made from Various Wood Species Use and Future Development of Optical Measurement Technology in the Study of Wood Surface Roughness CiteSpace-Based Scientometric Analysis (2003 through 2022) Impact of Growth Characteristics on Properties of 2 by 8 Southern Yellow Pine Structural Lumber Interactive Evolutionary Design of Handbag Integrating Bamboo Weaving Material The Effect of Global Value Chain Participation on Carbon Embodied in Forest Product Exports: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the Financial Crisis Shock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1