阅读丹尼尔·库克的《斯威夫特的诗歌》和约瑟夫·霍恩的《正在成长的亚历山大·波普》(书评)

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662
Claude Willan
{"title":"阅读丹尼尔·库克的《斯威夫特的诗歌》和约瑟夫·霍恩的《正在成长的亚历山大·波普》(书评)","authors":"Claude Willan","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The single-author study enjoys a difficult relationship with literary studies. Since Warton, or Addison, or Dennis, it has been, if not the coin of the realm, at least a gold standard against which that currency is guaranteed. By the same token, the single-author study is redolent of those attitudes toward history and canonicity (both of them ostensibly conservative models) that literary studies have worked so assiduously—and rightly—to displace. The scholar who undertakes a single-author study of a figure from the old canon is on the horns of this dilemma: to justify the study’s focus without invoking politically otiose heuristics.","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Swift's Poetry by Daniel Cook, and: Alexander Pope in the Making by Joseph Hone (review)\",\"authors\":\"Claude Willan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The single-author study enjoys a difficult relationship with literary studies. Since Warton, or Addison, or Dennis, it has been, if not the coin of the realm, at least a gold standard against which that currency is guaranteed. By the same token, the single-author study is redolent of those attitudes toward history and canonicity (both of them ostensibly conservative models) that literary studies have worked so assiduously—and rightly—to displace. The scholar who undertakes a single-author study of a figure from the old canon is on the horns of this dilemma: to justify the study’s focus without invoking politically otiose heuristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单作者研究与文学研究的关系并不融洽。自沃顿、艾迪生或丹尼斯以来,它即使不是这个领域的货币,至少也是一种保证货币的黄金标准。出于同样的原因,单作者研究散发出对历史和经典的态度(两者表面上都是保守的模式),而文学研究一直在努力——而且是正确地——取代这些态度。一个学者如果对一个来自旧经典的人物进行单作者研究,就会陷入这样的两难境地:既要证明研究的重点是正确的,又不能援引政治上无关紧要的启发式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading Swift's Poetry by Daniel Cook, and: Alexander Pope in the Making by Joseph Hone (review)
The single-author study enjoys a difficult relationship with literary studies. Since Warton, or Addison, or Dennis, it has been, if not the coin of the realm, at least a gold standard against which that currency is guaranteed. By the same token, the single-author study is redolent of those attitudes toward history and canonicity (both of them ostensibly conservative models) that literary studies have worked so assiduously—and rightly—to displace. The scholar who undertakes a single-author study of a figure from the old canon is on the horns of this dilemma: to justify the study’s focus without invoking politically otiose heuristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
期刊最新文献
Polemics, Literature, and Knowledge in Eighteenth-Century Mexico: A New World for the Republic of Letters by José Francisco Robles (review) The New Cambridge Companion to Samuel Johnson ed. by Greg Clingham (review) Prince Eugene of Savoy: A Genius for War Against Louis XIV and the Ottoman Empire by James Falkner, and: Charles XII's Karoliners, Vol.1: Swedish Infantry and Artillery of the Great Northern War 1700–1721 by Sergey Shamenkov (review) The Temple of Fame and Friendship: Portraits, Music, and History in the C. P. E. Bach Circle by Annette Richards (review) Pathologies of Motion: Historical Thinking in Medicine, Aesthetics, and Poetics by Kevis Goodman (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1